Multilevel instrumented posterolateral lumbar spine fusion with an allogeneic cellular bone graft

Abstract Background Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of absence from work, disability, and impaired quality of life. Fusion surgery may be indicated when non-operative treatments have failed to provide relief. Surgery may include the use of fusion-enhancing implants, such as cellular bone al...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: John F. Hall, Julie B. McLean, Savannah M. Jones, Mark A. Moore, Michelle D. Nicholson, Kimberly A. Dorsch
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-11-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13018-019-1424-2
id doaj-1244a2ca2ecd445da4689e622d568a27
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1244a2ca2ecd445da4689e622d568a272020-11-25T04:08:30ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2019-11-011411910.1186/s13018-019-1424-2Multilevel instrumented posterolateral lumbar spine fusion with an allogeneic cellular bone graftJohn F. Hall0Julie B. McLean1Savannah M. Jones2Mark A. Moore3Michelle D. Nicholson4Kimberly A. Dorsch5Flagstaff Bone and JointLifeNet HealthFlagstaff Bone and JointLifeNet HealthLifeNet HealthLifeNet HealthAbstract Background Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of absence from work, disability, and impaired quality of life. Fusion surgery may be indicated when non-operative treatments have failed to provide relief. Surgery may include the use of fusion-enhancing implants, such as cellular bone allografts (CBAs). The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of one CBA (V-CBA) in patients who underwent instrumented posterolateral fusion (IPLF). Methods Retrospective data were collected from 150 consecutive patients who had undergone IPLF surgery between January 1, 2015, and March 31, 2018, in which V-CBA was used. All surgeries were performed by one surgeon. V-CBA was mixed with local autograft bone. Patient diagnoses included degenerative disc disease, spondylosis, spondylolisthesis, or spondylolysis with or without stenosis. Standing anteroposterior (AP) and lateral images were collected prior to surgery and again at the terminal visit, which took place between 6 and 33 months post-operatively. De-identified images were assessed radiologically. Adverse events were documented. The primary composite endpoint of fusion status was dependent upon two main criteria: bridging bone per the Lenke scale (classified as “A” definitely solid or “B” possibly solid) and posterior hardware status (intact). Lenke scale C or D were categorized as pseudarthrosis. Results Eighty-seven male and 63 female patients (613 levels total) underwent IPLF in which V-CBA was implanted. An average of 4.1 levels was treated, with 59.3% of patients having undergone treatment for more than 3 levels. Twenty-nine percent of patients had diabetes. Fifty-two percent of patients had previously used nicotine products, and 12% were current smokers. Sixteen serious adverse events were recorded and included lumbar seroma, cerebrospinal fluid leak, wound dehiscence, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, and myocardial infarction. Successful fusion (Lenke scale “A” or “B”) was recorded in 148 out of 150 patients (98.7%), or 608 out of 613 levels. The total pseudarthrosis rate was 0.8%. Conclusions The use of V-CBA combined with local autograft in multilevel IPLF resulted in successful fusions in 98.7% of patients. These results are particularly robust given the complex nature of many of these cases: 89 patients had 4 or more surgical levels, and many patients had multiple comorbidities. Level of evidence IVhttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13018-019-1424-2Posterolateral fusionLow back painMultilevelCellular bone allograftBone regenerationAllograft
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author John F. Hall
Julie B. McLean
Savannah M. Jones
Mark A. Moore
Michelle D. Nicholson
Kimberly A. Dorsch
spellingShingle John F. Hall
Julie B. McLean
Savannah M. Jones
Mark A. Moore
Michelle D. Nicholson
Kimberly A. Dorsch
Multilevel instrumented posterolateral lumbar spine fusion with an allogeneic cellular bone graft
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Posterolateral fusion
Low back pain
Multilevel
Cellular bone allograft
Bone regeneration
Allograft
author_facet John F. Hall
Julie B. McLean
Savannah M. Jones
Mark A. Moore
Michelle D. Nicholson
Kimberly A. Dorsch
author_sort John F. Hall
title Multilevel instrumented posterolateral lumbar spine fusion with an allogeneic cellular bone graft
title_short Multilevel instrumented posterolateral lumbar spine fusion with an allogeneic cellular bone graft
title_full Multilevel instrumented posterolateral lumbar spine fusion with an allogeneic cellular bone graft
title_fullStr Multilevel instrumented posterolateral lumbar spine fusion with an allogeneic cellular bone graft
title_full_unstemmed Multilevel instrumented posterolateral lumbar spine fusion with an allogeneic cellular bone graft
title_sort multilevel instrumented posterolateral lumbar spine fusion with an allogeneic cellular bone graft
publisher BMC
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
issn 1749-799X
publishDate 2019-11-01
description Abstract Background Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of absence from work, disability, and impaired quality of life. Fusion surgery may be indicated when non-operative treatments have failed to provide relief. Surgery may include the use of fusion-enhancing implants, such as cellular bone allografts (CBAs). The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of one CBA (V-CBA) in patients who underwent instrumented posterolateral fusion (IPLF). Methods Retrospective data were collected from 150 consecutive patients who had undergone IPLF surgery between January 1, 2015, and March 31, 2018, in which V-CBA was used. All surgeries were performed by one surgeon. V-CBA was mixed with local autograft bone. Patient diagnoses included degenerative disc disease, spondylosis, spondylolisthesis, or spondylolysis with or without stenosis. Standing anteroposterior (AP) and lateral images were collected prior to surgery and again at the terminal visit, which took place between 6 and 33 months post-operatively. De-identified images were assessed radiologically. Adverse events were documented. The primary composite endpoint of fusion status was dependent upon two main criteria: bridging bone per the Lenke scale (classified as “A” definitely solid or “B” possibly solid) and posterior hardware status (intact). Lenke scale C or D were categorized as pseudarthrosis. Results Eighty-seven male and 63 female patients (613 levels total) underwent IPLF in which V-CBA was implanted. An average of 4.1 levels was treated, with 59.3% of patients having undergone treatment for more than 3 levels. Twenty-nine percent of patients had diabetes. Fifty-two percent of patients had previously used nicotine products, and 12% were current smokers. Sixteen serious adverse events were recorded and included lumbar seroma, cerebrospinal fluid leak, wound dehiscence, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, and myocardial infarction. Successful fusion (Lenke scale “A” or “B”) was recorded in 148 out of 150 patients (98.7%), or 608 out of 613 levels. The total pseudarthrosis rate was 0.8%. Conclusions The use of V-CBA combined with local autograft in multilevel IPLF resulted in successful fusions in 98.7% of patients. These results are particularly robust given the complex nature of many of these cases: 89 patients had 4 or more surgical levels, and many patients had multiple comorbidities. Level of evidence IV
topic Posterolateral fusion
Low back pain
Multilevel
Cellular bone allograft
Bone regeneration
Allograft
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13018-019-1424-2
work_keys_str_mv AT johnfhall multilevelinstrumentedposterolaterallumbarspinefusionwithanallogeneiccellularbonegraft
AT juliebmclean multilevelinstrumentedposterolaterallumbarspinefusionwithanallogeneiccellularbonegraft
AT savannahmjones multilevelinstrumentedposterolaterallumbarspinefusionwithanallogeneiccellularbonegraft
AT markamoore multilevelinstrumentedposterolaterallumbarspinefusionwithanallogeneiccellularbonegraft
AT michellednicholson multilevelinstrumentedposterolaterallumbarspinefusionwithanallogeneiccellularbonegraft
AT kimberlyadorsch multilevelinstrumentedposterolaterallumbarspinefusionwithanallogeneiccellularbonegraft
_version_ 1724425404930850816