Propolis: A New Alternative for Root Canal Disinfection

Introduction: This study evaluated and compared colony forming units (CFUs) and minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of calcium hydroxide and propolis as intracanal medicaments. Materials and Methods: Eighty human single-root and caries-free teeth were selected and divided into five groups. Crow...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maryam Zare Jahromi, Hasan Toubayani, Majid Rezaei
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Iranian Association of Endodontists; Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2012-07-01
Series:Iranian Endodontic Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/index.php/iej/article/view/3415/3065
id doaj-12651bbf2f0948c08f453b1d11b47d81
record_format Article
spelling doaj-12651bbf2f0948c08f453b1d11b47d812020-11-24T21:54:47ZengIranian Association of Endodontists; Iranian Center for Endodontic ResearchIranian Endodontic Journal1735-74972008-27462012-07-0173127133Propolis: A New Alternative for Root Canal DisinfectionMaryam Zare JahromiHasan ToubayaniMajid RezaeiIntroduction: This study evaluated and compared colony forming units (CFUs) and minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of calcium hydroxide and propolis as intracanal medicaments. Materials and Methods: Eighty human single-root and caries-free teeth were selected and divided into five groups. Crowns were removed. Root canals were then prepared in a step-back manner. The samples were then inoculated by Enterococcus (E.) faecalis and incubated for 21 days. Intracanal medications were applied including, calcium hydroxide (n=20), propolis (n=20), and ethanol (n=20). Two groups of 10 teeth were also used as the positive and negative controls. Microbiological sampling was performed utilizing a piezo-reamer drill after one week of incubation. The samples were plated and CFUs were counted after 48 hours. MICs of calcium hydroxide and propolis were measured by serial dilution and agar dilution methods, respectively. The statistical tests of ANOVA and Duncan post-hoc were used to compare different medications. Results: MICs and CFUs of propolis were dramatically less than calcium hydroxide. The difference between the groups was statistically significant (P<0.001). Conclusion: Our results reveal that propolis is an effective antimicrobial intracanal agent.http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/index.php/iej/article/view/3415/3065Calcium HydroxideDisinfectionEnterococcus faecalisPropolisRoot Canal
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maryam Zare Jahromi
Hasan Toubayani
Majid Rezaei
spellingShingle Maryam Zare Jahromi
Hasan Toubayani
Majid Rezaei
Propolis: A New Alternative for Root Canal Disinfection
Iranian Endodontic Journal
Calcium Hydroxide
Disinfection
Enterococcus faecalis
Propolis
Root Canal
author_facet Maryam Zare Jahromi
Hasan Toubayani
Majid Rezaei
author_sort Maryam Zare Jahromi
title Propolis: A New Alternative for Root Canal Disinfection
title_short Propolis: A New Alternative for Root Canal Disinfection
title_full Propolis: A New Alternative for Root Canal Disinfection
title_fullStr Propolis: A New Alternative for Root Canal Disinfection
title_full_unstemmed Propolis: A New Alternative for Root Canal Disinfection
title_sort propolis: a new alternative for root canal disinfection
publisher Iranian Association of Endodontists; Iranian Center for Endodontic Research
series Iranian Endodontic Journal
issn 1735-7497
2008-2746
publishDate 2012-07-01
description Introduction: This study evaluated and compared colony forming units (CFUs) and minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of calcium hydroxide and propolis as intracanal medicaments. Materials and Methods: Eighty human single-root and caries-free teeth were selected and divided into five groups. Crowns were removed. Root canals were then prepared in a step-back manner. The samples were then inoculated by Enterococcus (E.) faecalis and incubated for 21 days. Intracanal medications were applied including, calcium hydroxide (n=20), propolis (n=20), and ethanol (n=20). Two groups of 10 teeth were also used as the positive and negative controls. Microbiological sampling was performed utilizing a piezo-reamer drill after one week of incubation. The samples were plated and CFUs were counted after 48 hours. MICs of calcium hydroxide and propolis were measured by serial dilution and agar dilution methods, respectively. The statistical tests of ANOVA and Duncan post-hoc were used to compare different medications. Results: MICs and CFUs of propolis were dramatically less than calcium hydroxide. The difference between the groups was statistically significant (P<0.001). Conclusion: Our results reveal that propolis is an effective antimicrobial intracanal agent.
topic Calcium Hydroxide
Disinfection
Enterococcus faecalis
Propolis
Root Canal
url http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/index.php/iej/article/view/3415/3065
work_keys_str_mv AT maryamzarejahromi propolisanewalternativeforrootcanaldisinfection
AT hasantoubayani propolisanewalternativeforrootcanaldisinfection
AT majidrezaei propolisanewalternativeforrootcanaldisinfection
_version_ 1725865824124665856