Gendered Race: Are Infants’ Face Preferences Guided by Intersectionality of Sex and Race?

People occupy multiple social categories simultaneously (e.g., a White female), and this complex intersectionality affects fundamental aspects of social perception. Here, we examined the possibility that infant face processing may be susceptible to effects of intersectionality of sex and race. Three...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hojin I Kim, Kerri L Johnson, Scott P Johnson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01330/full
id doaj-121538fad32a4218aef371ee13d6c290
record_format Article
spelling doaj-121538fad32a4218aef371ee13d6c2902020-11-24T23:52:30ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782015-09-01610.3389/fpsyg.2015.01330132061Gendered Race: Are Infants’ Face Preferences Guided by Intersectionality of Sex and Race?Hojin I Kim0Kerri L Johnson1Scott P Johnson2University of California, Los AngelesUniversity of California, Los AngelesUniversity of California, Los AngelesPeople occupy multiple social categories simultaneously (e.g., a White female), and this complex intersectionality affects fundamental aspects of social perception. Here, we examined the possibility that infant face processing may be susceptible to effects of intersectionality of sex and race. Three- and 10-month-old infants were shown a series of computer-generated face pairs (5 s each) that differed according to sex (F or M) or race (Asian, Black, or White). All possible combinations of face pairs were tested, and preferences were recorded with an eye tracker. Infants showed preferences for more feminine faces only when they were White, but we found no evidence that White or Asian faces were preferred even though they are relatively more feminized. These findings challenge the notions that infants’ social categories are processed independently of one another and that infants’ preferences for sex or race can be explained from mere exposure.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01330/fullsex differencessocial developmentsocial cognitive developmentsex and race categorizationinfant face preference
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hojin I Kim
Kerri L Johnson
Scott P Johnson
spellingShingle Hojin I Kim
Kerri L Johnson
Scott P Johnson
Gendered Race: Are Infants’ Face Preferences Guided by Intersectionality of Sex and Race?
Frontiers in Psychology
sex differences
social development
social cognitive development
sex and race categorization
infant face preference
author_facet Hojin I Kim
Kerri L Johnson
Scott P Johnson
author_sort Hojin I Kim
title Gendered Race: Are Infants’ Face Preferences Guided by Intersectionality of Sex and Race?
title_short Gendered Race: Are Infants’ Face Preferences Guided by Intersectionality of Sex and Race?
title_full Gendered Race: Are Infants’ Face Preferences Guided by Intersectionality of Sex and Race?
title_fullStr Gendered Race: Are Infants’ Face Preferences Guided by Intersectionality of Sex and Race?
title_full_unstemmed Gendered Race: Are Infants’ Face Preferences Guided by Intersectionality of Sex and Race?
title_sort gendered race: are infants’ face preferences guided by intersectionality of sex and race?
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2015-09-01
description People occupy multiple social categories simultaneously (e.g., a White female), and this complex intersectionality affects fundamental aspects of social perception. Here, we examined the possibility that infant face processing may be susceptible to effects of intersectionality of sex and race. Three- and 10-month-old infants were shown a series of computer-generated face pairs (5 s each) that differed according to sex (F or M) or race (Asian, Black, or White). All possible combinations of face pairs were tested, and preferences were recorded with an eye tracker. Infants showed preferences for more feminine faces only when they were White, but we found no evidence that White or Asian faces were preferred even though they are relatively more feminized. These findings challenge the notions that infants’ social categories are processed independently of one another and that infants’ preferences for sex or race can be explained from mere exposure.
topic sex differences
social development
social cognitive development
sex and race categorization
infant face preference
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01330/full
work_keys_str_mv AT hojinikim genderedraceareinfantsfacepreferencesguidedbyintersectionalityofsexandrace
AT kerriljohnson genderedraceareinfantsfacepreferencesguidedbyintersectionalityofsexandrace
AT scottpjohnson genderedraceareinfantsfacepreferencesguidedbyintersectionalityofsexandrace
_version_ 1725473442459811840