Staphylococcus aureus in the community: colonization versus infection.

Antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections have increased dramatically in the community, yet S. aureus nasal colonization has remained stable. The objectives of this study were to determine if S. aureus colonization is a useful proxy measure to study disease transmission and infection in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maureen Miller, Heather A Cook, E Yoko Furuya, Meera Bhat, Mei-Ho Lee, Peter Vavagiakis, Paul Visintainer, Glenny Vasquez, Elaine Larson, Franklin D Lowy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2009-08-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2724739?pdf=render
id doaj-14be8067943e43f69a9e0aa164ed11fc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-14be8067943e43f69a9e0aa164ed11fc2020-11-25T01:52:38ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032009-08-0148e670810.1371/journal.pone.0006708Staphylococcus aureus in the community: colonization versus infection.Maureen MillerHeather A CookE Yoko FuruyaMeera BhatMei-Ho LeePeter VavagiakisPaul VisintainerGlenny VasquezElaine LarsonFranklin D LowyAntibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections have increased dramatically in the community, yet S. aureus nasal colonization has remained stable. The objectives of this study were to determine if S. aureus colonization is a useful proxy measure to study disease transmission and infection in community settings, and to identify potential community reservoirs.Randomly selected households in Northern Manhattan, completed a structured social network questionnaire and provided nasal swabs that were typed by pulsed field gel electrophoresis to identify S. aureus colonizing strains. The main outcome measures were: 1) colonization with S. aureus; and 2) recent serious skin infection. Risk factor analyses were conducted at both the individual and the household levels; logistic regression models identified independent risks for household colonization and infection.321 surveyed households contained 914 members. The S. aureus prevalence was 25% and MRSA was 0.4%. More than 40% of households were colonized. Recent antibiotic use was the only significant correlate for household colonization (p = .002). Seventy-eight (24%) households reported serious skin infection. In contrast with colonization, five of the six risk factors that increased the risk of skin infection in the household at the univariate level remained independently significant in multivariable analysis: international travel, sports participation, surgery, antibiotic use and towel sharing. S. aureus colonization was not significantly associated with serious skin infection in any analysis. Among multiperson households with more than one person colonized, 50% carried the same strain.The lack of association between S. aureus nasal colonization and serious skin infection underscores the need to explore alternative venues or body sites that may be crucial to transmission. Moreover, the magnitude of colonization and infection within the household suggests that households are an underappreciated and substantial community reservoir.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2724739?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maureen Miller
Heather A Cook
E Yoko Furuya
Meera Bhat
Mei-Ho Lee
Peter Vavagiakis
Paul Visintainer
Glenny Vasquez
Elaine Larson
Franklin D Lowy
spellingShingle Maureen Miller
Heather A Cook
E Yoko Furuya
Meera Bhat
Mei-Ho Lee
Peter Vavagiakis
Paul Visintainer
Glenny Vasquez
Elaine Larson
Franklin D Lowy
Staphylococcus aureus in the community: colonization versus infection.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Maureen Miller
Heather A Cook
E Yoko Furuya
Meera Bhat
Mei-Ho Lee
Peter Vavagiakis
Paul Visintainer
Glenny Vasquez
Elaine Larson
Franklin D Lowy
author_sort Maureen Miller
title Staphylococcus aureus in the community: colonization versus infection.
title_short Staphylococcus aureus in the community: colonization versus infection.
title_full Staphylococcus aureus in the community: colonization versus infection.
title_fullStr Staphylococcus aureus in the community: colonization versus infection.
title_full_unstemmed Staphylococcus aureus in the community: colonization versus infection.
title_sort staphylococcus aureus in the community: colonization versus infection.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2009-08-01
description Antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections have increased dramatically in the community, yet S. aureus nasal colonization has remained stable. The objectives of this study were to determine if S. aureus colonization is a useful proxy measure to study disease transmission and infection in community settings, and to identify potential community reservoirs.Randomly selected households in Northern Manhattan, completed a structured social network questionnaire and provided nasal swabs that were typed by pulsed field gel electrophoresis to identify S. aureus colonizing strains. The main outcome measures were: 1) colonization with S. aureus; and 2) recent serious skin infection. Risk factor analyses were conducted at both the individual and the household levels; logistic regression models identified independent risks for household colonization and infection.321 surveyed households contained 914 members. The S. aureus prevalence was 25% and MRSA was 0.4%. More than 40% of households were colonized. Recent antibiotic use was the only significant correlate for household colonization (p = .002). Seventy-eight (24%) households reported serious skin infection. In contrast with colonization, five of the six risk factors that increased the risk of skin infection in the household at the univariate level remained independently significant in multivariable analysis: international travel, sports participation, surgery, antibiotic use and towel sharing. S. aureus colonization was not significantly associated with serious skin infection in any analysis. Among multiperson households with more than one person colonized, 50% carried the same strain.The lack of association between S. aureus nasal colonization and serious skin infection underscores the need to explore alternative venues or body sites that may be crucial to transmission. Moreover, the magnitude of colonization and infection within the household suggests that households are an underappreciated and substantial community reservoir.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2724739?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT maureenmiller staphylococcusaureusinthecommunitycolonizationversusinfection
AT heatheracook staphylococcusaureusinthecommunitycolonizationversusinfection
AT eyokofuruya staphylococcusaureusinthecommunitycolonizationversusinfection
AT meerabhat staphylococcusaureusinthecommunitycolonizationversusinfection
AT meiholee staphylococcusaureusinthecommunitycolonizationversusinfection
AT petervavagiakis staphylococcusaureusinthecommunitycolonizationversusinfection
AT paulvisintainer staphylococcusaureusinthecommunitycolonizationversusinfection
AT glennyvasquez staphylococcusaureusinthecommunitycolonizationversusinfection
AT elainelarson staphylococcusaureusinthecommunitycolonizationversusinfection
AT franklindlowy staphylococcusaureusinthecommunitycolonizationversusinfection
_version_ 1724994029727252480