The influence of bubbles on the perception carbonation bite.

Although many people naively assume that the bite of carbonation is due to tactile stimulation of the oral cavity by bubbles, it has become increasingly clear that carbonation bite comes mainly from formation of carbonic acid in the oral mucosa. In Experiment 1, we asked whether bubbles were in fact...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paul M Wise, Madeline Wolf, Stephen R Thom, Bruce Bryant
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3749224?pdf=render
id doaj-1504b4539f634024960bebee8160080f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1504b4539f634024960bebee8160080f2020-11-24T22:00:28ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0188e7148810.1371/journal.pone.0071488The influence of bubbles on the perception carbonation bite.Paul M WiseMadeline WolfStephen R ThomBruce BryantAlthough many people naively assume that the bite of carbonation is due to tactile stimulation of the oral cavity by bubbles, it has become increasingly clear that carbonation bite comes mainly from formation of carbonic acid in the oral mucosa. In Experiment 1, we asked whether bubbles were in fact required to perceive carbonation bite. Subjects rated oral pungency from several concentrations of carbonated water both at normal atmospheric pressure (at which bubbles could form) and at 2.0 atmospheres pressure (at which bubbles did not form). Ratings of carbonation bite under the two pressure conditions were essentially identical, indicating that bubbles are not required for pungency. In Experiment 2, we created controlled streams of air bubbles around the tongue in mildly pungent CO2 solutions to determine how tactile stimulation from bubbles affects carbonation bite. Since innocuous sensations like light touch and cooling often suppress pain, we predicted that bubbles might reduce rated bite. Contrary to prediction, air bubbles flowing around the tongue significantly enhanced rated bite, without inducing perceived bite in blank (un-carbonated) solutions. Accordingly, though bubbles are clearly not required for carbonation bite, they may well modulate perceived bite. More generally, the results show that innocuous tactile stimulation can enhance chemogenic pain. Possible physiological mechanisms are discussed.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3749224?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paul M Wise
Madeline Wolf
Stephen R Thom
Bruce Bryant
spellingShingle Paul M Wise
Madeline Wolf
Stephen R Thom
Bruce Bryant
The influence of bubbles on the perception carbonation bite.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Paul M Wise
Madeline Wolf
Stephen R Thom
Bruce Bryant
author_sort Paul M Wise
title The influence of bubbles on the perception carbonation bite.
title_short The influence of bubbles on the perception carbonation bite.
title_full The influence of bubbles on the perception carbonation bite.
title_fullStr The influence of bubbles on the perception carbonation bite.
title_full_unstemmed The influence of bubbles on the perception carbonation bite.
title_sort influence of bubbles on the perception carbonation bite.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Although many people naively assume that the bite of carbonation is due to tactile stimulation of the oral cavity by bubbles, it has become increasingly clear that carbonation bite comes mainly from formation of carbonic acid in the oral mucosa. In Experiment 1, we asked whether bubbles were in fact required to perceive carbonation bite. Subjects rated oral pungency from several concentrations of carbonated water both at normal atmospheric pressure (at which bubbles could form) and at 2.0 atmospheres pressure (at which bubbles did not form). Ratings of carbonation bite under the two pressure conditions were essentially identical, indicating that bubbles are not required for pungency. In Experiment 2, we created controlled streams of air bubbles around the tongue in mildly pungent CO2 solutions to determine how tactile stimulation from bubbles affects carbonation bite. Since innocuous sensations like light touch and cooling often suppress pain, we predicted that bubbles might reduce rated bite. Contrary to prediction, air bubbles flowing around the tongue significantly enhanced rated bite, without inducing perceived bite in blank (un-carbonated) solutions. Accordingly, though bubbles are clearly not required for carbonation bite, they may well modulate perceived bite. More generally, the results show that innocuous tactile stimulation can enhance chemogenic pain. Possible physiological mechanisms are discussed.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3749224?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT paulmwise theinfluenceofbubblesontheperceptioncarbonationbite
AT madelinewolf theinfluenceofbubblesontheperceptioncarbonationbite
AT stephenrthom theinfluenceofbubblesontheperceptioncarbonationbite
AT brucebryant theinfluenceofbubblesontheperceptioncarbonationbite
AT paulmwise influenceofbubblesontheperceptioncarbonationbite
AT madelinewolf influenceofbubblesontheperceptioncarbonationbite
AT stephenrthom influenceofbubblesontheperceptioncarbonationbite
AT brucebryant influenceofbubblesontheperceptioncarbonationbite
_version_ 1725844312676106240