A scoping review on the surgical management of metastatic bone disease of the extremities

Abstract Background Management of metastatic bone disease of the extremities (MBD-E) is challenging, and surgical directions pose significant implications for overall patient morbidity and mortality. Recent literature reviews on the surgical management of MBD-E present a paucity of high-level eviden...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joseph K. Kendal, Annalise Abbott, Sahil Kooner, Herman Johal, Shannon K. T. Puloski, Michael J. Monument
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-08-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-018-2210-8
id doaj-14e213e40ab9471898708e4af4885086
record_format Article
spelling doaj-14e213e40ab9471898708e4af48850862020-11-25T02:03:37ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742018-08-0119111010.1186/s12891-018-2210-8A scoping review on the surgical management of metastatic bone disease of the extremitiesJoseph K. Kendal0Annalise Abbott1Sahil Kooner2Herman Johal3Shannon K. T. Puloski4Michael J. Monument5Section of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of CalgarySection of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of CalgarySection of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of CalgaryCentre for Evidence Based Orthopaedics, Departments of Surgery, McMaster UniversitySection of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of CalgarySection of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of CalgaryAbstract Background Management of metastatic bone disease of the extremities (MBD-E) is challenging, and surgical directions pose significant implications for overall patient morbidity and mortality. Recent literature reviews on the surgical management of MBD-E present a paucity of high-level evidence and global inconsistencies in study design. In order to steer productive research, a scoping review was performed to map and assess critical knowledge gaps. Methods The Arksey and O’Malley framework for scoping studies was followed. A comprehensive literature search identified a large body of literature pertaining to the surgical management of MBD-E. Study data and meta-data was extracted and presented using descriptive analytics and a thematic framework. Literature gaps were identified and analyzed. Results Three hundred eighty five studies from 1969 to 2017 were included. Studies were categorized into 11 separate themes, with the majority (63%) falling into the “surgical fixation strategies” theme, followed by “complications” at 7% and “prognosis and survival” at 6.2%. Less than 3% of studies were categorized in “patient related outcomes” or “epidemiology” themes. 89% of studies were retrospective and only 6 studies were of level 1 or 2 evidence. We identified a temporal increase in publication by decade, and all studies published on interventional radiology techniques or economic analyses were published after 2007 or 2009, respectively. 64.9% of studies were published in Europe and 20.3% were published in North America. Average patient age was 62 (± 5.2 years), and breast was the most common primary tumour (28%), followed by lung (17%) and kidney (15%). In terms of surgical location, 75% of operations involved the femur, followed by the humerus at 22% and tibia at 3%. Conclusions We present a descriptive overview of the current published literature on the surgical management of MBD-E. Critical knowledge gaps have been identified through the development of a thematic framework. Consolidation of literary gaps must involve bolstered efforts towards patient and family-engaged research initiatives and assessment of patient-related surgical outcomes. Multi-disciplinary engagement in developing prospective research will also help guide evidence-based personalized practice for these patients. By building on existing comprehensive patient databases and registries, knowledge on survival and prognostic parameters can be greatly improved.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-018-2210-8Metastatic bone diseaseOrthopedic surgeryPathologic fractureScoping reviewPatient-engaged research
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Joseph K. Kendal
Annalise Abbott
Sahil Kooner
Herman Johal
Shannon K. T. Puloski
Michael J. Monument
spellingShingle Joseph K. Kendal
Annalise Abbott
Sahil Kooner
Herman Johal
Shannon K. T. Puloski
Michael J. Monument
A scoping review on the surgical management of metastatic bone disease of the extremities
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Metastatic bone disease
Orthopedic surgery
Pathologic fracture
Scoping review
Patient-engaged research
author_facet Joseph K. Kendal
Annalise Abbott
Sahil Kooner
Herman Johal
Shannon K. T. Puloski
Michael J. Monument
author_sort Joseph K. Kendal
title A scoping review on the surgical management of metastatic bone disease of the extremities
title_short A scoping review on the surgical management of metastatic bone disease of the extremities
title_full A scoping review on the surgical management of metastatic bone disease of the extremities
title_fullStr A scoping review on the surgical management of metastatic bone disease of the extremities
title_full_unstemmed A scoping review on the surgical management of metastatic bone disease of the extremities
title_sort scoping review on the surgical management of metastatic bone disease of the extremities
publisher BMC
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
issn 1471-2474
publishDate 2018-08-01
description Abstract Background Management of metastatic bone disease of the extremities (MBD-E) is challenging, and surgical directions pose significant implications for overall patient morbidity and mortality. Recent literature reviews on the surgical management of MBD-E present a paucity of high-level evidence and global inconsistencies in study design. In order to steer productive research, a scoping review was performed to map and assess critical knowledge gaps. Methods The Arksey and O’Malley framework for scoping studies was followed. A comprehensive literature search identified a large body of literature pertaining to the surgical management of MBD-E. Study data and meta-data was extracted and presented using descriptive analytics and a thematic framework. Literature gaps were identified and analyzed. Results Three hundred eighty five studies from 1969 to 2017 were included. Studies were categorized into 11 separate themes, with the majority (63%) falling into the “surgical fixation strategies” theme, followed by “complications” at 7% and “prognosis and survival” at 6.2%. Less than 3% of studies were categorized in “patient related outcomes” or “epidemiology” themes. 89% of studies were retrospective and only 6 studies were of level 1 or 2 evidence. We identified a temporal increase in publication by decade, and all studies published on interventional radiology techniques or economic analyses were published after 2007 or 2009, respectively. 64.9% of studies were published in Europe and 20.3% were published in North America. Average patient age was 62 (± 5.2 years), and breast was the most common primary tumour (28%), followed by lung (17%) and kidney (15%). In terms of surgical location, 75% of operations involved the femur, followed by the humerus at 22% and tibia at 3%. Conclusions We present a descriptive overview of the current published literature on the surgical management of MBD-E. Critical knowledge gaps have been identified through the development of a thematic framework. Consolidation of literary gaps must involve bolstered efforts towards patient and family-engaged research initiatives and assessment of patient-related surgical outcomes. Multi-disciplinary engagement in developing prospective research will also help guide evidence-based personalized practice for these patients. By building on existing comprehensive patient databases and registries, knowledge on survival and prognostic parameters can be greatly improved.
topic Metastatic bone disease
Orthopedic surgery
Pathologic fracture
Scoping review
Patient-engaged research
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-018-2210-8
work_keys_str_mv AT josephkkendal ascopingreviewonthesurgicalmanagementofmetastaticbonediseaseoftheextremities
AT annaliseabbott ascopingreviewonthesurgicalmanagementofmetastaticbonediseaseoftheextremities
AT sahilkooner ascopingreviewonthesurgicalmanagementofmetastaticbonediseaseoftheextremities
AT hermanjohal ascopingreviewonthesurgicalmanagementofmetastaticbonediseaseoftheextremities
AT shannonktpuloski ascopingreviewonthesurgicalmanagementofmetastaticbonediseaseoftheextremities
AT michaeljmonument ascopingreviewonthesurgicalmanagementofmetastaticbonediseaseoftheextremities
AT josephkkendal scopingreviewonthesurgicalmanagementofmetastaticbonediseaseoftheextremities
AT annaliseabbott scopingreviewonthesurgicalmanagementofmetastaticbonediseaseoftheextremities
AT sahilkooner scopingreviewonthesurgicalmanagementofmetastaticbonediseaseoftheextremities
AT hermanjohal scopingreviewonthesurgicalmanagementofmetastaticbonediseaseoftheextremities
AT shannonktpuloski scopingreviewonthesurgicalmanagementofmetastaticbonediseaseoftheextremities
AT michaeljmonument scopingreviewonthesurgicalmanagementofmetastaticbonediseaseoftheextremities
_version_ 1724946916990517248