Nonunion of Fractures of the Ulna and Radius Diaphyses: Clinical and Radiological Results of Surgical Treatment

Aseptic nonunion of the radius and ulna is a major complication of forearm fractures, accounting for 2% to 10% of all forearm fractures. The aim of our study is to evaluate the functional and radiological results of surgical treatment of diaphyseal aseptic nonunion of the radius and ulna, with autol...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Boussakri H, Elibrahimi A, Bachiri M, Elidrissi M, Shimi M
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Malaysian Orthopaedic Association 2016-07-01
Series:Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://morthoj.org/2016/v10n2/ulna-and-radius-diaphyses.pdf
id doaj-13b70d40d74e489aa59cf6125e0438e3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-13b70d40d74e489aa59cf6125e0438e32021-05-02T12:53:59ZengMalaysian Orthopaedic AssociationMalaysian Orthopaedic Journal1985-25332016-07-011022734http://dx.doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1607.006Nonunion of Fractures of the Ulna and Radius Diaphyses: Clinical and Radiological Results of Surgical TreatmentBoussakri H0Elibrahimi A1Bachiri M2Elidrissi M3Shimi M4PrPrPrPrPrAseptic nonunion of the radius and ulna is a major complication of forearm fractures, accounting for 2% to 10% of all forearm fractures. The aim of our study is to evaluate the functional and radiological results of surgical treatment of diaphyseal aseptic nonunion of the radius and ulna, with autologous bone grafting, decortication and internal plate fixation. A series of 21 patients (26 nonunions) was retrospectively reviewed, the average age was 35 years with a mean of 31,58 years (range 12-44 years) . The fractures included isolated radius (n=6) and ulna (n=10), and both radius and ulna (n=5). The Grace and Eversmann score was used to evaluate our results. Fifteen had very good results, five good and one average. Consolidation of the two bones was attained in 6.2 months. Therefore, the functional prognosis of the upper limb imposes the need for an adequate treatment. This management strategy has enabled us to have satisfactory results. However, the best treatment of nonunion remains the preventive treatment with an optimal management and care of the forearm fractures.http://morthoj.org/2016/v10n2/ulna-and-radius-diaphyses.pdfRadius and ulnadiaphyseal fracturenonunion
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Boussakri H
Elibrahimi A
Bachiri M
Elidrissi M
Shimi M
spellingShingle Boussakri H
Elibrahimi A
Bachiri M
Elidrissi M
Shimi M
Nonunion of Fractures of the Ulna and Radius Diaphyses: Clinical and Radiological Results of Surgical Treatment
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal
Radius and ulna
diaphyseal fracture
nonunion
author_facet Boussakri H
Elibrahimi A
Bachiri M
Elidrissi M
Shimi M
author_sort Boussakri H
title Nonunion of Fractures of the Ulna and Radius Diaphyses: Clinical and Radiological Results of Surgical Treatment
title_short Nonunion of Fractures of the Ulna and Radius Diaphyses: Clinical and Radiological Results of Surgical Treatment
title_full Nonunion of Fractures of the Ulna and Radius Diaphyses: Clinical and Radiological Results of Surgical Treatment
title_fullStr Nonunion of Fractures of the Ulna and Radius Diaphyses: Clinical and Radiological Results of Surgical Treatment
title_full_unstemmed Nonunion of Fractures of the Ulna and Radius Diaphyses: Clinical and Radiological Results of Surgical Treatment
title_sort nonunion of fractures of the ulna and radius diaphyses: clinical and radiological results of surgical treatment
publisher Malaysian Orthopaedic Association
series Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal
issn 1985-2533
publishDate 2016-07-01
description Aseptic nonunion of the radius and ulna is a major complication of forearm fractures, accounting for 2% to 10% of all forearm fractures. The aim of our study is to evaluate the functional and radiological results of surgical treatment of diaphyseal aseptic nonunion of the radius and ulna, with autologous bone grafting, decortication and internal plate fixation. A series of 21 patients (26 nonunions) was retrospectively reviewed, the average age was 35 years with a mean of 31,58 years (range 12-44 years) . The fractures included isolated radius (n=6) and ulna (n=10), and both radius and ulna (n=5). The Grace and Eversmann score was used to evaluate our results. Fifteen had very good results, five good and one average. Consolidation of the two bones was attained in 6.2 months. Therefore, the functional prognosis of the upper limb imposes the need for an adequate treatment. This management strategy has enabled us to have satisfactory results. However, the best treatment of nonunion remains the preventive treatment with an optimal management and care of the forearm fractures.
topic Radius and ulna
diaphyseal fracture
nonunion
url http://morthoj.org/2016/v10n2/ulna-and-radius-diaphyses.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT boussakrih nonunionoffracturesoftheulnaandradiusdiaphysesclinicalandradiologicalresultsofsurgicaltreatment
AT elibrahimia nonunionoffracturesoftheulnaandradiusdiaphysesclinicalandradiologicalresultsofsurgicaltreatment
AT bachirim nonunionoffracturesoftheulnaandradiusdiaphysesclinicalandradiologicalresultsofsurgicaltreatment
AT elidrissim nonunionoffracturesoftheulnaandradiusdiaphysesclinicalandradiologicalresultsofsurgicaltreatment
AT shimim nonunionoffracturesoftheulnaandradiusdiaphysesclinicalandradiologicalresultsofsurgicaltreatment
_version_ 1721491252927528960