Giving good directions: order of mention reflects visual salience

In complex stimuli, there are many different possible ways to refer to a specified target. Previousstudies have shown that when people are faced with such a task, the content of their referringexpression reflects visual properties such as size, salience and clutter. Here, we extend thesefindings and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alasdair Daniel Francis Clarke, Micha eElsner, Hannah eRohde
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01793/full
id doaj-144d9e60ddbe4784bbcd981712888660
record_format Article
spelling doaj-144d9e60ddbe4784bbcd9817128886602020-11-25T00:21:42ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782015-12-01610.3389/fpsyg.2015.01793165150Giving good directions: order of mention reflects visual salienceAlasdair Daniel Francis Clarke0Micha eElsner1Hannah eRohde2University of AberdeenOhio State UniversityUniversity of EdinburghIn complex stimuli, there are many different possible ways to refer to a specified target. Previousstudies have shown that when people are faced with such a task, the content of their referringexpression reflects visual properties such as size, salience and clutter. Here, we extend thesefindings and present evidence that (i) the influence of visual perception on sentence constructiongoes beyond content selection and in part determines the order in which different objects arementioned and (ii) order of mention influences comprehension. Study 1 (a corpus study ofreference productions) shows that when a speaker uses a relational description to mention asalient object, that object is treated as being in the common ground and is more likely to bementioned first. Study 2 (a visual search study) asks participants to listen to referring expressionsand find the specified target; in keeping with the above result, we find that search for easy-to-findtargets is faster when the target is mentioned first, while search for harder-to-find targets isfacilitated by mentioning the target later, after a landmark in a relational description. Our findingsshow that seemingly low-level and disparate mental modules like perception and sentenceplanning interact at a high level and in task-dependent ways.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01793/fullvisual searchinformation structureaudience designreferring expression generationvisual salience
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alasdair Daniel Francis Clarke
Micha eElsner
Hannah eRohde
spellingShingle Alasdair Daniel Francis Clarke
Micha eElsner
Hannah eRohde
Giving good directions: order of mention reflects visual salience
Frontiers in Psychology
visual search
information structure
audience design
referring expression generation
visual salience
author_facet Alasdair Daniel Francis Clarke
Micha eElsner
Hannah eRohde
author_sort Alasdair Daniel Francis Clarke
title Giving good directions: order of mention reflects visual salience
title_short Giving good directions: order of mention reflects visual salience
title_full Giving good directions: order of mention reflects visual salience
title_fullStr Giving good directions: order of mention reflects visual salience
title_full_unstemmed Giving good directions: order of mention reflects visual salience
title_sort giving good directions: order of mention reflects visual salience
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2015-12-01
description In complex stimuli, there are many different possible ways to refer to a specified target. Previousstudies have shown that when people are faced with such a task, the content of their referringexpression reflects visual properties such as size, salience and clutter. Here, we extend thesefindings and present evidence that (i) the influence of visual perception on sentence constructiongoes beyond content selection and in part determines the order in which different objects arementioned and (ii) order of mention influences comprehension. Study 1 (a corpus study ofreference productions) shows that when a speaker uses a relational description to mention asalient object, that object is treated as being in the common ground and is more likely to bementioned first. Study 2 (a visual search study) asks participants to listen to referring expressionsand find the specified target; in keeping with the above result, we find that search for easy-to-findtargets is faster when the target is mentioned first, while search for harder-to-find targets isfacilitated by mentioning the target later, after a landmark in a relational description. Our findingsshow that seemingly low-level and disparate mental modules like perception and sentenceplanning interact at a high level and in task-dependent ways.
topic visual search
information structure
audience design
referring expression generation
visual salience
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01793/full
work_keys_str_mv AT alasdairdanielfrancisclarke givinggooddirectionsorderofmentionreflectsvisualsalience
AT michaeelsner givinggooddirectionsorderofmentionreflectsvisualsalience
AT hannaherohde givinggooddirectionsorderofmentionreflectsvisualsalience
_version_ 1725361337598476288