Transformation Research and the Longue Durée of 1989: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Data

In recent years, historians have increasingly looked at social science data in their search for sources to study the transformation period. Researchers hope that a secondary analysis of this data will expand the existing sources. This expansion promises new perspectives, while simultaneously bringin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kerstin Brückweh, Kathrin Zöller
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Lodz 2019-02-01
Series:Przeglad Socjologii Jakosciowej
Subjects:
Online Access:https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/socjak/article/view/4848
id doaj-13f5cf30660144189cf30f8160296f8d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-13f5cf30660144189cf30f8160296f8d2020-11-25T01:35:11ZengUniversity of LodzPrzeglad Socjologii Jakosciowej1733-80692019-02-01151729110.18778/1733-8069.15.1.054848Transformation Research and the Longue Durée of 1989: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative DataKerstin BrückwehKathrin ZöllerIn recent years, historians have increasingly looked at social science data in their search for sources to study the transformation period. Researchers hope that a secondary analysis of this data will expand the existing sources. This expansion promises new perspectives, while simultaneously bringing new methodological challenges to the discipline. This article deals with both: 1. It uses a history of knowledge approach to evaluate the topics and tools of transformation research. It also argues that social scientists were not only producers of knowledge but historical actors in the restructuring of the institutions of social sciences in East Germany after 1989/90. 2. With the German Socio-Economic Panel and especially the Saxonian Longitudinal Study as an example, the article refers to the content of the studies itself – in this case, the East German school as a site of life-worlds in upheaval. It concludes that the encounter of social scientists and historians is very fruitful for historians interested in the interaction of system change and everyday life. That is, the secondary analysis of qualitative and quantitative social science data compliments ‘classical’ sources of historical research by providing insights into memories and experiences at different times in the historical process.https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/socjak/article/view/4848transformationcontemporary historysecondary analysishistory of knowledgeEast Germanyschool/educationpanel studies
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kerstin Brückweh
Kathrin Zöller
spellingShingle Kerstin Brückweh
Kathrin Zöller
Transformation Research and the Longue Durée of 1989: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Data
Przeglad Socjologii Jakosciowej
transformation
contemporary history
secondary analysis
history of knowledge
East Germany
school/education
panel studies
author_facet Kerstin Brückweh
Kathrin Zöller
author_sort Kerstin Brückweh
title Transformation Research and the Longue Durée of 1989: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Data
title_short Transformation Research and the Longue Durée of 1989: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Data
title_full Transformation Research and the Longue Durée of 1989: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Data
title_fullStr Transformation Research and the Longue Durée of 1989: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Data
title_full_unstemmed Transformation Research and the Longue Durée of 1989: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Data
title_sort transformation research and the longue durée of 1989: combining qualitative and quantitative data
publisher University of Lodz
series Przeglad Socjologii Jakosciowej
issn 1733-8069
publishDate 2019-02-01
description In recent years, historians have increasingly looked at social science data in their search for sources to study the transformation period. Researchers hope that a secondary analysis of this data will expand the existing sources. This expansion promises new perspectives, while simultaneously bringing new methodological challenges to the discipline. This article deals with both: 1. It uses a history of knowledge approach to evaluate the topics and tools of transformation research. It also argues that social scientists were not only producers of knowledge but historical actors in the restructuring of the institutions of social sciences in East Germany after 1989/90. 2. With the German Socio-Economic Panel and especially the Saxonian Longitudinal Study as an example, the article refers to the content of the studies itself – in this case, the East German school as a site of life-worlds in upheaval. It concludes that the encounter of social scientists and historians is very fruitful for historians interested in the interaction of system change and everyday life. That is, the secondary analysis of qualitative and quantitative social science data compliments ‘classical’ sources of historical research by providing insights into memories and experiences at different times in the historical process.
topic transformation
contemporary history
secondary analysis
history of knowledge
East Germany
school/education
panel studies
url https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/socjak/article/view/4848
work_keys_str_mv AT kerstinbruckweh transformationresearchandthelonguedureeof1989combiningqualitativeandquantitativedata
AT kathrinzoller transformationresearchandthelonguedureeof1989combiningqualitativeandquantitativedata
_version_ 1725067936053329920