Form and Content in Buber’s and Schweid’s Literary-Philosophical Readings of Genesis

The following essay is presented as part of a long-term project concerned with the theory and practice of modern Jewish thinkers as interpreters of the Bible. The recent Bible commentaries of Eliezer Schweid, who is one of the foremost Jewish scholars and theologians active in Israel today, are anal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jonathan Cohen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-06-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/10/6/398
id doaj-1277d54248254ff786adcf42ccd0cc3e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1277d54248254ff786adcf42ccd0cc3e2020-11-24T21:54:17ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442019-06-0110639810.3390/rel10060398rel10060398Form and Content in Buber’s and Schweid’s Literary-Philosophical Readings of GenesisJonathan Cohen0Department of Education, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91905, IsraelThe following essay is presented as part of a long-term project concerned with the theory and practice of modern Jewish thinkers as interpreters of the Bible. The recent Bible commentaries of Eliezer Schweid, who is one of the foremost Jewish scholars and theologians active in Israel today, are analyzed in comparison with parallel interpretations of Martin Buber, with special reference to the first chapters of Genesis. Their respective analyses of Biblical narrative reveal notable similarities in their treatment of the literary “body” of the text as the key to its theological significance. Nonetheless, Buber articulates religious experience largely “from the human side,” striving to mediate Biblical consciousness to the contemporary humanistic mindset, while Schweid positions himself more as the clarion of the “prophetic writers” for whom the fear of God, no less than the love of God, must inform an authentic religious sensibility. Schweid’s more theocentric perspective has great import for contemporary issues such as the universal covetousness engendered by the violation of our ecological covenant with the Earth.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/10/6/398Bible interpretationpost-criticismform and contentCreationembodied languageconcepts and symbolsdialoguetheocentrism
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jonathan Cohen
spellingShingle Jonathan Cohen
Form and Content in Buber’s and Schweid’s Literary-Philosophical Readings of Genesis
Religions
Bible interpretation
post-criticism
form and content
Creation
embodied language
concepts and symbols
dialogue
theocentrism
author_facet Jonathan Cohen
author_sort Jonathan Cohen
title Form and Content in Buber’s and Schweid’s Literary-Philosophical Readings of Genesis
title_short Form and Content in Buber’s and Schweid’s Literary-Philosophical Readings of Genesis
title_full Form and Content in Buber’s and Schweid’s Literary-Philosophical Readings of Genesis
title_fullStr Form and Content in Buber’s and Schweid’s Literary-Philosophical Readings of Genesis
title_full_unstemmed Form and Content in Buber’s and Schweid’s Literary-Philosophical Readings of Genesis
title_sort form and content in buber’s and schweid’s literary-philosophical readings of genesis
publisher MDPI AG
series Religions
issn 2077-1444
publishDate 2019-06-01
description The following essay is presented as part of a long-term project concerned with the theory and practice of modern Jewish thinkers as interpreters of the Bible. The recent Bible commentaries of Eliezer Schweid, who is one of the foremost Jewish scholars and theologians active in Israel today, are analyzed in comparison with parallel interpretations of Martin Buber, with special reference to the first chapters of Genesis. Their respective analyses of Biblical narrative reveal notable similarities in their treatment of the literary “body” of the text as the key to its theological significance. Nonetheless, Buber articulates religious experience largely “from the human side,” striving to mediate Biblical consciousness to the contemporary humanistic mindset, while Schweid positions himself more as the clarion of the “prophetic writers” for whom the fear of God, no less than the love of God, must inform an authentic religious sensibility. Schweid’s more theocentric perspective has great import for contemporary issues such as the universal covetousness engendered by the violation of our ecological covenant with the Earth.
topic Bible interpretation
post-criticism
form and content
Creation
embodied language
concepts and symbols
dialogue
theocentrism
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/10/6/398
work_keys_str_mv AT jonathancohen formandcontentinbubersandschweidsliteraryphilosophicalreadingsofgenesis
_version_ 1725867942050004992