Stimulus Novelty Energizes Actions in the Absence of Explicit Reward.

Novelty seeking has been tied to impulsive choice and biased value based choice. It has been postulated that novel stimuli should trigger more vigorous approach and exploration. However, it is unclear whether stimulus novelty can enhance simple motor actions in the absence of explicit reward, a nece...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Raphael Koster, Tricia X Seow, Raymond J Dolan, Emrah Düzel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4944950?pdf=render
id doaj-13b9ee3c06194042b2e4f603dbaca126
record_format Article
spelling doaj-13b9ee3c06194042b2e4f603dbaca1262020-11-25T01:50:25ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01117e015912010.1371/journal.pone.0159120Stimulus Novelty Energizes Actions in the Absence of Explicit Reward.Raphael KosterTricia X SeowRaymond J DolanEmrah DüzelNovelty seeking has been tied to impulsive choice and biased value based choice. It has been postulated that novel stimuli should trigger more vigorous approach and exploration. However, it is unclear whether stimulus novelty can enhance simple motor actions in the absence of explicit reward, a necessary condition for energizing approach and exploration in an entirely unfamiliar situation. In this study human subjects were cued to omit or perform actions in form of button presses by novel or familiar images. We found that subjects' motor actions were faster when cued by a novel compared to a familiar image. This facilitation by novelty was strongest when the delay between cue and action was short, consistent with a link between novelty and impulsive choices. The facilitation of reaction times by novelty was correlated across subjects with trait novelty seeking as measured in the Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire. However, this li between high novelty-seeking and action facilitation was driven by trials with a long delay between cue and action. This prolonged time window of energization following novelty could hint at a mechanistic underpinning of enhanced vigour for approach and exploration frequently postulated for novelty seeking humans. In conclusion, we show that stimulus novelty enhances the speed of a cued motor action. We suggest this is likely to reflect an adaptation to changing environments but may also provide a source of maladaptive choice and impulsive behaviour.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4944950?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Raphael Koster
Tricia X Seow
Raymond J Dolan
Emrah Düzel
spellingShingle Raphael Koster
Tricia X Seow
Raymond J Dolan
Emrah Düzel
Stimulus Novelty Energizes Actions in the Absence of Explicit Reward.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Raphael Koster
Tricia X Seow
Raymond J Dolan
Emrah Düzel
author_sort Raphael Koster
title Stimulus Novelty Energizes Actions in the Absence of Explicit Reward.
title_short Stimulus Novelty Energizes Actions in the Absence of Explicit Reward.
title_full Stimulus Novelty Energizes Actions in the Absence of Explicit Reward.
title_fullStr Stimulus Novelty Energizes Actions in the Absence of Explicit Reward.
title_full_unstemmed Stimulus Novelty Energizes Actions in the Absence of Explicit Reward.
title_sort stimulus novelty energizes actions in the absence of explicit reward.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Novelty seeking has been tied to impulsive choice and biased value based choice. It has been postulated that novel stimuli should trigger more vigorous approach and exploration. However, it is unclear whether stimulus novelty can enhance simple motor actions in the absence of explicit reward, a necessary condition for energizing approach and exploration in an entirely unfamiliar situation. In this study human subjects were cued to omit or perform actions in form of button presses by novel or familiar images. We found that subjects' motor actions were faster when cued by a novel compared to a familiar image. This facilitation by novelty was strongest when the delay between cue and action was short, consistent with a link between novelty and impulsive choices. The facilitation of reaction times by novelty was correlated across subjects with trait novelty seeking as measured in the Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire. However, this li between high novelty-seeking and action facilitation was driven by trials with a long delay between cue and action. This prolonged time window of energization following novelty could hint at a mechanistic underpinning of enhanced vigour for approach and exploration frequently postulated for novelty seeking humans. In conclusion, we show that stimulus novelty enhances the speed of a cued motor action. We suggest this is likely to reflect an adaptation to changing environments but may also provide a source of maladaptive choice and impulsive behaviour.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4944950?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT raphaelkoster stimulusnoveltyenergizesactionsintheabsenceofexplicitreward
AT triciaxseow stimulusnoveltyenergizesactionsintheabsenceofexplicitreward
AT raymondjdolan stimulusnoveltyenergizesactionsintheabsenceofexplicitreward
AT emrahduzel stimulusnoveltyenergizesactionsintheabsenceofexplicitreward
_version_ 1725002023913390080