The influence of motion quality on responses towards video playback stimuli

Visual motion, a critical cue in communication, can be manipulated and studied using video playback methods. A primary concern for the video playback researcher is the degree to which objects presented on video appear natural to the non-human subject. Here we argue that the quality of motion cues on...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emma Ware, Daniel R. Saunders, Nikolaus F. Troje
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Company of Biologists 2015-07-01
Series:Biology Open
Subjects:
Online Access:http://bio.biologists.org/content/4/7/803
id doaj-14b3be1077454b128b801797da20c2df
record_format Article
spelling doaj-14b3be1077454b128b801797da20c2df2021-06-02T18:12:29ZengThe Company of BiologistsBiology Open2046-63902015-07-014780381110.1242/bio.011270011270The influence of motion quality on responses towards video playback stimuliEmma Ware0Daniel R. Saunders1Nikolaus F. Troje2 Department of Psychology, Queen's University, 99 University Ave, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada Department of Psychology, Queen's University, 99 University Ave, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada Department of Psychology, Queen's University, 99 University Ave, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada Visual motion, a critical cue in communication, can be manipulated and studied using video playback methods. A primary concern for the video playback researcher is the degree to which objects presented on video appear natural to the non-human subject. Here we argue that the quality of motion cues on video, as determined by the video's image presentation rate (IPR), are of particular importance in determining a subject's social response behaviour. We present an experiment testing the effect of variations in IPR on pigeon (Columbia livia) response behaviour towards video images of courting opposite sex partners. Male and female pigeons were presented with three video playback stimuli, each containing a different social partner. Each stimulus was then modified to appear at one of three IPRs: 15, 30 or 60 progressive (p) frames per second. The results showed that courtship behaviour became significantly longer in duration as IPR increased. This finding implies that the IPR significantly affects the perceived quality of motion cues impacting social behaviour. In males we found that the duration of courtship also depended on the social partner viewed and that this effect interacted with the effects of IPR on behaviour. Specifically, the effect of social partner reached statistical significance only when the stimuli were displayed at 60 p, demonstrating the potential for erroneous results when insufficient IPRs are used. In addition to demonstrating the importance of IPR in video playback experiments, these findings help to highlight and describe the role of visual motion processing in communication behaviour.http://bio.biologists.org/content/4/7/803Video playbackSocial perceptionBiological motion perceptionVisual communicationPresentation rate
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Emma Ware
Daniel R. Saunders
Nikolaus F. Troje
spellingShingle Emma Ware
Daniel R. Saunders
Nikolaus F. Troje
The influence of motion quality on responses towards video playback stimuli
Biology Open
Video playback
Social perception
Biological motion perception
Visual communication
Presentation rate
author_facet Emma Ware
Daniel R. Saunders
Nikolaus F. Troje
author_sort Emma Ware
title The influence of motion quality on responses towards video playback stimuli
title_short The influence of motion quality on responses towards video playback stimuli
title_full The influence of motion quality on responses towards video playback stimuli
title_fullStr The influence of motion quality on responses towards video playback stimuli
title_full_unstemmed The influence of motion quality on responses towards video playback stimuli
title_sort influence of motion quality on responses towards video playback stimuli
publisher The Company of Biologists
series Biology Open
issn 2046-6390
publishDate 2015-07-01
description Visual motion, a critical cue in communication, can be manipulated and studied using video playback methods. A primary concern for the video playback researcher is the degree to which objects presented on video appear natural to the non-human subject. Here we argue that the quality of motion cues on video, as determined by the video's image presentation rate (IPR), are of particular importance in determining a subject's social response behaviour. We present an experiment testing the effect of variations in IPR on pigeon (Columbia livia) response behaviour towards video images of courting opposite sex partners. Male and female pigeons were presented with three video playback stimuli, each containing a different social partner. Each stimulus was then modified to appear at one of three IPRs: 15, 30 or 60 progressive (p) frames per second. The results showed that courtship behaviour became significantly longer in duration as IPR increased. This finding implies that the IPR significantly affects the perceived quality of motion cues impacting social behaviour. In males we found that the duration of courtship also depended on the social partner viewed and that this effect interacted with the effects of IPR on behaviour. Specifically, the effect of social partner reached statistical significance only when the stimuli were displayed at 60 p, demonstrating the potential for erroneous results when insufficient IPRs are used. In addition to demonstrating the importance of IPR in video playback experiments, these findings help to highlight and describe the role of visual motion processing in communication behaviour.
topic Video playback
Social perception
Biological motion perception
Visual communication
Presentation rate
url http://bio.biologists.org/content/4/7/803
work_keys_str_mv AT emmaware theinfluenceofmotionqualityonresponsestowardsvideoplaybackstimuli
AT danielrsaunders theinfluenceofmotionqualityonresponsestowardsvideoplaybackstimuli
AT nikolausftroje theinfluenceofmotionqualityonresponsestowardsvideoplaybackstimuli
AT emmaware influenceofmotionqualityonresponsestowardsvideoplaybackstimuli
AT danielrsaunders influenceofmotionqualityonresponsestowardsvideoplaybackstimuli
AT nikolausftroje influenceofmotionqualityonresponsestowardsvideoplaybackstimuli
_version_ 1721402257738563584