The effect of using light emitting diodes and fluorescent lamps as different light sources in growth inhibition tests of green alga, diatom, and cyanobacteria.

Aquatic organisms have been used to investigate the safety of chemicals worldwide. One such assessment is an algal growth inhibition test. Algal growth inhibition tests are commonly performed using a growth chamber with fluorescent lamps as the lighting source, as test guidelines require continuous...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Akira Okamoto, Miyuki Imamura, Kazune Tani, Takeru Matsumoto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247426
id doaj-15254894e6014155a634b58885b7ff94
record_format Article
spelling doaj-15254894e6014155a634b58885b7ff942021-08-17T04:31:38ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01162e024742610.1371/journal.pone.0247426The effect of using light emitting diodes and fluorescent lamps as different light sources in growth inhibition tests of green alga, diatom, and cyanobacteria.Akira OkamotoMiyuki ImamuraKazune TaniTakeru MatsumotoAquatic organisms have been used to investigate the safety of chemicals worldwide. One such assessment is an algal growth inhibition test. Algal growth inhibition tests are commonly performed using a growth chamber with fluorescent lamps as the lighting source, as test guidelines require continuous uniform fluorescent illumination. However, fluorescent lamps contain mercury, which has been identified as hazardous to humans and other organisms. The Minamata Convention (adopted in 2013) requires reduction or prohibition of products containing mercury. On the other hand, light-emitting diodes do not contain mercury and provide a photosynthetically effective wavelength range of 400-700 nm which is an adequate light intensity for algal growth. Light-emitting diodes are thus preferable to fluorescent lamps as a potential light source in algal growth inhibition tests. In this study, we investigated if light-emitting diodes could be substituted for fluorescent lamps in growth inhibition studies with green alga (Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata), diatom (Navicula pelliculosa), and cyanobacteria (Anabaena flos-aquae). Algal growth inhibition tests were performed using five different chemicals known to have different modes of action and are assigned as reference substances in the test guidelines. The results of each algal test showed similar values between light-emitting diodes and fluorescent lamps in terms of conditions for the growth inhibition rate and percent inhibition in yield of each chemical. It was therefore concluded that using light-emitting diodes instead of fluorescent lamps as a lighting source had no effect on the algal growth inhibition test results.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247426
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Akira Okamoto
Miyuki Imamura
Kazune Tani
Takeru Matsumoto
spellingShingle Akira Okamoto
Miyuki Imamura
Kazune Tani
Takeru Matsumoto
The effect of using light emitting diodes and fluorescent lamps as different light sources in growth inhibition tests of green alga, diatom, and cyanobacteria.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Akira Okamoto
Miyuki Imamura
Kazune Tani
Takeru Matsumoto
author_sort Akira Okamoto
title The effect of using light emitting diodes and fluorescent lamps as different light sources in growth inhibition tests of green alga, diatom, and cyanobacteria.
title_short The effect of using light emitting diodes and fluorescent lamps as different light sources in growth inhibition tests of green alga, diatom, and cyanobacteria.
title_full The effect of using light emitting diodes and fluorescent lamps as different light sources in growth inhibition tests of green alga, diatom, and cyanobacteria.
title_fullStr The effect of using light emitting diodes and fluorescent lamps as different light sources in growth inhibition tests of green alga, diatom, and cyanobacteria.
title_full_unstemmed The effect of using light emitting diodes and fluorescent lamps as different light sources in growth inhibition tests of green alga, diatom, and cyanobacteria.
title_sort effect of using light emitting diodes and fluorescent lamps as different light sources in growth inhibition tests of green alga, diatom, and cyanobacteria.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Aquatic organisms have been used to investigate the safety of chemicals worldwide. One such assessment is an algal growth inhibition test. Algal growth inhibition tests are commonly performed using a growth chamber with fluorescent lamps as the lighting source, as test guidelines require continuous uniform fluorescent illumination. However, fluorescent lamps contain mercury, which has been identified as hazardous to humans and other organisms. The Minamata Convention (adopted in 2013) requires reduction or prohibition of products containing mercury. On the other hand, light-emitting diodes do not contain mercury and provide a photosynthetically effective wavelength range of 400-700 nm which is an adequate light intensity for algal growth. Light-emitting diodes are thus preferable to fluorescent lamps as a potential light source in algal growth inhibition tests. In this study, we investigated if light-emitting diodes could be substituted for fluorescent lamps in growth inhibition studies with green alga (Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata), diatom (Navicula pelliculosa), and cyanobacteria (Anabaena flos-aquae). Algal growth inhibition tests were performed using five different chemicals known to have different modes of action and are assigned as reference substances in the test guidelines. The results of each algal test showed similar values between light-emitting diodes and fluorescent lamps in terms of conditions for the growth inhibition rate and percent inhibition in yield of each chemical. It was therefore concluded that using light-emitting diodes instead of fluorescent lamps as a lighting source had no effect on the algal growth inhibition test results.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247426
work_keys_str_mv AT akiraokamoto theeffectofusinglightemittingdiodesandfluorescentlampsasdifferentlightsourcesingrowthinhibitiontestsofgreenalgadiatomandcyanobacteria
AT miyukiimamura theeffectofusinglightemittingdiodesandfluorescentlampsasdifferentlightsourcesingrowthinhibitiontestsofgreenalgadiatomandcyanobacteria
AT kazunetani theeffectofusinglightemittingdiodesandfluorescentlampsasdifferentlightsourcesingrowthinhibitiontestsofgreenalgadiatomandcyanobacteria
AT takerumatsumoto theeffectofusinglightemittingdiodesandfluorescentlampsasdifferentlightsourcesingrowthinhibitiontestsofgreenalgadiatomandcyanobacteria
AT akiraokamoto effectofusinglightemittingdiodesandfluorescentlampsasdifferentlightsourcesingrowthinhibitiontestsofgreenalgadiatomandcyanobacteria
AT miyukiimamura effectofusinglightemittingdiodesandfluorescentlampsasdifferentlightsourcesingrowthinhibitiontestsofgreenalgadiatomandcyanobacteria
AT kazunetani effectofusinglightemittingdiodesandfluorescentlampsasdifferentlightsourcesingrowthinhibitiontestsofgreenalgadiatomandcyanobacteria
AT takerumatsumoto effectofusinglightemittingdiodesandfluorescentlampsasdifferentlightsourcesingrowthinhibitiontestsofgreenalgadiatomandcyanobacteria
_version_ 1721205400524554240