The role of psychological and physiological factors in decision making under risk and in a dilemma

Different methods to elicit risk attitudes of individuals often provide differing results despite a common theory. Reasons for such inconsistencies may be the different influence of underlying factors in risk-taking decisions. In order to evaluate this conjecture, a better understanding of underlyin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jonas eFooken, Markus eSchaffner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00002/full
id doaj-13070b7d6649408089e89f8df948406d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-13070b7d6649408089e89f8df948406d2020-11-24T21:36:26ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience1662-51532016-01-011010.3389/fnbeh.2016.00002164942The role of psychological and physiological factors in decision making under risk and in a dilemmaJonas eFooken0Markus eSchaffner1Joint Research CentreQueensland University of TechnologyDifferent methods to elicit risk attitudes of individuals often provide differing results despite a common theory. Reasons for such inconsistencies may be the different influence of underlying factors in risk-taking decisions. In order to evaluate this conjecture, a better understanding of underlying factors across methods and decision contexts is desirable. In this paper we study the difference in result of two different risk elicitation methods by linking estimates of risk attitudes to gender, age and personality traits, which have been shown to be related. We also investigate the role of these factors during decision-making in a dilemma situation. For these two decision contexts we also investigate the decision-maker's physiological state during the decision, measured by heart rate variability (HRV), which we use as an indicator of emotional involvement. We found that the two elicitation methods provide different individual risk attitude measures which is partly reflected in a different gender effect between the methods. Personality traits explain only relatively little in terms of driving risk attitudes and the difference between methods. We also found that risk taking and the physiological state are related for one of the methods, suggesting that more emotionally involved individuals are more risk averse in the experiment. Finally, we found evidence that personality traits are connected to whether individuals made a decision in the dilemma situation, but risk attitudes and the physiological state were not indicative for the ability to decide in this decision context.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00002/fullrisk-takingHRV analysispersonality traitsphysiological measuresElicitation methodsdilemma decision
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jonas eFooken
Markus eSchaffner
spellingShingle Jonas eFooken
Markus eSchaffner
The role of psychological and physiological factors in decision making under risk and in a dilemma
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
risk-taking
HRV analysis
personality traits
physiological measures
Elicitation methods
dilemma decision
author_facet Jonas eFooken
Markus eSchaffner
author_sort Jonas eFooken
title The role of psychological and physiological factors in decision making under risk and in a dilemma
title_short The role of psychological and physiological factors in decision making under risk and in a dilemma
title_full The role of psychological and physiological factors in decision making under risk and in a dilemma
title_fullStr The role of psychological and physiological factors in decision making under risk and in a dilemma
title_full_unstemmed The role of psychological and physiological factors in decision making under risk and in a dilemma
title_sort role of psychological and physiological factors in decision making under risk and in a dilemma
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
issn 1662-5153
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Different methods to elicit risk attitudes of individuals often provide differing results despite a common theory. Reasons for such inconsistencies may be the different influence of underlying factors in risk-taking decisions. In order to evaluate this conjecture, a better understanding of underlying factors across methods and decision contexts is desirable. In this paper we study the difference in result of two different risk elicitation methods by linking estimates of risk attitudes to gender, age and personality traits, which have been shown to be related. We also investigate the role of these factors during decision-making in a dilemma situation. For these two decision contexts we also investigate the decision-maker's physiological state during the decision, measured by heart rate variability (HRV), which we use as an indicator of emotional involvement. We found that the two elicitation methods provide different individual risk attitude measures which is partly reflected in a different gender effect between the methods. Personality traits explain only relatively little in terms of driving risk attitudes and the difference between methods. We also found that risk taking and the physiological state are related for one of the methods, suggesting that more emotionally involved individuals are more risk averse in the experiment. Finally, we found evidence that personality traits are connected to whether individuals made a decision in the dilemma situation, but risk attitudes and the physiological state were not indicative for the ability to decide in this decision context.
topic risk-taking
HRV analysis
personality traits
physiological measures
Elicitation methods
dilemma decision
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00002/full
work_keys_str_mv AT jonasefooken theroleofpsychologicalandphysiologicalfactorsindecisionmakingunderriskandinadilemma
AT markuseschaffner theroleofpsychologicalandphysiologicalfactorsindecisionmakingunderriskandinadilemma
AT jonasefooken roleofpsychologicalandphysiologicalfactorsindecisionmakingunderriskandinadilemma
AT markuseschaffner roleofpsychologicalandphysiologicalfactorsindecisionmakingunderriskandinadilemma
_version_ 1725941056213614592