Dosimetric Coverage of the External Anal Sphincter by 3-Dimensional Conformal Fields in Rectal Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation: Implications for the Concept of Sphincter-Preserving Radiation Therapy

Background. We evaluated the anatomic location of the external anal sphincter (EAS) to pelvic bony landmarks related to 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DRT) and studied the dosimetric coverage of the EAS in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Methods. Sixty-four...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yi-Jen Chen, Michelle B. Chen, Alan J. Liu, Julian Sanchez, Peter Tsai, An Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2014-01-01
Series:BioMed Research International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/578243
id doaj-12495ed7a354452a9d7fe2f689b09838
record_format Article
spelling doaj-12495ed7a354452a9d7fe2f689b098382020-11-25T02:03:43ZengHindawi LimitedBioMed Research International2314-61332314-61412014-01-01201410.1155/2014/578243578243Dosimetric Coverage of the External Anal Sphincter by 3-Dimensional Conformal Fields in Rectal Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation: Implications for the Concept of Sphincter-Preserving Radiation TherapyYi-Jen Chen0Michelle B. Chen1Alan J. Liu2Julian Sanchez3Peter Tsai4An Liu5Radiation Oncology, City of Hope Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, USARadiation Oncology, City of Hope Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, USARadiation Oncology, City of Hope Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, USAColorectal Surgery, City of Hope Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, USARadiation Oncology, City of Hope Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, USARadiation Oncology, City of Hope Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, USABackground. We evaluated the anatomic location of the external anal sphincter (EAS) to pelvic bony landmarks related to 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DRT) and studied the dosimetric coverage of the EAS in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Methods. Sixty-four consecutive rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation were included. All patients were treated in a prone position on a bellyboard by 3DRT. The inferior border of the RT fields was at least 3–5 cm inferior to the gross tumorous volume (GTV) or at the inferior border of the obturator foramen (IBOF), whichever was more inferior. The EAS was contoured and dose distributions were determined using dose-volume histograms. Results. In 53 out of 64 cases (82.8%), the EAS was completely inferior to the IBOF. In the remaining 11 cases, the EAS was either overlapping the IBOF (10 cases; 15.6%) or completely superior to the IBOF (1 case; 1.7%). The average mean dose delivered to the EAS was 2795 cGy. Lower mean doses were delivered to the EAS when the center of the EAS was located more distant from the GTV. Conclusions. Meticulous planning to define the inferior border of the RT field is recommended to avoid irradiating the EAS.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/578243
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yi-Jen Chen
Michelle B. Chen
Alan J. Liu
Julian Sanchez
Peter Tsai
An Liu
spellingShingle Yi-Jen Chen
Michelle B. Chen
Alan J. Liu
Julian Sanchez
Peter Tsai
An Liu
Dosimetric Coverage of the External Anal Sphincter by 3-Dimensional Conformal Fields in Rectal Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation: Implications for the Concept of Sphincter-Preserving Radiation Therapy
BioMed Research International
author_facet Yi-Jen Chen
Michelle B. Chen
Alan J. Liu
Julian Sanchez
Peter Tsai
An Liu
author_sort Yi-Jen Chen
title Dosimetric Coverage of the External Anal Sphincter by 3-Dimensional Conformal Fields in Rectal Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation: Implications for the Concept of Sphincter-Preserving Radiation Therapy
title_short Dosimetric Coverage of the External Anal Sphincter by 3-Dimensional Conformal Fields in Rectal Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation: Implications for the Concept of Sphincter-Preserving Radiation Therapy
title_full Dosimetric Coverage of the External Anal Sphincter by 3-Dimensional Conformal Fields in Rectal Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation: Implications for the Concept of Sphincter-Preserving Radiation Therapy
title_fullStr Dosimetric Coverage of the External Anal Sphincter by 3-Dimensional Conformal Fields in Rectal Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation: Implications for the Concept of Sphincter-Preserving Radiation Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric Coverage of the External Anal Sphincter by 3-Dimensional Conformal Fields in Rectal Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation: Implications for the Concept of Sphincter-Preserving Radiation Therapy
title_sort dosimetric coverage of the external anal sphincter by 3-dimensional conformal fields in rectal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation: implications for the concept of sphincter-preserving radiation therapy
publisher Hindawi Limited
series BioMed Research International
issn 2314-6133
2314-6141
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Background. We evaluated the anatomic location of the external anal sphincter (EAS) to pelvic bony landmarks related to 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DRT) and studied the dosimetric coverage of the EAS in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Methods. Sixty-four consecutive rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation were included. All patients were treated in a prone position on a bellyboard by 3DRT. The inferior border of the RT fields was at least 3–5 cm inferior to the gross tumorous volume (GTV) or at the inferior border of the obturator foramen (IBOF), whichever was more inferior. The EAS was contoured and dose distributions were determined using dose-volume histograms. Results. In 53 out of 64 cases (82.8%), the EAS was completely inferior to the IBOF. In the remaining 11 cases, the EAS was either overlapping the IBOF (10 cases; 15.6%) or completely superior to the IBOF (1 case; 1.7%). The average mean dose delivered to the EAS was 2795 cGy. Lower mean doses were delivered to the EAS when the center of the EAS was located more distant from the GTV. Conclusions. Meticulous planning to define the inferior border of the RT field is recommended to avoid irradiating the EAS.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/578243
work_keys_str_mv AT yijenchen dosimetriccoverageoftheexternalanalsphincterby3dimensionalconformalfieldsinrectalcancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemoradiationimplicationsfortheconceptofsphincterpreservingradiationtherapy
AT michellebchen dosimetriccoverageoftheexternalanalsphincterby3dimensionalconformalfieldsinrectalcancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemoradiationimplicationsfortheconceptofsphincterpreservingradiationtherapy
AT alanjliu dosimetriccoverageoftheexternalanalsphincterby3dimensionalconformalfieldsinrectalcancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemoradiationimplicationsfortheconceptofsphincterpreservingradiationtherapy
AT juliansanchez dosimetriccoverageoftheexternalanalsphincterby3dimensionalconformalfieldsinrectalcancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemoradiationimplicationsfortheconceptofsphincterpreservingradiationtherapy
AT petertsai dosimetriccoverageoftheexternalanalsphincterby3dimensionalconformalfieldsinrectalcancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemoradiationimplicationsfortheconceptofsphincterpreservingradiationtherapy
AT anliu dosimetriccoverageoftheexternalanalsphincterby3dimensionalconformalfieldsinrectalcancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemoradiationimplicationsfortheconceptofsphincterpreservingradiationtherapy
_version_ 1724946168591417344