Study of high-speed-impact-induced conoidal fracture of Ti alloy layer in composite armor plate composed of Ti- and Al-alloy layers

• Main Authors: Peng-ru Li, Qun-bo Fan, Xin-jie Zhu, Hai-chao Gong
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. 2021-08-01
• Series: Defence Technology
• Subjects: Titanium alloy targets; Conoidal fracture; Stress triaxiality; Microscopic mechanism
• Online Access: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214914720304074

In order to understand the mechanism of conoidal fracture damage caused by a high-speed fragment-simulating projectile in titanium alloy layer of a composite armor plate composed of titanium- and aluminum-alloy layers, the ballistic interaction process was successfully simulated based on the Tuler–Butcher and GISSMO coupling failure model. The simulated conoidal fracture morphology was in good agreement with the three-dimensional industrial-computed-tomography image. Further, three main damage zones (zones I, II, and III) were identified besides the crater area, which are located respectively near the crater area, at the back of the target plate, and directly below the crater area. Under the high-speed-impact conditions, in zone II, cracks began to form at the end of the period of crack formation in zone I, but crack formation in zone III started before the end of crack formation in zone II. Further, the damage mechanism differed for different stress states. The microcracks in zone I were formed both by void connection and shear deformation. In the formation of zone I, the stress triaxiality ranged from −2.0 to −1.0, and the shear failure mechanism played a dominant role. The microcracks in zone II showed the combined features of shear deformation and void connection, and during the formation process, the stress triaxiality was between 0 and 0.5 with a mixed failure mode. Further, the microcracks in zone III showed obvious characteristics of void connection caused by local melting. During the zone III formation, the triaxiality was 1.0–1.9, and the ductile fracture mechanism was dominant, which also reflects the phenomenon of spallation.