Rationale and design of the HEALTHY-CATH trial: A randomised controlled trial of Heparin versus EthAnol Lock THerapY for the prevention of Catheter Associated infecTion in Haemodialysis patients

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Catheter-related bacteraemias (CRBs) contribute significantly to morbidity, mortality and health care costs in dialysis populations. Despite international guidelines recommending avoidance of catheters for haemodialysis access, hospi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Broom Jennifer K, O'Shea Stacey, Govindarajulu Sridevi, Playford E Geoffrey, Hawley Carmel M, Isbel Nicole M, Campbell Scott B, Mudge David W, Carpenter Sally, Johnson Barbara C, Underwood Neil P, Johnson David W
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-08-01
Series:BMC Nephrology
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/10/23
id doaj-140acc07ca22489297a9b0d8ff43cbb7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-140acc07ca22489297a9b0d8ff43cbb72020-11-25T00:33:43ZengBMCBMC Nephrology1471-23692009-08-011012310.1186/1471-2369-10-23Rationale and design of the HEALTHY-CATH trial: A randomised controlled trial of Heparin versus EthAnol Lock THerapY for the prevention of Catheter Associated infecTion in Haemodialysis patientsBroom Jennifer KO'Shea StaceyGovindarajulu SrideviPlayford E GeoffreyHawley Carmel MIsbel Nicole MCampbell Scott BMudge David WCarpenter SallyJohnson Barbara CUnderwood Neil PJohnson David W<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Catheter-related bacteraemias (CRBs) contribute significantly to morbidity, mortality and health care costs in dialysis populations. Despite international guidelines recommending avoidance of catheters for haemodialysis access, hospital admissions for CRBs have doubled in the last decade. The primary aim of the study is to determine whether weekly instillation of 70% ethanol prevents CRBs compared with standard heparin saline.</p> <p>Methods/design</p> <p>The study will follow a prospective, open-label, randomized controlled design. Inclusion criteria are adult patients with incident or prevalent tunneled intravenous dialysis catheters on three times weekly haemodialysis, with no current evidence of catheter infection and no personal, cultural or religious objection to ethanol use, who are on adequate contraception and are able to give informed consent. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive 3 mL of intravenous-grade 70% ethanol into each lumen of the catheter once a week and standard heparin locks for other dialysis days, or to receive heparin locks only. The primary outcome measure will be time to the first episode of CRB, which will be defined using standard objective criteria. Secondary outcomes will include adverse reactions, incidence of CRB caused by different pathogens, time to infection-related catheter removal, time to exit site infections and costs. Prospective power calculations indicate that the study will have 80% statistical power to detect a clinically significant increase in median infection-free survival from 200 days to 400 days if 56 patients are recruited into each arm.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>This investigator-initiated study has been designed to provide evidence to help nephrologists reduce the incidence of CRBs in haemodialysis patients with tunnelled intravenous catheters.</p> <p>Trial Registration</p> <p>Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Number: ACTRN12609000493246</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/10/23
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Broom Jennifer K
O'Shea Stacey
Govindarajulu Sridevi
Playford E Geoffrey
Hawley Carmel M
Isbel Nicole M
Campbell Scott B
Mudge David W
Carpenter Sally
Johnson Barbara C
Underwood Neil P
Johnson David W
spellingShingle Broom Jennifer K
O'Shea Stacey
Govindarajulu Sridevi
Playford E Geoffrey
Hawley Carmel M
Isbel Nicole M
Campbell Scott B
Mudge David W
Carpenter Sally
Johnson Barbara C
Underwood Neil P
Johnson David W
Rationale and design of the HEALTHY-CATH trial: A randomised controlled trial of Heparin versus EthAnol Lock THerapY for the prevention of Catheter Associated infecTion in Haemodialysis patients
BMC Nephrology
author_facet Broom Jennifer K
O'Shea Stacey
Govindarajulu Sridevi
Playford E Geoffrey
Hawley Carmel M
Isbel Nicole M
Campbell Scott B
Mudge David W
Carpenter Sally
Johnson Barbara C
Underwood Neil P
Johnson David W
author_sort Broom Jennifer K
title Rationale and design of the HEALTHY-CATH trial: A randomised controlled trial of Heparin versus EthAnol Lock THerapY for the prevention of Catheter Associated infecTion in Haemodialysis patients
title_short Rationale and design of the HEALTHY-CATH trial: A randomised controlled trial of Heparin versus EthAnol Lock THerapY for the prevention of Catheter Associated infecTion in Haemodialysis patients
title_full Rationale and design of the HEALTHY-CATH trial: A randomised controlled trial of Heparin versus EthAnol Lock THerapY for the prevention of Catheter Associated infecTion in Haemodialysis patients
title_fullStr Rationale and design of the HEALTHY-CATH trial: A randomised controlled trial of Heparin versus EthAnol Lock THerapY for the prevention of Catheter Associated infecTion in Haemodialysis patients
title_full_unstemmed Rationale and design of the HEALTHY-CATH trial: A randomised controlled trial of Heparin versus EthAnol Lock THerapY for the prevention of Catheter Associated infecTion in Haemodialysis patients
title_sort rationale and design of the healthy-cath trial: a randomised controlled trial of heparin versus ethanol lock therapy for the prevention of catheter associated infection in haemodialysis patients
publisher BMC
series BMC Nephrology
issn 1471-2369
publishDate 2009-08-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Catheter-related bacteraemias (CRBs) contribute significantly to morbidity, mortality and health care costs in dialysis populations. Despite international guidelines recommending avoidance of catheters for haemodialysis access, hospital admissions for CRBs have doubled in the last decade. The primary aim of the study is to determine whether weekly instillation of 70% ethanol prevents CRBs compared with standard heparin saline.</p> <p>Methods/design</p> <p>The study will follow a prospective, open-label, randomized controlled design. Inclusion criteria are adult patients with incident or prevalent tunneled intravenous dialysis catheters on three times weekly haemodialysis, with no current evidence of catheter infection and no personal, cultural or religious objection to ethanol use, who are on adequate contraception and are able to give informed consent. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive 3 mL of intravenous-grade 70% ethanol into each lumen of the catheter once a week and standard heparin locks for other dialysis days, or to receive heparin locks only. The primary outcome measure will be time to the first episode of CRB, which will be defined using standard objective criteria. Secondary outcomes will include adverse reactions, incidence of CRB caused by different pathogens, time to infection-related catheter removal, time to exit site infections and costs. Prospective power calculations indicate that the study will have 80% statistical power to detect a clinically significant increase in median infection-free survival from 200 days to 400 days if 56 patients are recruited into each arm.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>This investigator-initiated study has been designed to provide evidence to help nephrologists reduce the incidence of CRBs in haemodialysis patients with tunnelled intravenous catheters.</p> <p>Trial Registration</p> <p>Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Number: ACTRN12609000493246</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/10/23
work_keys_str_mv AT broomjenniferk rationaleanddesignofthehealthycathtrialarandomisedcontrolledtrialofheparinversusethanollocktherapyforthepreventionofcatheterassociatedinfectioninhaemodialysispatients
AT osheastacey rationaleanddesignofthehealthycathtrialarandomisedcontrolledtrialofheparinversusethanollocktherapyforthepreventionofcatheterassociatedinfectioninhaemodialysispatients
AT govindarajulusridevi rationaleanddesignofthehealthycathtrialarandomisedcontrolledtrialofheparinversusethanollocktherapyforthepreventionofcatheterassociatedinfectioninhaemodialysispatients
AT playfordegeoffrey rationaleanddesignofthehealthycathtrialarandomisedcontrolledtrialofheparinversusethanollocktherapyforthepreventionofcatheterassociatedinfectioninhaemodialysispatients
AT hawleycarmelm rationaleanddesignofthehealthycathtrialarandomisedcontrolledtrialofheparinversusethanollocktherapyforthepreventionofcatheterassociatedinfectioninhaemodialysispatients
AT isbelnicolem rationaleanddesignofthehealthycathtrialarandomisedcontrolledtrialofheparinversusethanollocktherapyforthepreventionofcatheterassociatedinfectioninhaemodialysispatients
AT campbellscottb rationaleanddesignofthehealthycathtrialarandomisedcontrolledtrialofheparinversusethanollocktherapyforthepreventionofcatheterassociatedinfectioninhaemodialysispatients
AT mudgedavidw rationaleanddesignofthehealthycathtrialarandomisedcontrolledtrialofheparinversusethanollocktherapyforthepreventionofcatheterassociatedinfectioninhaemodialysispatients
AT carpentersally rationaleanddesignofthehealthycathtrialarandomisedcontrolledtrialofheparinversusethanollocktherapyforthepreventionofcatheterassociatedinfectioninhaemodialysispatients
AT johnsonbarbarac rationaleanddesignofthehealthycathtrialarandomisedcontrolledtrialofheparinversusethanollocktherapyforthepreventionofcatheterassociatedinfectioninhaemodialysispatients
AT underwoodneilp rationaleanddesignofthehealthycathtrialarandomisedcontrolledtrialofheparinversusethanollocktherapyforthepreventionofcatheterassociatedinfectioninhaemodialysispatients
AT johnsondavidw rationaleanddesignofthehealthycathtrialarandomisedcontrolledtrialofheparinversusethanollocktherapyforthepreventionofcatheterassociatedinfectioninhaemodialysispatients
_version_ 1725315204452974592