Forward models and state estimation in compensatory eye movements

The compensatory eye movement system maintains a stable retinal image, integrating information from different sensory modalities to compensate for head movements. Inspired by recent models of physiology of limb movements, we suggest that compensatory eye movements (CEM) can be modeled as a control s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maarten A Frens, Opher Donchin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2009-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
Subjects:
okr
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/neuro.03.013.2009/full
id doaj-1330ea08e40c4484ae8115170046b4dd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1330ea08e40c4484ae8115170046b4dd2020-11-24T23:21:56ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience1662-51022009-11-01310.3389/neuro.03.013.2009718Forward models and state estimation in compensatory eye movementsMaarten A Frens0Opher Donchin1Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus Medical CenterDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Ben Gurion University of the NegevThe compensatory eye movement system maintains a stable retinal image, integrating information from different sensory modalities to compensate for head movements. Inspired by recent models of physiology of limb movements, we suggest that compensatory eye movements (CEM) can be modeled as a control system with three essential building blocks: a forward model that predicts the effects of motor commands; a state estimator that integrates sensory feedback into this prediction; and, a feedback controller that translates a state estimate into motor commands. We propose a specific mapping of nuclei within the CEM system onto these control functions. Specifically, we suggest that the Flocculus is responsible for generating the forward model prediction and that the Vestibular Nuclei integrate sensory feedback to generate an estimate of current state. Finally, the brainstem motor nuclei – in the case of horizontal compensation this means the Abducens Nucleus and the Nucleus Prepositus Hypoglossi – implement a feedback controller, translating state into motor commands. While these efforts to understand the physiological control system as a feedback control system are in their infancy, there is the intriguing possibility that compensatory eye movements and targeted voluntary movements use the same cerebellar circuitry in fundamentally different ways.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/neuro.03.013.2009/fullCerebellumEye MovementsModelcontrol systemsforward modelokr
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maarten A Frens
Opher Donchin
spellingShingle Maarten A Frens
Opher Donchin
Forward models and state estimation in compensatory eye movements
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
Cerebellum
Eye Movements
Model
control systems
forward model
okr
author_facet Maarten A Frens
Opher Donchin
author_sort Maarten A Frens
title Forward models and state estimation in compensatory eye movements
title_short Forward models and state estimation in compensatory eye movements
title_full Forward models and state estimation in compensatory eye movements
title_fullStr Forward models and state estimation in compensatory eye movements
title_full_unstemmed Forward models and state estimation in compensatory eye movements
title_sort forward models and state estimation in compensatory eye movements
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
issn 1662-5102
publishDate 2009-11-01
description The compensatory eye movement system maintains a stable retinal image, integrating information from different sensory modalities to compensate for head movements. Inspired by recent models of physiology of limb movements, we suggest that compensatory eye movements (CEM) can be modeled as a control system with three essential building blocks: a forward model that predicts the effects of motor commands; a state estimator that integrates sensory feedback into this prediction; and, a feedback controller that translates a state estimate into motor commands. We propose a specific mapping of nuclei within the CEM system onto these control functions. Specifically, we suggest that the Flocculus is responsible for generating the forward model prediction and that the Vestibular Nuclei integrate sensory feedback to generate an estimate of current state. Finally, the brainstem motor nuclei – in the case of horizontal compensation this means the Abducens Nucleus and the Nucleus Prepositus Hypoglossi – implement a feedback controller, translating state into motor commands. While these efforts to understand the physiological control system as a feedback control system are in their infancy, there is the intriguing possibility that compensatory eye movements and targeted voluntary movements use the same cerebellar circuitry in fundamentally different ways.
topic Cerebellum
Eye Movements
Model
control systems
forward model
okr
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/neuro.03.013.2009/full
work_keys_str_mv AT maartenafrens forwardmodelsandstateestimationincompensatoryeyemovements
AT opherdonchin forwardmodelsandstateestimationincompensatoryeyemovements
_version_ 1725569330834309120