Vertical accountabilitlity and democratization of Judiciary: the end of restricted suffrage
The National Council of Justice holds the Judiciary Branch horizontality accountable, however, other Judiciary institutions still lack vertical accountability that shall promote internal democratization. The transposition of Guilhermo O’Donnell’s concept of vertical accountability is useful to democ...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Portuguese |
Published: |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
2017-02-01
|
Series: | Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistapoliticiajudiciaria/article/view/1541 |
id |
doaj-149a2bb7f56f49a2a507dd1b018633c3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-149a2bb7f56f49a2a507dd1b018633c32020-11-24T21:36:04ZporConselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça2525-98222525-98222017-02-012210912810.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9822/2016.v2i2.15411514Vertical accountabilitlity and democratization of Judiciary: the end of restricted suffrageLourival Barão Marques Filho0Claudia Maria Barbosa1Mestrando em Direito Socioambiental e Sustentabilidade pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC/PR).Professora Titular de Direito Constitucional da Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná;The National Council of Justice holds the Judiciary Branch horizontality accountable, however, other Judiciary institutions still lack vertical accountability that shall promote internal democratization. The transposition of Guilhermo O’Donnell’s concept of vertical accountability is useful to democratize administration in Courts of Justice. The verticality in this perspective can be expressed by the possibility of judges to choose, watch, punish and reward their administrators. A new arrangement, based on efficient mechanisms of accountability, can provide a legitimacy that lacks for the internal public of these institutions, especially with direct election for the presidency of Courts of Justice.http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistapoliticiajudiciaria/article/view/1541Política JudiciáriaAdministração da JustiçaPoder judiciárioTribunaisAccountability horizontalEleições. |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Portuguese |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Lourival Barão Marques Filho Claudia Maria Barbosa |
spellingShingle |
Lourival Barão Marques Filho Claudia Maria Barbosa Vertical accountabilitlity and democratization of Judiciary: the end of restricted suffrage Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça Política Judiciária Administração da Justiça Poder judiciário Tribunais Accountability horizontal Eleições. |
author_facet |
Lourival Barão Marques Filho Claudia Maria Barbosa |
author_sort |
Lourival Barão Marques Filho |
title |
Vertical accountabilitlity and democratization of Judiciary: the end of restricted suffrage |
title_short |
Vertical accountabilitlity and democratization of Judiciary: the end of restricted suffrage |
title_full |
Vertical accountabilitlity and democratization of Judiciary: the end of restricted suffrage |
title_fullStr |
Vertical accountabilitlity and democratization of Judiciary: the end of restricted suffrage |
title_full_unstemmed |
Vertical accountabilitlity and democratization of Judiciary: the end of restricted suffrage |
title_sort |
vertical accountabilitlity and democratization of judiciary: the end of restricted suffrage |
publisher |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
series |
Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça |
issn |
2525-9822 2525-9822 |
publishDate |
2017-02-01 |
description |
The National Council of Justice holds the Judiciary Branch horizontality accountable, however, other Judiciary institutions still lack vertical accountability that shall promote internal democratization. The transposition of Guilhermo O’Donnell’s concept of vertical accountability is useful to democratize administration in Courts of Justice. The verticality in this perspective can be expressed by the possibility of judges to choose, watch, punish and reward their administrators. A new arrangement, based on efficient mechanisms of accountability, can provide a legitimacy that lacks for the internal public of these institutions, especially with direct election for the presidency of Courts of Justice. |
topic |
Política Judiciária Administração da Justiça Poder judiciário Tribunais Accountability horizontal Eleições. |
url |
http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistapoliticiajudiciaria/article/view/1541 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lourivalbaraomarquesfilho verticalaccountabilitlityanddemocratizationofjudiciarytheendofrestrictedsuffrage AT claudiamariabarbosa verticalaccountabilitlityanddemocratizationofjudiciarytheendofrestrictedsuffrage |
_version_ |
1725942389822980096 |