Why cauldrons come first: taxonomic transparency in the earliest Chinese antiquarian catalogues
The term ‘antiquarianism’ is increasingly being deployed as an analytical heuristic for comparing different world traditions of thinking about old things. Central to almost all characterizations of “Chinese antiquarianism” is the construction of a pedigree stretching back to the inventories and cata...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Department of Art History, University of Birmingham
2014-12-01
|
Series: | Journal of Art Historiography |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/moser.pdf |
id |
doaj-13a379aa7efc405988865c3a588945a9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-13a379aa7efc405988865c3a588945a92020-11-24T23:17:17ZengDepartment of Art History, University of BirminghamJournal of Art Historiography2042-47522014-12-011111JM1Why cauldrons come first: taxonomic transparency in the earliest Chinese antiquarian cataloguesJeffrey Moser0McGillThe term ‘antiquarianism’ is increasingly being deployed as an analytical heuristic for comparing different world traditions of thinking about old things. Central to almost all characterizations of “Chinese antiquarianism” is the construction of a pedigree stretching back to the inventories and catalogs of antiquities produced during the Northern Song dynasty (960-1127). Close comparison reveals significant ideological differences between the values implicit in the earliest Chinese inventories of two-dimensional inscriptions on metal and stone, and those underlying catalogues of three-dimensional antiquities like bronzes. By situating these differences within the wider intellectual milieu of the Northern Song, this essay explains how the unique ‘taxonomic transparency’ of ancient bronzes reinforced Neo-Confucianism’s conquest of the Chinese ideological landscape at the dawn of the second millennium.https://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/moser.pdfSong dynastyantiquarianismarchaeologybronzesepigraphyinventoryritualantiquity |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jeffrey Moser |
spellingShingle |
Jeffrey Moser Why cauldrons come first: taxonomic transparency in the earliest Chinese antiquarian catalogues Journal of Art Historiography Song dynasty antiquarianism archaeology bronzes epigraphy inventory ritual antiquity |
author_facet |
Jeffrey Moser |
author_sort |
Jeffrey Moser |
title |
Why cauldrons come first: taxonomic transparency in the earliest Chinese antiquarian catalogues |
title_short |
Why cauldrons come first: taxonomic transparency in the earliest Chinese antiquarian catalogues |
title_full |
Why cauldrons come first: taxonomic transparency in the earliest Chinese antiquarian catalogues |
title_fullStr |
Why cauldrons come first: taxonomic transparency in the earliest Chinese antiquarian catalogues |
title_full_unstemmed |
Why cauldrons come first: taxonomic transparency in the earliest Chinese antiquarian catalogues |
title_sort |
why cauldrons come first: taxonomic transparency in the earliest chinese antiquarian catalogues |
publisher |
Department of Art History, University of Birmingham |
series |
Journal of Art Historiography |
issn |
2042-4752 |
publishDate |
2014-12-01 |
description |
The term ‘antiquarianism’ is increasingly being deployed as an analytical heuristic for comparing different world traditions of thinking about old things. Central to almost all characterizations of “Chinese antiquarianism” is the construction of a pedigree stretching back to the inventories and catalogs of antiquities produced during the Northern Song dynasty (960-1127). Close comparison reveals significant ideological differences between the values implicit in the earliest Chinese inventories of two-dimensional inscriptions on metal and stone, and those underlying catalogues of three-dimensional antiquities like bronzes. By situating these differences within the wider intellectual milieu of the Northern Song, this essay explains how the unique ‘taxonomic transparency’ of ancient bronzes reinforced Neo-Confucianism’s conquest of the Chinese ideological landscape at the dawn of the second millennium. |
topic |
Song dynasty antiquarianism archaeology bronzes epigraphy inventory ritual antiquity |
url |
https://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/moser.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jeffreymoser whycauldronscomefirsttaxonomictransparencyintheearliestchineseantiquariancatalogues |
_version_ |
1725583847820623872 |