Dosimetric Coverage of the External Anal Sphincter by 3-Dimensional Conformal Fields in Rectal Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation: Implications for the Concept of Sphincter-Preserving Radiation Therapy
Background. We evaluated the anatomic location of the external anal sphincter (EAS) to pelvic bony landmarks related to 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DRT) and studied the dosimetric coverage of the EAS in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Methods. Sixty-four...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2014-01-01
|
Series: | BioMed Research International |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/578243 |
id |
doaj-12495ed7a354452a9d7fe2f689b09838 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-12495ed7a354452a9d7fe2f689b098382020-11-25T02:03:43ZengHindawi LimitedBioMed Research International2314-61332314-61412014-01-01201410.1155/2014/578243578243Dosimetric Coverage of the External Anal Sphincter by 3-Dimensional Conformal Fields in Rectal Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation: Implications for the Concept of Sphincter-Preserving Radiation TherapyYi-Jen Chen0Michelle B. Chen1Alan J. Liu2Julian Sanchez3Peter Tsai4An Liu5Radiation Oncology, City of Hope Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, USARadiation Oncology, City of Hope Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, USARadiation Oncology, City of Hope Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, USAColorectal Surgery, City of Hope Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, USARadiation Oncology, City of Hope Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, USARadiation Oncology, City of Hope Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, USABackground. We evaluated the anatomic location of the external anal sphincter (EAS) to pelvic bony landmarks related to 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DRT) and studied the dosimetric coverage of the EAS in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Methods. Sixty-four consecutive rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation were included. All patients were treated in a prone position on a bellyboard by 3DRT. The inferior border of the RT fields was at least 3–5 cm inferior to the gross tumorous volume (GTV) or at the inferior border of the obturator foramen (IBOF), whichever was more inferior. The EAS was contoured and dose distributions were determined using dose-volume histograms. Results. In 53 out of 64 cases (82.8%), the EAS was completely inferior to the IBOF. In the remaining 11 cases, the EAS was either overlapping the IBOF (10 cases; 15.6%) or completely superior to the IBOF (1 case; 1.7%). The average mean dose delivered to the EAS was 2795 cGy. Lower mean doses were delivered to the EAS when the center of the EAS was located more distant from the GTV. Conclusions. Meticulous planning to define the inferior border of the RT field is recommended to avoid irradiating the EAS.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/578243 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yi-Jen Chen Michelle B. Chen Alan J. Liu Julian Sanchez Peter Tsai An Liu |
spellingShingle |
Yi-Jen Chen Michelle B. Chen Alan J. Liu Julian Sanchez Peter Tsai An Liu Dosimetric Coverage of the External Anal Sphincter by 3-Dimensional Conformal Fields in Rectal Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation: Implications for the Concept of Sphincter-Preserving Radiation Therapy BioMed Research International |
author_facet |
Yi-Jen Chen Michelle B. Chen Alan J. Liu Julian Sanchez Peter Tsai An Liu |
author_sort |
Yi-Jen Chen |
title |
Dosimetric Coverage of the External Anal Sphincter by 3-Dimensional Conformal Fields in Rectal Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation: Implications for the Concept of Sphincter-Preserving Radiation Therapy |
title_short |
Dosimetric Coverage of the External Anal Sphincter by 3-Dimensional Conformal Fields in Rectal Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation: Implications for the Concept of Sphincter-Preserving Radiation Therapy |
title_full |
Dosimetric Coverage of the External Anal Sphincter by 3-Dimensional Conformal Fields in Rectal Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation: Implications for the Concept of Sphincter-Preserving Radiation Therapy |
title_fullStr |
Dosimetric Coverage of the External Anal Sphincter by 3-Dimensional Conformal Fields in Rectal Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation: Implications for the Concept of Sphincter-Preserving Radiation Therapy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dosimetric Coverage of the External Anal Sphincter by 3-Dimensional Conformal Fields in Rectal Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation: Implications for the Concept of Sphincter-Preserving Radiation Therapy |
title_sort |
dosimetric coverage of the external anal sphincter by 3-dimensional conformal fields in rectal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation: implications for the concept of sphincter-preserving radiation therapy |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
BioMed Research International |
issn |
2314-6133 2314-6141 |
publishDate |
2014-01-01 |
description |
Background. We evaluated the anatomic location of the external anal sphincter (EAS) to pelvic bony landmarks related to 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DRT) and studied the dosimetric coverage of the EAS in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Methods. Sixty-four consecutive rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation were included. All patients were treated in a prone position on a bellyboard by 3DRT. The inferior border of the RT fields was at least 3–5 cm inferior to the gross tumorous volume (GTV) or at the inferior border of the obturator foramen (IBOF), whichever was more inferior. The EAS was contoured and dose distributions were determined using dose-volume histograms. Results. In 53 out of 64 cases (82.8%), the EAS was completely inferior to the IBOF. In the remaining 11 cases, the EAS was either overlapping the IBOF (10 cases; 15.6%) or completely superior to the IBOF (1 case; 1.7%). The average mean dose delivered to the EAS was 2795 cGy. Lower mean doses were delivered to the EAS when the center of the EAS was located more distant from the GTV. Conclusions. Meticulous planning to define the inferior border of the RT field is recommended to avoid irradiating the EAS. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/578243 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yijenchen dosimetriccoverageoftheexternalanalsphincterby3dimensionalconformalfieldsinrectalcancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemoradiationimplicationsfortheconceptofsphincterpreservingradiationtherapy AT michellebchen dosimetriccoverageoftheexternalanalsphincterby3dimensionalconformalfieldsinrectalcancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemoradiationimplicationsfortheconceptofsphincterpreservingradiationtherapy AT alanjliu dosimetriccoverageoftheexternalanalsphincterby3dimensionalconformalfieldsinrectalcancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemoradiationimplicationsfortheconceptofsphincterpreservingradiationtherapy AT juliansanchez dosimetriccoverageoftheexternalanalsphincterby3dimensionalconformalfieldsinrectalcancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemoradiationimplicationsfortheconceptofsphincterpreservingradiationtherapy AT petertsai dosimetriccoverageoftheexternalanalsphincterby3dimensionalconformalfieldsinrectalcancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemoradiationimplicationsfortheconceptofsphincterpreservingradiationtherapy AT anliu dosimetriccoverageoftheexternalanalsphincterby3dimensionalconformalfieldsinrectalcancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemoradiationimplicationsfortheconceptofsphincterpreservingradiationtherapy |
_version_ |
1724946168591417344 |