A comparison of stereotactic and tomosynthesis‐guided localisation of impalpable breast lesions

Abstract Introduction Impalpable breast cancers require precise pre‐operative lesion localisation to minimise re‐excision rates. Conventional techniques include hookwire insertion using stereotactic guidance. Newer techniques include the use of tomosynthesis guidance and the use of iodine‐125 seeds....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carolyn Madeley, Meredith Kessell, Chris Madeley, Donna Taylor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-09-01
Series:Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.348
id doaj-12bc4e64534245a9bd67942c7549f5ff
record_format Article
spelling doaj-12bc4e64534245a9bd67942c7549f5ff2020-11-25T03:41:35ZengWileyJournal of Medical Radiation Sciences2051-38952051-39092019-09-0166317017610.1002/jmrs.348A comparison of stereotactic and tomosynthesis‐guided localisation of impalpable breast lesionsCarolyn Madeley0Meredith Kessell1Chris Madeley2Donna Taylor3Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Royal Perth Hospital Perth Western Australia AustraliaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Royal Perth Hospital Perth Western Australia AustraliaSEA Pty LTD Perth Western Australia AustraliaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Royal Perth Hospital Perth Western Australia AustraliaAbstract Introduction Impalpable breast cancers require precise pre‐operative lesion localisation to minimise re‐excision rates. Conventional techniques include hookwire insertion using stereotactic guidance. Newer techniques include the use of tomosynthesis guidance and the use of iodine‐125 seeds. This study compares the accuracy of lesion localisation with hookwire or seed insertion using prone stereotactic or upright tomosynthesis guidance. Methods This registered quality improvement activity did not require formal ethics approval. The post‐localisation images for 116 lesions were reviewed. The distance from the lesion or breast biopsy marker to the hookwire or seed was measured on post‐insertion mammograms. The relative placement accuracy of hookwire or seed using prone stereotactic or upright tomosynthesis guidance was compared. A lesion to seed or wire distance > 10 mm was considered technically unsatisfactory. Results 94.8% of the seeds and wires inserted via prone stereotactic guidance were accurately placed, compared with 89.6% of those inserted via upright tomosynthesis. There were twice as many technically unsatisfactory insertions under upright tomosynthesis guidance. The majority of the unsatisfactory insertions using upright tomosynthesis occurred when the lesion was at or below the level of the nipple and the insertion was performed craniocaudally. Conclusion The degree of accuracy of pre‐operative localisation of impalpable breast lesions is significantly higher with the use of prone stereotactic rather than upright tomosynthesis guidance. This was most evident with the placement of I‐125 seeds, and in cases where the target lesion was located below the level of the nipple.https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.348accuracybreastlesion localisationstereotactictomosynthesis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Carolyn Madeley
Meredith Kessell
Chris Madeley
Donna Taylor
spellingShingle Carolyn Madeley
Meredith Kessell
Chris Madeley
Donna Taylor
A comparison of stereotactic and tomosynthesis‐guided localisation of impalpable breast lesions
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
accuracy
breast
lesion localisation
stereotactic
tomosynthesis
author_facet Carolyn Madeley
Meredith Kessell
Chris Madeley
Donna Taylor
author_sort Carolyn Madeley
title A comparison of stereotactic and tomosynthesis‐guided localisation of impalpable breast lesions
title_short A comparison of stereotactic and tomosynthesis‐guided localisation of impalpable breast lesions
title_full A comparison of stereotactic and tomosynthesis‐guided localisation of impalpable breast lesions
title_fullStr A comparison of stereotactic and tomosynthesis‐guided localisation of impalpable breast lesions
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of stereotactic and tomosynthesis‐guided localisation of impalpable breast lesions
title_sort comparison of stereotactic and tomosynthesis‐guided localisation of impalpable breast lesions
publisher Wiley
series Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
issn 2051-3895
2051-3909
publishDate 2019-09-01
description Abstract Introduction Impalpable breast cancers require precise pre‐operative lesion localisation to minimise re‐excision rates. Conventional techniques include hookwire insertion using stereotactic guidance. Newer techniques include the use of tomosynthesis guidance and the use of iodine‐125 seeds. This study compares the accuracy of lesion localisation with hookwire or seed insertion using prone stereotactic or upright tomosynthesis guidance. Methods This registered quality improvement activity did not require formal ethics approval. The post‐localisation images for 116 lesions were reviewed. The distance from the lesion or breast biopsy marker to the hookwire or seed was measured on post‐insertion mammograms. The relative placement accuracy of hookwire or seed using prone stereotactic or upright tomosynthesis guidance was compared. A lesion to seed or wire distance > 10 mm was considered technically unsatisfactory. Results 94.8% of the seeds and wires inserted via prone stereotactic guidance were accurately placed, compared with 89.6% of those inserted via upright tomosynthesis. There were twice as many technically unsatisfactory insertions under upright tomosynthesis guidance. The majority of the unsatisfactory insertions using upright tomosynthesis occurred when the lesion was at or below the level of the nipple and the insertion was performed craniocaudally. Conclusion The degree of accuracy of pre‐operative localisation of impalpable breast lesions is significantly higher with the use of prone stereotactic rather than upright tomosynthesis guidance. This was most evident with the placement of I‐125 seeds, and in cases where the target lesion was located below the level of the nipple.
topic accuracy
breast
lesion localisation
stereotactic
tomosynthesis
url https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.348
work_keys_str_mv AT carolynmadeley acomparisonofstereotacticandtomosynthesisguidedlocalisationofimpalpablebreastlesions
AT meredithkessell acomparisonofstereotacticandtomosynthesisguidedlocalisationofimpalpablebreastlesions
AT chrismadeley acomparisonofstereotacticandtomosynthesisguidedlocalisationofimpalpablebreastlesions
AT donnataylor acomparisonofstereotacticandtomosynthesisguidedlocalisationofimpalpablebreastlesions
AT carolynmadeley comparisonofstereotacticandtomosynthesisguidedlocalisationofimpalpablebreastlesions
AT meredithkessell comparisonofstereotacticandtomosynthesisguidedlocalisationofimpalpablebreastlesions
AT chrismadeley comparisonofstereotacticandtomosynthesisguidedlocalisationofimpalpablebreastlesions
AT donnataylor comparisonofstereotacticandtomosynthesisguidedlocalisationofimpalpablebreastlesions
_version_ 1724529486643331072