Psychometric performance of the PROMIS® depression item bank: a comparison of the 28- and 51-item versions using Rasch measurement theory

Abstract Purpose The aim of this study is to illustrate an example application of Rach Measurement Theory (RMT) in the evaluation of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. RMT diagnostic methods were applied to evaluate the PROMIS® Depression items as part of a series of papers applying different...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sophie Cleanthous, Skye Pamela Barbic, Sarah Smith, Antoine Regnault
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2019-07-01
Series:Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41687-019-0131-4
id doaj-132255cbb2c741d0be14cef77006d71e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-132255cbb2c741d0be14cef77006d71e2020-11-25T03:48:43ZengSpringerOpenJournal of Patient-Reported Outcomes2509-80202019-07-013111210.1186/s41687-019-0131-4Psychometric performance of the PROMIS® depression item bank: a comparison of the 28- and 51-item versions using Rasch measurement theorySophie Cleanthous0Skye Pamela Barbic1Sarah Smith2Antoine Regnault3Modus Outcomes Ltd, UK OfficeFaculty of Medicine, Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British ColumbiaDepartment of Health Services Research & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical MedicineModus Outcomes SAS FR OfficeAbstract Purpose The aim of this study is to illustrate an example application of Rach Measurement Theory (RMT) in the evaluation of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. RMT diagnostic methods were applied to evaluate the PROMIS® Depression items as part of a series of papers applying different psychometric paradigms in parallel to the same data. Methods RMT was used to examine scale-to-sample targeting, scale performance and sample measurement of two PROMIS depression item pools including respectively 28 and 51- items. Results Sub-optimal but improved targeting was displayed in the 51-item pool which covered 27% of the range of depression measured in the sample compared to only 15% in the 28-item bank, further reducing the sample percentage with lower depression not covered by the scale (28% Vs 34%). Satisfactory scale performance was observed by the 28-item bank with marginal item misfit. However, deviations from the RMT criteria in the 51-itempool were observed including: 9 reversed thresholds; 12 misfitting items and 12 item-pairs displaying dependency. Overall reliability was good for sets of items (Person Separation Index = 0.93 and 0.95), but sub-optimal sample measurement (17% Vs 19% fit residuals outside of the recommended range). Conclusions The RMT approach in this exercise provided evidence that compared to the 28-item bank, the extended 51-item version of the PROMIS depression, improved sample-to-scale targeting. However, targeting in the lower end of the concept of interest remained sub-optimal and scale performance deteriorated. There may be a need to improve the conceptual breadth of the construct under investigation to ensure the inclusion of items that capture the full range of the concept of interest for this context of use.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41687-019-0131-4PROMISDepressionPsychometricsRasch measurement theoryRasch model
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sophie Cleanthous
Skye Pamela Barbic
Sarah Smith
Antoine Regnault
spellingShingle Sophie Cleanthous
Skye Pamela Barbic
Sarah Smith
Antoine Regnault
Psychometric performance of the PROMIS® depression item bank: a comparison of the 28- and 51-item versions using Rasch measurement theory
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
PROMIS
Depression
Psychometrics
Rasch measurement theory
Rasch model
author_facet Sophie Cleanthous
Skye Pamela Barbic
Sarah Smith
Antoine Regnault
author_sort Sophie Cleanthous
title Psychometric performance of the PROMIS® depression item bank: a comparison of the 28- and 51-item versions using Rasch measurement theory
title_short Psychometric performance of the PROMIS® depression item bank: a comparison of the 28- and 51-item versions using Rasch measurement theory
title_full Psychometric performance of the PROMIS® depression item bank: a comparison of the 28- and 51-item versions using Rasch measurement theory
title_fullStr Psychometric performance of the PROMIS® depression item bank: a comparison of the 28- and 51-item versions using Rasch measurement theory
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric performance of the PROMIS® depression item bank: a comparison of the 28- and 51-item versions using Rasch measurement theory
title_sort psychometric performance of the promis® depression item bank: a comparison of the 28- and 51-item versions using rasch measurement theory
publisher SpringerOpen
series Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
issn 2509-8020
publishDate 2019-07-01
description Abstract Purpose The aim of this study is to illustrate an example application of Rach Measurement Theory (RMT) in the evaluation of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. RMT diagnostic methods were applied to evaluate the PROMIS® Depression items as part of a series of papers applying different psychometric paradigms in parallel to the same data. Methods RMT was used to examine scale-to-sample targeting, scale performance and sample measurement of two PROMIS depression item pools including respectively 28 and 51- items. Results Sub-optimal but improved targeting was displayed in the 51-item pool which covered 27% of the range of depression measured in the sample compared to only 15% in the 28-item bank, further reducing the sample percentage with lower depression not covered by the scale (28% Vs 34%). Satisfactory scale performance was observed by the 28-item bank with marginal item misfit. However, deviations from the RMT criteria in the 51-itempool were observed including: 9 reversed thresholds; 12 misfitting items and 12 item-pairs displaying dependency. Overall reliability was good for sets of items (Person Separation Index = 0.93 and 0.95), but sub-optimal sample measurement (17% Vs 19% fit residuals outside of the recommended range). Conclusions The RMT approach in this exercise provided evidence that compared to the 28-item bank, the extended 51-item version of the PROMIS depression, improved sample-to-scale targeting. However, targeting in the lower end of the concept of interest remained sub-optimal and scale performance deteriorated. There may be a need to improve the conceptual breadth of the construct under investigation to ensure the inclusion of items that capture the full range of the concept of interest for this context of use.
topic PROMIS
Depression
Psychometrics
Rasch measurement theory
Rasch model
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41687-019-0131-4
work_keys_str_mv AT sophiecleanthous psychometricperformanceofthepromisdepressionitembankacomparisonofthe28and51itemversionsusingraschmeasurementtheory
AT skyepamelabarbic psychometricperformanceofthepromisdepressionitembankacomparisonofthe28and51itemversionsusingraschmeasurementtheory
AT sarahsmith psychometricperformanceofthepromisdepressionitembankacomparisonofthe28and51itemversionsusingraschmeasurementtheory
AT antoineregnault psychometricperformanceofthepromisdepressionitembankacomparisonofthe28and51itemversionsusingraschmeasurementtheory
_version_ 1724497529325748224