The association of the <it>PON1 </it>Q192R polymorphism with coronary heart disease: findings from the British Women's Heart and Health cohort study and a meta-analysis

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>There have been inconsistent results from case-control studies assessing the association of the <it>PON1 </it>Q192R polymorphism with coronary heart disease (CHD). Most studies have included predominantly men and the asso...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kiessling Matthew, Briggs Patricia J, Hinks Lesley J, Gaunt Tom R, Day Ian NM, Lawlor Debbie A, Timpson Nick, Smith George, Ebrahim Shah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2004-06-01
Series:BMC Genetics
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2156/5/17
id doaj-12885fa745dd495b9a7271ebfaaa2067
record_format Article
spelling doaj-12885fa745dd495b9a7271ebfaaa20672020-11-25T03:25:09ZengBMCBMC Genetics1471-21562004-06-01511710.1186/1471-2156-5-17The association of the <it>PON1 </it>Q192R polymorphism with coronary heart disease: findings from the British Women's Heart and Health cohort study and a meta-analysisKiessling MatthewBriggs Patricia JHinks Lesley JGaunt Tom RDay Ian NMLawlor Debbie ATimpson NickSmith GeorgeEbrahim Shah<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>There have been inconsistent results from case-control studies assessing the association of the <it>PON1 </it>Q192R polymorphism with coronary heart disease (CHD). Most studies have included predominantly men and the association in women is unclear. Since lipid levels vary between the sexes the antioxidant effect of PON1 and any genes associated with it may also vary by sex. We have examined the association of the <it>PON1 </it>Q192R polymorphism with CHD in a large cohort of British women and combined the results from our cohort study with those from all other published studies.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The distribution of genotypes was the same among women with CHD and those without disease. The odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of having CHD comparing those with either the QR or RR genotype to those with QQ genotype (dominant model of association) was 1.03 (0.89, 1.21) and the per allele odds ratio was 0.98 (0.95, 1.01). In a meta-analysis of this and 38 other published studies (10,738 cases and 17,068 controls) the pooled odds ratio for the dominant effect was 1.14 (1.08, 1.20) and for the per allele effect was 1.10 (1.06, 1.13). There was evidence of small study bias in the meta-analyses and the dominant effect among those studies with 500 or more cases was 1.05 (0.96, 1.15). Ethnicity and reporting of whether the genotyping was done blind to the participants clinical status also contributed to heterogeneity between studies, but there was no difference in effect between studies with 50% or more women compared to those with fewer women and no difference between studies of healthy populations compared to those at high risk (with diabetes, renal disease of familial hypercholesterolaemia).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>There is no robust evidence that the <it>PON1 </it>Q192R polymorphism is associated with CHD risk in Caucasian women or men.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2156/5/17
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kiessling Matthew
Briggs Patricia J
Hinks Lesley J
Gaunt Tom R
Day Ian NM
Lawlor Debbie A
Timpson Nick
Smith George
Ebrahim Shah
spellingShingle Kiessling Matthew
Briggs Patricia J
Hinks Lesley J
Gaunt Tom R
Day Ian NM
Lawlor Debbie A
Timpson Nick
Smith George
Ebrahim Shah
The association of the <it>PON1 </it>Q192R polymorphism with coronary heart disease: findings from the British Women's Heart and Health cohort study and a meta-analysis
BMC Genetics
author_facet Kiessling Matthew
Briggs Patricia J
Hinks Lesley J
Gaunt Tom R
Day Ian NM
Lawlor Debbie A
Timpson Nick
Smith George
Ebrahim Shah
author_sort Kiessling Matthew
title The association of the <it>PON1 </it>Q192R polymorphism with coronary heart disease: findings from the British Women's Heart and Health cohort study and a meta-analysis
title_short The association of the <it>PON1 </it>Q192R polymorphism with coronary heart disease: findings from the British Women's Heart and Health cohort study and a meta-analysis
title_full The association of the <it>PON1 </it>Q192R polymorphism with coronary heart disease: findings from the British Women's Heart and Health cohort study and a meta-analysis
title_fullStr The association of the <it>PON1 </it>Q192R polymorphism with coronary heart disease: findings from the British Women's Heart and Health cohort study and a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The association of the <it>PON1 </it>Q192R polymorphism with coronary heart disease: findings from the British Women's Heart and Health cohort study and a meta-analysis
title_sort association of the <it>pon1 </it>q192r polymorphism with coronary heart disease: findings from the british women's heart and health cohort study and a meta-analysis
publisher BMC
series BMC Genetics
issn 1471-2156
publishDate 2004-06-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>There have been inconsistent results from case-control studies assessing the association of the <it>PON1 </it>Q192R polymorphism with coronary heart disease (CHD). Most studies have included predominantly men and the association in women is unclear. Since lipid levels vary between the sexes the antioxidant effect of PON1 and any genes associated with it may also vary by sex. We have examined the association of the <it>PON1 </it>Q192R polymorphism with CHD in a large cohort of British women and combined the results from our cohort study with those from all other published studies.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The distribution of genotypes was the same among women with CHD and those without disease. The odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of having CHD comparing those with either the QR or RR genotype to those with QQ genotype (dominant model of association) was 1.03 (0.89, 1.21) and the per allele odds ratio was 0.98 (0.95, 1.01). In a meta-analysis of this and 38 other published studies (10,738 cases and 17,068 controls) the pooled odds ratio for the dominant effect was 1.14 (1.08, 1.20) and for the per allele effect was 1.10 (1.06, 1.13). There was evidence of small study bias in the meta-analyses and the dominant effect among those studies with 500 or more cases was 1.05 (0.96, 1.15). Ethnicity and reporting of whether the genotyping was done blind to the participants clinical status also contributed to heterogeneity between studies, but there was no difference in effect between studies with 50% or more women compared to those with fewer women and no difference between studies of healthy populations compared to those at high risk (with diabetes, renal disease of familial hypercholesterolaemia).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>There is no robust evidence that the <it>PON1 </it>Q192R polymorphism is associated with CHD risk in Caucasian women or men.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2156/5/17
work_keys_str_mv AT kiesslingmatthew theassociationoftheitpon1itq192rpolymorphismwithcoronaryheartdiseasefindingsfromthebritishwomensheartandhealthcohortstudyandametaanalysis
AT briggspatriciaj theassociationoftheitpon1itq192rpolymorphismwithcoronaryheartdiseasefindingsfromthebritishwomensheartandhealthcohortstudyandametaanalysis
AT hinkslesleyj theassociationoftheitpon1itq192rpolymorphismwithcoronaryheartdiseasefindingsfromthebritishwomensheartandhealthcohortstudyandametaanalysis
AT gaunttomr theassociationoftheitpon1itq192rpolymorphismwithcoronaryheartdiseasefindingsfromthebritishwomensheartandhealthcohortstudyandametaanalysis
AT dayiannm theassociationoftheitpon1itq192rpolymorphismwithcoronaryheartdiseasefindingsfromthebritishwomensheartandhealthcohortstudyandametaanalysis
AT lawlordebbiea theassociationoftheitpon1itq192rpolymorphismwithcoronaryheartdiseasefindingsfromthebritishwomensheartandhealthcohortstudyandametaanalysis
AT timpsonnick theassociationoftheitpon1itq192rpolymorphismwithcoronaryheartdiseasefindingsfromthebritishwomensheartandhealthcohortstudyandametaanalysis
AT smithgeorge theassociationoftheitpon1itq192rpolymorphismwithcoronaryheartdiseasefindingsfromthebritishwomensheartandhealthcohortstudyandametaanalysis
AT ebrahimshah theassociationoftheitpon1itq192rpolymorphismwithcoronaryheartdiseasefindingsfromthebritishwomensheartandhealthcohortstudyandametaanalysis
AT kiesslingmatthew associationoftheitpon1itq192rpolymorphismwithcoronaryheartdiseasefindingsfromthebritishwomensheartandhealthcohortstudyandametaanalysis
AT briggspatriciaj associationoftheitpon1itq192rpolymorphismwithcoronaryheartdiseasefindingsfromthebritishwomensheartandhealthcohortstudyandametaanalysis
AT hinkslesleyj associationoftheitpon1itq192rpolymorphismwithcoronaryheartdiseasefindingsfromthebritishwomensheartandhealthcohortstudyandametaanalysis
AT gaunttomr associationoftheitpon1itq192rpolymorphismwithcoronaryheartdiseasefindingsfromthebritishwomensheartandhealthcohortstudyandametaanalysis
AT dayiannm associationoftheitpon1itq192rpolymorphismwithcoronaryheartdiseasefindingsfromthebritishwomensheartandhealthcohortstudyandametaanalysis
AT lawlordebbiea associationoftheitpon1itq192rpolymorphismwithcoronaryheartdiseasefindingsfromthebritishwomensheartandhealthcohortstudyandametaanalysis
AT timpsonnick associationoftheitpon1itq192rpolymorphismwithcoronaryheartdiseasefindingsfromthebritishwomensheartandhealthcohortstudyandametaanalysis
AT smithgeorge associationoftheitpon1itq192rpolymorphismwithcoronaryheartdiseasefindingsfromthebritishwomensheartandhealthcohortstudyandametaanalysis
AT ebrahimshah associationoftheitpon1itq192rpolymorphismwithcoronaryheartdiseasefindingsfromthebritishwomensheartandhealthcohortstudyandametaanalysis
_version_ 1724598753466253312