Improve process safety in undergraduate education

The IChemE Safety Centre (ISC) has undertaken some work to develop a list of desired learning outcomes for undergraduate chemical engineers. The project consisted of determining industries expectation of process safety education and presenting those expectations to a range of universities. That cons...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zsuzsanna Gyenes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AIDIC Servizi S.r.l. 2019-09-01
Series:Chemical Engineering Transactions
Online Access:https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/10095
id doaj-12e90c0ab56b43a9b3da419dd67882fc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-12e90c0ab56b43a9b3da419dd67882fc2021-02-16T21:00:43ZengAIDIC Servizi S.r.l.Chemical Engineering Transactions2283-92162019-09-017710.3303/CET1977067Improve process safety in undergraduate educationZsuzsanna GyenesThe IChemE Safety Centre (ISC) has undertaken some work to develop a list of desired learning outcomes for undergraduate chemical engineers. The project consisted of determining industries expectation of process safety education and presenting those expectations to a range of universities. That consultation led to a document stating the expectations as well as highlighting some information and resources to assist universities in reaching the goal. A benchmarking exercise was launched by the ISC to understand how well these learning outcomes fit into the existing curricula of contributing universities. The overall scope of the exercise is to review each element listed in the guidance document and see if they fulfil the criteria and objective of any undergraduate Chemical Engineering course. The participants assess the learning outcomes regardless of whether process safety is delivered as single subject or integrated in other courses. The learning outcomes includes four sections around Process Safety. Three of them cover classroom learning, meanwhile the last section characterises how Process Safety is applied in practice, for example laboratory activities, design projects and industrial training placements. This paper discusses the outcome of the benchmarking exercise; it presents whether the learning outcome can be applied and serve as a complete teaching package in Process Safety as a guidance. Universities are welcome to decide if the document supports the education and serves as a good reference or they need additional information/guidance to complete such course.https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/10095
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zsuzsanna Gyenes
spellingShingle Zsuzsanna Gyenes
Improve process safety in undergraduate education
Chemical Engineering Transactions
author_facet Zsuzsanna Gyenes
author_sort Zsuzsanna Gyenes
title Improve process safety in undergraduate education
title_short Improve process safety in undergraduate education
title_full Improve process safety in undergraduate education
title_fullStr Improve process safety in undergraduate education
title_full_unstemmed Improve process safety in undergraduate education
title_sort improve process safety in undergraduate education
publisher AIDIC Servizi S.r.l.
series Chemical Engineering Transactions
issn 2283-9216
publishDate 2019-09-01
description The IChemE Safety Centre (ISC) has undertaken some work to develop a list of desired learning outcomes for undergraduate chemical engineers. The project consisted of determining industries expectation of process safety education and presenting those expectations to a range of universities. That consultation led to a document stating the expectations as well as highlighting some information and resources to assist universities in reaching the goal. A benchmarking exercise was launched by the ISC to understand how well these learning outcomes fit into the existing curricula of contributing universities. The overall scope of the exercise is to review each element listed in the guidance document and see if they fulfil the criteria and objective of any undergraduate Chemical Engineering course. The participants assess the learning outcomes regardless of whether process safety is delivered as single subject or integrated in other courses. The learning outcomes includes four sections around Process Safety. Three of them cover classroom learning, meanwhile the last section characterises how Process Safety is applied in practice, for example laboratory activities, design projects and industrial training placements. This paper discusses the outcome of the benchmarking exercise; it presents whether the learning outcome can be applied and serve as a complete teaching package in Process Safety as a guidance. Universities are welcome to decide if the document supports the education and serves as a good reference or they need additional information/guidance to complete such course.
url https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/10095
work_keys_str_mv AT zsuzsannagyenes improveprocesssafetyinundergraduateeducation
_version_ 1724266443783012352