Patient Involvement in Medical Education Research: Results From an International Survey of Medical Education Researchers

There are demands to involve patients in medical education research (MER). This study surveyed researchers to examine the extent and nature of patient involvement in MER. It obtained 283 completed surveys (response rate of 5%). Of the respondents, 153 (54.1%) indicated that they involve patients in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katherine A Moreau PhD, Kaylee Eady PhD, Sarah E Heath PhD(c)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Patient Experience
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2374373520981484
id doaj-137eee1b5a5442a4b0699dc637e1e30a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-137eee1b5a5442a4b0699dc637e1e30a2021-01-14T00:03:27ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Patient Experience2374-37432021-01-01810.1177/2374373520981484Patient Involvement in Medical Education Research: Results From an International Survey of Medical Education ResearchersKatherine A Moreau PhD0Kaylee Eady PhD1Sarah E Heath PhD(c)2 Faculty of Education, , Ontario, Canada Centre for Research on Educational and Community Services, , Ontario, Canada Faculty of Education, , Ontario, CanadaThere are demands to involve patients in medical education research (MER). This study surveyed researchers to examine the extent and nature of patient involvement in MER. It obtained 283 completed surveys (response rate of 5%). Of the respondents, 153 (54.1%) indicated that they involve patients in MER. Of these respondents, 102 (66.7%) stated that patients are data sources in MER, 41 (26.8%) noted that patients are involved as advisors and/or reviewers, and/or 22 (14.4%) indicated that patients are involved as team members. These respondents reported that they involve patients to improve the relevance of their MER to patients (n = 99; 64.7%), connect MER to patient outcomes (n = 98; 64.1%), and improve the appropriateness of MER (n = 92; 60.1%). The 130 respondents who do not involve patients in MER do not involve them because they believe that their research topic(s) are irrelevant to patients (n = 68; 52.3%), they have limited resources for patient involvement (n = 40; 30.8%), and/or they do not know how to involve patients (n = 28; 21.5%). Researchers need to consider how they can conduct their MER with patients.https://doi.org/10.1177/2374373520981484
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Katherine A Moreau PhD
Kaylee Eady PhD
Sarah E Heath PhD(c)
spellingShingle Katherine A Moreau PhD
Kaylee Eady PhD
Sarah E Heath PhD(c)
Patient Involvement in Medical Education Research: Results From an International Survey of Medical Education Researchers
Journal of Patient Experience
author_facet Katherine A Moreau PhD
Kaylee Eady PhD
Sarah E Heath PhD(c)
author_sort Katherine A Moreau PhD
title Patient Involvement in Medical Education Research: Results From an International Survey of Medical Education Researchers
title_short Patient Involvement in Medical Education Research: Results From an International Survey of Medical Education Researchers
title_full Patient Involvement in Medical Education Research: Results From an International Survey of Medical Education Researchers
title_fullStr Patient Involvement in Medical Education Research: Results From an International Survey of Medical Education Researchers
title_full_unstemmed Patient Involvement in Medical Education Research: Results From an International Survey of Medical Education Researchers
title_sort patient involvement in medical education research: results from an international survey of medical education researchers
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Patient Experience
issn 2374-3743
publishDate 2021-01-01
description There are demands to involve patients in medical education research (MER). This study surveyed researchers to examine the extent and nature of patient involvement in MER. It obtained 283 completed surveys (response rate of 5%). Of the respondents, 153 (54.1%) indicated that they involve patients in MER. Of these respondents, 102 (66.7%) stated that patients are data sources in MER, 41 (26.8%) noted that patients are involved as advisors and/or reviewers, and/or 22 (14.4%) indicated that patients are involved as team members. These respondents reported that they involve patients to improve the relevance of their MER to patients (n = 99; 64.7%), connect MER to patient outcomes (n = 98; 64.1%), and improve the appropriateness of MER (n = 92; 60.1%). The 130 respondents who do not involve patients in MER do not involve them because they believe that their research topic(s) are irrelevant to patients (n = 68; 52.3%), they have limited resources for patient involvement (n = 40; 30.8%), and/or they do not know how to involve patients (n = 28; 21.5%). Researchers need to consider how they can conduct their MER with patients.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2374373520981484
work_keys_str_mv AT katherineamoreauphd patientinvolvementinmedicaleducationresearchresultsfromaninternationalsurveyofmedicaleducationresearchers
AT kayleeeadyphd patientinvolvementinmedicaleducationresearchresultsfromaninternationalsurveyofmedicaleducationresearchers
AT saraheheathphdc patientinvolvementinmedicaleducationresearchresultsfromaninternationalsurveyofmedicaleducationresearchers
_version_ 1724338648607883264