Stage-specific analysis of plasma protein profiles in ovarian cancer: Difference in-gel electrophoresis analysis of pooled clinical samples

Introduction: Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecological cancer. Non-specific symptoms early in disease and the lack of specific biomarkers hinder early diagnosis. Multi-marker blood screening tests have shown promise for improving identification of early stage disease; however,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mark J Bailey, Kristy L Shield-Artin, Karen Oliva, Mustafa Ayhan, Simone Reisman, Gregory E Rice
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2013-01-01
Series:Journal of Carcinogenesis
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.carcinogenesis.com/article.asp?issn=1477-3163;year=2013;volume=12;issue=1;spage=10;epage=10;aulast=Bailey
id doaj-14e0cc4e0fdc4842b32b3aa76ad14c26
record_format Article
spelling doaj-14e0cc4e0fdc4842b32b3aa76ad14c262020-11-24T22:44:23ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Carcinogenesis1477-31632013-01-01121101010.4103/1477-3163.114216Stage-specific analysis of plasma protein profiles in ovarian cancer: Difference in-gel electrophoresis analysis of pooled clinical samplesMark J BaileyKristy L Shield-ArtinKaren OlivaMustafa AyhanSimone ReismanGregory E RiceIntroduction: Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecological cancer. Non-specific symptoms early in disease and the lack of specific biomarkers hinder early diagnosis. Multi-marker blood screening tests have shown promise for improving identification of early stage disease; however, available tests lack sensitivity, and specificity. Materials and Methods: In this study, pooled deeply-depleted plasma from women with Stage 1, 2 or 3 ovarian cancer and healthy controls were used to compare the 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) protein profiles and identify potential novel markers of ovarian cancer progression. Results/Discussion: Stage-specific variation in biomarker expression was observed. For example, apolipoprotein A1 expression is relatively low in control and Stage 1, but shows a substantial increase in Stage 2 and 3, thus, potential of utility for disease confirmation rather than early detection. A better marker for early stage disease was tropomyosin 4 (TPM4). The expression of TPM4 increased by 2-fold in Stage 2 before returning to "normal" levels in Stage 3 disease. Multiple isoforms were also identified for some proteins and in some cases, displayed stage-specific expression. An interesting example was fibrinogen alpha, for which 8 isoforms were identified. Four displayed a moderate increase at Stage 1 and a substantial increase for Stages 2 and 3 while the other 4 showed only moderate increases. Conclusion: Herein is provided an improved summary of blood protein profiles for women with ovarian cancer stratified by stage.http://www.carcinogenesis.com/article.asp?issn=1477-3163;year=2013;volume=12;issue=1;spage=10;epage=10;aulast=BaileyDifference in-gel electrophoresisdisease stageprotein depletionovarian cancer
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mark J Bailey
Kristy L Shield-Artin
Karen Oliva
Mustafa Ayhan
Simone Reisman
Gregory E Rice
spellingShingle Mark J Bailey
Kristy L Shield-Artin
Karen Oliva
Mustafa Ayhan
Simone Reisman
Gregory E Rice
Stage-specific analysis of plasma protein profiles in ovarian cancer: Difference in-gel electrophoresis analysis of pooled clinical samples
Journal of Carcinogenesis
Difference in-gel electrophoresis
disease stage
protein depletion
ovarian cancer
author_facet Mark J Bailey
Kristy L Shield-Artin
Karen Oliva
Mustafa Ayhan
Simone Reisman
Gregory E Rice
author_sort Mark J Bailey
title Stage-specific analysis of plasma protein profiles in ovarian cancer: Difference in-gel electrophoresis analysis of pooled clinical samples
title_short Stage-specific analysis of plasma protein profiles in ovarian cancer: Difference in-gel electrophoresis analysis of pooled clinical samples
title_full Stage-specific analysis of plasma protein profiles in ovarian cancer: Difference in-gel electrophoresis analysis of pooled clinical samples
title_fullStr Stage-specific analysis of plasma protein profiles in ovarian cancer: Difference in-gel electrophoresis analysis of pooled clinical samples
title_full_unstemmed Stage-specific analysis of plasma protein profiles in ovarian cancer: Difference in-gel electrophoresis analysis of pooled clinical samples
title_sort stage-specific analysis of plasma protein profiles in ovarian cancer: difference in-gel electrophoresis analysis of pooled clinical samples
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Carcinogenesis
issn 1477-3163
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Introduction: Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecological cancer. Non-specific symptoms early in disease and the lack of specific biomarkers hinder early diagnosis. Multi-marker blood screening tests have shown promise for improving identification of early stage disease; however, available tests lack sensitivity, and specificity. Materials and Methods: In this study, pooled deeply-depleted plasma from women with Stage 1, 2 or 3 ovarian cancer and healthy controls were used to compare the 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) protein profiles and identify potential novel markers of ovarian cancer progression. Results/Discussion: Stage-specific variation in biomarker expression was observed. For example, apolipoprotein A1 expression is relatively low in control and Stage 1, but shows a substantial increase in Stage 2 and 3, thus, potential of utility for disease confirmation rather than early detection. A better marker for early stage disease was tropomyosin 4 (TPM4). The expression of TPM4 increased by 2-fold in Stage 2 before returning to "normal" levels in Stage 3 disease. Multiple isoforms were also identified for some proteins and in some cases, displayed stage-specific expression. An interesting example was fibrinogen alpha, for which 8 isoforms were identified. Four displayed a moderate increase at Stage 1 and a substantial increase for Stages 2 and 3 while the other 4 showed only moderate increases. Conclusion: Herein is provided an improved summary of blood protein profiles for women with ovarian cancer stratified by stage.
topic Difference in-gel electrophoresis
disease stage
protein depletion
ovarian cancer
url http://www.carcinogenesis.com/article.asp?issn=1477-3163;year=2013;volume=12;issue=1;spage=10;epage=10;aulast=Bailey
work_keys_str_mv AT markjbailey stagespecificanalysisofplasmaproteinprofilesinovariancancerdifferenceingelelectrophoresisanalysisofpooledclinicalsamples
AT kristylshieldartin stagespecificanalysisofplasmaproteinprofilesinovariancancerdifferenceingelelectrophoresisanalysisofpooledclinicalsamples
AT karenoliva stagespecificanalysisofplasmaproteinprofilesinovariancancerdifferenceingelelectrophoresisanalysisofpooledclinicalsamples
AT mustafaayhan stagespecificanalysisofplasmaproteinprofilesinovariancancerdifferenceingelelectrophoresisanalysisofpooledclinicalsamples
AT simonereisman stagespecificanalysisofplasmaproteinprofilesinovariancancerdifferenceingelelectrophoresisanalysisofpooledclinicalsamples
AT gregoryerice stagespecificanalysisofplasmaproteinprofilesinovariancancerdifferenceingelelectrophoresisanalysisofpooledclinicalsamples
_version_ 1725692004742987776