The is and ought of the ethics of neuroenhancement: Mind the gap
Ethical perspectives on the use of stimulants to enhance human cognitive performance (neuroenhancement) are polarized between conservative and liberal theories offering opposing advice on whether individuals have a right to use neuroenhancers and what the social outcomes of neuroenhancement might be...
Main Authors: | Cynthia eForlini, Wayne Denis Hall |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016-01-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01998/full |
Similar Items
-
The Medical Ethics of Cognitive Neuroenhancement
by: Erick H. Cheung, et al.
Published: (2015-07-01) -
Promises and Perils of Neuroenhancement and its Perspectives for Military Ethics
by: Marcin Orzechowski, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01) -
Just “Like Coffee” or Neuroenhancement by Stimulants?
by: Andreas G. Franke, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01) -
Chapter 11 Moral Neuroenhancement
by: Douglas, Thomas
Published: (2018) -
Neuroenhancement and the Strength Model of Self-Control
by: Chris eEnglert, et al.
Published: (2015-09-01)