Vertical accountabilitlity and democratization of Judiciary: the end of restricted suffrage

The National Council of Justice holds the Judiciary Branch horizontality accountable, however, other Judiciary institutions still lack vertical accountability that shall promote internal democratization. The transposition of Guilhermo O’Donnell’s concept of vertical accountability is useful to democ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lourival Barão Marques Filho, Claudia Maria Barbosa
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) 2017-02-01
Series:Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistapoliticiajudiciaria/article/view/1541
id doaj-149a2bb7f56f49a2a507dd1b018633c3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-149a2bb7f56f49a2a507dd1b018633c32020-11-24T21:36:04ZporConselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça2525-98222525-98222017-02-012210912810.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9822/2016.v2i2.15411514Vertical accountabilitlity and democratization of Judiciary: the end of restricted suffrageLourival Barão Marques Filho0Claudia Maria Barbosa1Mestrando em Direito Socioambiental e Sustentabilidade pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC/PR).Professora Titular de Direito Constitucional da Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná;The National Council of Justice holds the Judiciary Branch horizontality accountable, however, other Judiciary institutions still lack vertical accountability that shall promote internal democratization. The transposition of Guilhermo O’Donnell’s concept of vertical accountability is useful to democratize administration in Courts of Justice. The verticality in this perspective can be expressed by the possibility of judges to choose, watch, punish and reward their administrators. A new arrangement, based on efficient mechanisms of accountability, can provide a legitimacy that lacks for the internal public of these institutions, especially with direct election for the presidency of Courts of Justice.http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistapoliticiajudiciaria/article/view/1541Política JudiciáriaAdministração da JustiçaPoder judiciárioTribunaisAccountability horizontalEleições.
collection DOAJ
language Portuguese
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lourival Barão Marques Filho
Claudia Maria Barbosa
spellingShingle Lourival Barão Marques Filho
Claudia Maria Barbosa
Vertical accountabilitlity and democratization of Judiciary: the end of restricted suffrage
Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça
Política Judiciária
Administração da Justiça
Poder judiciário
Tribunais
Accountability horizontal
Eleições.
author_facet Lourival Barão Marques Filho
Claudia Maria Barbosa
author_sort Lourival Barão Marques Filho
title Vertical accountabilitlity and democratization of Judiciary: the end of restricted suffrage
title_short Vertical accountabilitlity and democratization of Judiciary: the end of restricted suffrage
title_full Vertical accountabilitlity and democratization of Judiciary: the end of restricted suffrage
title_fullStr Vertical accountabilitlity and democratization of Judiciary: the end of restricted suffrage
title_full_unstemmed Vertical accountabilitlity and democratization of Judiciary: the end of restricted suffrage
title_sort vertical accountabilitlity and democratization of judiciary: the end of restricted suffrage
publisher Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
series Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça
issn 2525-9822
2525-9822
publishDate 2017-02-01
description The National Council of Justice holds the Judiciary Branch horizontality accountable, however, other Judiciary institutions still lack vertical accountability that shall promote internal democratization. The transposition of Guilhermo O’Donnell’s concept of vertical accountability is useful to democratize administration in Courts of Justice. The verticality in this perspective can be expressed by the possibility of judges to choose, watch, punish and reward their administrators. A new arrangement, based on efficient mechanisms of accountability, can provide a legitimacy that lacks for the internal public of these institutions, especially with direct election for the presidency of Courts of Justice.
topic Política Judiciária
Administração da Justiça
Poder judiciário
Tribunais
Accountability horizontal
Eleições.
url http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistapoliticiajudiciaria/article/view/1541
work_keys_str_mv AT lourivalbaraomarquesfilho verticalaccountabilitlityanddemocratizationofjudiciarytheendofrestrictedsuffrage
AT claudiamariabarbosa verticalaccountabilitlityanddemocratizationofjudiciarytheendofrestrictedsuffrage
_version_ 1725942389822980096