Efficacy of Ecabet Sodium for Helicobacter pylori Eradication with Sequential Therapy

Background/Aims: We aimed to compare the outcomes of Helicobacter pylori eradication in patients receiving sequential therapy (ST) depending on the use of ecabet sodium (ES). Materials and Methods : Between January to December 2015, 176 patients randomly received either ST alone (n=72) or 10-day ES...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seol So, Ji Yong Ahn, Hee Kyong Na, Kee Wook Jung, Jeong Hoon Lee, Do Hoon Kim, Kee Don Choi, Ho June Song, Gin Hyug Lee, Hwoon-Yong Jung
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Yong Chan Lee 2018-09-01
Series:The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.helicojournal.org/journal/view.html?doi=10.7704/kjhugr.2018.18.3.180
Description
Summary:Background/Aims: We aimed to compare the outcomes of Helicobacter pylori eradication in patients receiving sequential therapy (ST) depending on the use of ecabet sodium (ES). Materials and Methods : Between January to December 2015, 176 patients randomly received either ST alone (n=72) or 10-day ES therapy combined with ST (n=104). After applying the exclusion criteria, 56 patients were finally assigned to the ST-only group and 84 to the ST with ES group. We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed the H. pylori eradication rate and adverse events between the two groups. Results : Among the 140 patients, 121 (86.4%) achieved successful H. pylori eradication and 24 (17.1%) had adverse events. Eradication was achieved in 50 patients (89.3%) in the ST-only group and in 71 patients (84.5%) in the ST with ES group (P=0.420). No significant difference in the incidence of adverse events was found between the ST-only and ST with ES groups (12.5% vs. 20.2%, respectively; P=0.234). However, the ST with ES group tended to have a higher prevalence of nausea or vomiting than the ST-only group (11.9% vs. 1.8%; P=0.050). Conclusions : ST showed a good H. pylori eradication rate without deteriorating the adverse events regardless of adding ES.
ISSN:1738-3331