The Iportance of Agglutination tests versus ELISA in the diagnosis of brucellosis

Background: Brucellosis is one of the endemic and a Zoonotic disease of the Iran. Science the rapid diagnosis and quick treatment are very important, selection of a sensitive and specific test solving this problem is of a great importance. The main aim of this study is comparison of routine serologi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: abdolreza Esmaeilzadeh, hamid Baghchesaraei
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Lorestan University of Medical Science 2006-01-01
Series:Yafteh
Subjects:
Online Access:http://yafte.lums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-354&slc_lang=en&sid=1
id doaj-12bb216cdbbd43c780f89cf8d3bec601
record_format Article
spelling doaj-12bb216cdbbd43c780f89cf8d3bec6012020-11-25T01:22:02ZfasLorestan University of Medical ScienceYafteh1563-07732006-01-01711723The Iportance of Agglutination tests versus ELISA in the diagnosis of brucellosisabdolreza Esmaeilzadeh0hamid Baghchesaraei1 Background: Brucellosis is one of the endemic and a Zoonotic disease of the Iran. Science the rapid diagnosis and quick treatment are very important, selection of a sensitive and specific test solving this problem is of a great importance. The main aim of this study is comparison of routine serologic test with standard Elisa test. Materials and methods: In this survey, 176 suspected patients with conformed clinical signs, were selected and them routine diagnostic test like Wright (rapid), Standard tube agglutination (STA), Coombs Wright test and selective and quantitative Elisa test was performed for all sample referred to diagnostic laboratory. Findings: out of 176 sample, 92 (52.27%) were male and 84 (47.73%) female. On performing Wright (rapid), standard tube agglutination (STA), Coombs Wright and Elisa, 45 (25.57%), 49 (27.84%), 58 (32.95%) and 72 (40.91%) sample were positive respectively. The range of age distribution was 15-65 years. The geographical distribution of population is 72.4% rural and 27.6% of urban category. The sensitivity of above mentioned test as compare to Elisa was 62.5, 68.0 and 80.0 percent respectively with 100% of specificity for all. Conclusions: The Elisa posses the highest diagnostic value as compare to other routinely performed tests. After Elisa other test namely Coombs Wright, standard tube agglutination and Wright (rapid) respectively. Have the highest diagnostic value with consideration to above findings, it is obvious that due to ability to find quantitative value, determination of antibody classis and stage of disease, Elisa is the best method of choice in diagnosis of brucellosis.http://yafte.lums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-354&slc_lang=en&sid=1Brucellosis serological diagnosis Elisa Agglutination
collection DOAJ
language fas
format Article
sources DOAJ
author abdolreza Esmaeilzadeh
hamid Baghchesaraei
spellingShingle abdolreza Esmaeilzadeh
hamid Baghchesaraei
The Iportance of Agglutination tests versus ELISA in the diagnosis of brucellosis
Yafteh
Brucellosis
serological diagnosis
Elisa
Agglutination
author_facet abdolreza Esmaeilzadeh
hamid Baghchesaraei
author_sort abdolreza Esmaeilzadeh
title The Iportance of Agglutination tests versus ELISA in the diagnosis of brucellosis
title_short The Iportance of Agglutination tests versus ELISA in the diagnosis of brucellosis
title_full The Iportance of Agglutination tests versus ELISA in the diagnosis of brucellosis
title_fullStr The Iportance of Agglutination tests versus ELISA in the diagnosis of brucellosis
title_full_unstemmed The Iportance of Agglutination tests versus ELISA in the diagnosis of brucellosis
title_sort iportance of agglutination tests versus elisa in the diagnosis of brucellosis
publisher Lorestan University of Medical Science
series Yafteh
issn 1563-0773
publishDate 2006-01-01
description Background: Brucellosis is one of the endemic and a Zoonotic disease of the Iran. Science the rapid diagnosis and quick treatment are very important, selection of a sensitive and specific test solving this problem is of a great importance. The main aim of this study is comparison of routine serologic test with standard Elisa test. Materials and methods: In this survey, 176 suspected patients with conformed clinical signs, were selected and them routine diagnostic test like Wright (rapid), Standard tube agglutination (STA), Coombs Wright test and selective and quantitative Elisa test was performed for all sample referred to diagnostic laboratory. Findings: out of 176 sample, 92 (52.27%) were male and 84 (47.73%) female. On performing Wright (rapid), standard tube agglutination (STA), Coombs Wright and Elisa, 45 (25.57%), 49 (27.84%), 58 (32.95%) and 72 (40.91%) sample were positive respectively. The range of age distribution was 15-65 years. The geographical distribution of population is 72.4% rural and 27.6% of urban category. The sensitivity of above mentioned test as compare to Elisa was 62.5, 68.0 and 80.0 percent respectively with 100% of specificity for all. Conclusions: The Elisa posses the highest diagnostic value as compare to other routinely performed tests. After Elisa other test namely Coombs Wright, standard tube agglutination and Wright (rapid) respectively. Have the highest diagnostic value with consideration to above findings, it is obvious that due to ability to find quantitative value, determination of antibody classis and stage of disease, Elisa is the best method of choice in diagnosis of brucellosis.
topic Brucellosis
serological diagnosis
Elisa
Agglutination
url http://yafte.lums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-354&slc_lang=en&sid=1
work_keys_str_mv AT abdolrezaesmaeilzadeh theiportanceofagglutinationtestsversuselisainthediagnosisofbrucellosis
AT hamidbaghchesaraei theiportanceofagglutinationtestsversuselisainthediagnosisofbrucellosis
AT abdolrezaesmaeilzadeh iportanceofagglutinationtestsversuselisainthediagnosisofbrucellosis
AT hamidbaghchesaraei iportanceofagglutinationtestsversuselisainthediagnosisofbrucellosis
_version_ 1725128213510750208