Are published randomized clinical trials abstracts on periodontics reported adequately?
Introduction: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) remain the golden standard in biomedical research, which makes their reporting to a high quality essential to control RCTs’ internal validity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of abstract reporting of RCTs published in periodontic...
Main Authors: | Fahad Alharbi, Abdullah Almutairi |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S245186542030140X |
Similar Items
-
Methodological quality of clinical trials in pediatric dentistry research published in ISI journals, 2008-2012.
by: Ana Jaime, et al.
Published: (2015-04-01) -
Ozone Gel in Chronic Periodontal Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial on the Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Ozone Application
by: Marco Colombo, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01) -
Core outcomes in periodontal trials: study protocol for core outcome set development
by: Thomas J. Lamont, et al.
Published: (2017-09-01) -
Do Lasers Have an Adjunctive Role in Initial Non-Surgical Periodontal Therapy? A Systematic Review
by: Donald Coluzzi, et al.
Published: (2020-08-01) -
Critical appraisal of reporting randomized clinical trials published in Iranian dental journals during 2003-2010.
by: Raha Habib Agahi, et al.
Published: (2014-06-01)