Safety and efficacy of fiducial marker implantation for robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy with fiducial tracking

Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility, efficacy and toxicity of fiducial marker implantation and tracking in CyberKnife® stereotactic radiation therapy (SBRT) applied to extracranial locations. Materials and method This is a retrospective, single-centre, observatio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nathaniel Scher, Marc Bollet, Gauthier Bouilhol, Remi Tannouri, Imane Khemiri, Aurelie Vouillaume, Noura Sellami, Rie Von Eyben, Jean-Michel Vannetzel, Ilan Darmon, Luc Rotenberg, Hanah Lamallem, Olivier Bauduceau, Denis Foster, Alain Toledano
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-09-01
Series:Radiation Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13014-019-1373-2
id doaj-1501ebcf18a54dda8921a491ebfa56db
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1501ebcf18a54dda8921a491ebfa56db2020-11-25T03:31:03ZengBMCRadiation Oncology1748-717X2019-09-011411810.1186/s13014-019-1373-2Safety and efficacy of fiducial marker implantation for robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy with fiducial trackingNathaniel Scher0Marc Bollet1Gauthier Bouilhol2Remi Tannouri3Imane Khemiri4Aurelie Vouillaume5Noura Sellami6Rie Von Eyben7Jean-Michel Vannetzel8Ilan Darmon9Luc Rotenberg10Hanah Lamallem11Olivier Bauduceau12Denis Foster13Alain Toledano14Hartmann Radiotherapy InstituteHartmann Radiotherapy InstituteHartmann Radiotherapy InstituteHartmann Radiotherapy InstituteHartmann Radiotherapy InstituteHartmann Radiotherapy InstituteHartmann Radiotherapy InstituteDepartment of Statistical Analysis, Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of MedicineHartmann Radiotherapy InstituteHartmann Radiotherapy InstituteHartmann Radiotherapy InstituteHartmann Radiotherapy InstituteHartmann Radiotherapy InstituteHartmann Radiotherapy InstituteHartmann Radiotherapy InstituteAbstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility, efficacy and toxicity of fiducial marker implantation and tracking in CyberKnife® stereotactic radiation therapy (SBRT) applied to extracranial locations. Materials and method This is a retrospective, single-centre, observational study to collect the data of all patients treated by stereotactic radiation therapy with fiducial marker tracking at extracranial locations, conducted between June 2014 and November 2017. Information regarding the implantation procedure, the types of toxicity related to marker implantation and the number of markers implanted/tracked during treatment were collected. Complication rates were evaluated using the CTCAE v4 [Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events] scale. The technical success rate was based on the ability to optimally track the tumor throughout all treatment fractions. Results Out of 2505 patients treated by stereotactic radiation therapy, 25% received treatment with fiducial marker tracking. The total number of implantation procedures was 616 and 1543 fiducial markers were implanted. The implantation-related complication rate was 3%, with 16 Grade 1 events and 4 Grade 2 events. The number of treated patients and the number of implanted markers has gradually increased since the technique was first implemented. The median treatment time was 27 min (range 10–76). 1295 fiducials were effectively tracked throughout all treatment fractions, corresponding to a technical success rate of 84%. The difference between the number of fiducials implanted and those tracked during treatment decreased significantly as the site’s experience increased. Conclusion Fiducial marker implantation and tracking is feasible, well-tolerated, and technically effective technique in SBRT for extracranial tumors.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13014-019-1373-2Stereotactic body radiation therapyImage guided radiation therapyFiducial marker
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nathaniel Scher
Marc Bollet
Gauthier Bouilhol
Remi Tannouri
Imane Khemiri
Aurelie Vouillaume
Noura Sellami
Rie Von Eyben
Jean-Michel Vannetzel
Ilan Darmon
Luc Rotenberg
Hanah Lamallem
Olivier Bauduceau
Denis Foster
Alain Toledano
spellingShingle Nathaniel Scher
Marc Bollet
Gauthier Bouilhol
Remi Tannouri
Imane Khemiri
Aurelie Vouillaume
Noura Sellami
Rie Von Eyben
Jean-Michel Vannetzel
Ilan Darmon
Luc Rotenberg
Hanah Lamallem
Olivier Bauduceau
Denis Foster
Alain Toledano
Safety and efficacy of fiducial marker implantation for robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy with fiducial tracking
Radiation Oncology
Stereotactic body radiation therapy
Image guided radiation therapy
Fiducial marker
author_facet Nathaniel Scher
Marc Bollet
Gauthier Bouilhol
Remi Tannouri
Imane Khemiri
Aurelie Vouillaume
Noura Sellami
Rie Von Eyben
Jean-Michel Vannetzel
Ilan Darmon
Luc Rotenberg
Hanah Lamallem
Olivier Bauduceau
Denis Foster
Alain Toledano
author_sort Nathaniel Scher
title Safety and efficacy of fiducial marker implantation for robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy with fiducial tracking
title_short Safety and efficacy of fiducial marker implantation for robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy with fiducial tracking
title_full Safety and efficacy of fiducial marker implantation for robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy with fiducial tracking
title_fullStr Safety and efficacy of fiducial marker implantation for robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy with fiducial tracking
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficacy of fiducial marker implantation for robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy with fiducial tracking
title_sort safety and efficacy of fiducial marker implantation for robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy with fiducial tracking
publisher BMC
series Radiation Oncology
issn 1748-717X
publishDate 2019-09-01
description Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility, efficacy and toxicity of fiducial marker implantation and tracking in CyberKnife® stereotactic radiation therapy (SBRT) applied to extracranial locations. Materials and method This is a retrospective, single-centre, observational study to collect the data of all patients treated by stereotactic radiation therapy with fiducial marker tracking at extracranial locations, conducted between June 2014 and November 2017. Information regarding the implantation procedure, the types of toxicity related to marker implantation and the number of markers implanted/tracked during treatment were collected. Complication rates were evaluated using the CTCAE v4 [Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events] scale. The technical success rate was based on the ability to optimally track the tumor throughout all treatment fractions. Results Out of 2505 patients treated by stereotactic radiation therapy, 25% received treatment with fiducial marker tracking. The total number of implantation procedures was 616 and 1543 fiducial markers were implanted. The implantation-related complication rate was 3%, with 16 Grade 1 events and 4 Grade 2 events. The number of treated patients and the number of implanted markers has gradually increased since the technique was first implemented. The median treatment time was 27 min (range 10–76). 1295 fiducials were effectively tracked throughout all treatment fractions, corresponding to a technical success rate of 84%. The difference between the number of fiducials implanted and those tracked during treatment decreased significantly as the site’s experience increased. Conclusion Fiducial marker implantation and tracking is feasible, well-tolerated, and technically effective technique in SBRT for extracranial tumors.
topic Stereotactic body radiation therapy
Image guided radiation therapy
Fiducial marker
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13014-019-1373-2
work_keys_str_mv AT nathanielscher safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking
AT marcbollet safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking
AT gauthierbouilhol safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking
AT remitannouri safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking
AT imanekhemiri safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking
AT aurelievouillaume safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking
AT nourasellami safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking
AT rievoneyben safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking
AT jeanmichelvannetzel safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking
AT ilandarmon safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking
AT lucrotenberg safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking
AT hanahlamallem safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking
AT olivierbauduceau safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking
AT denisfoster safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking
AT alaintoledano safetyandefficacyoffiducialmarkerimplantationforroboticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapywithfiducialtracking
_version_ 1724573954888171520