Protecting important sites for biodiversity contributes to meeting global conservation targets.

• Main Authors: Stuart H M Butchart, Jörn P W Scharlemann, Mike I Evans, Suhel Quader, Salvatore Aricò, Julius Arinaitwe, Mark Balman, Leon A Bennun, Bastian Bertzky, Charles Besançon, Timothy M Boucher, Thomas M Brooks, Ian J Burfield, Neil D Burgess, Simba Chan, Rob P Clay, Mike J Crosby, Nicholas C Davidson, Naamal De Silva, Christian Devenish, Guy C L Dutson, David F Día Z Fernández, Lincoln D C Fishpool, Claire Fitzgerald, Matt Foster, Melanie F Heath, Marc Hockings, Michael Hoffmann, David Knox, Frank W Larsen, John F Lamoreux, Colby Loucks, Ian May, James Millett, Dominic Molloy, Paul Morling, Mike Parr, Taylor H Ricketts, Nathalie Seddon, Benjamin Skolnik, Simon N Stuart, Amy Upgren, Stephen Woodley
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
• Series: PLoS ONE
• Online Access: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22457717/?tool=EBI

Protected areas (PAs) are a cornerstone of conservation efforts and now cover nearly 13% of the world's land surface, with the world's governments committed to expand this to 17%. However, as biodiversity continues to decline, the effectiveness of PAs in reducing the extinction risk of species remains largely untested. We analyzed PA coverage and trends in species' extinction risk at globally significant sites for conserving birds (10,993 Important Bird Areas, IBAs) and highly threatened vertebrates and conifers (588 Alliance for Zero Extinction sites, AZEs) (referred to collectively hereafter as 'important sites'). Species occurring in important sites with greater PA coverage experienced smaller increases in extinction risk over recent decades: the increase was half as large for bird species with>50% of the IBAs at which they occur completely covered by PAs, and a third lower for birds, mammals and amphibians restricted to protected AZEs (compared with unprotected or partially protected sites). Globally, half of the important sites for biodiversity conservation remain unprotected (49% of IBAs, 51% of AZEs). While PA coverage of important sites has increased over time, the proportion of PA area covering important sites, as opposed to less important land, has declined (by 0.45-1.14% annually since 1950 for IBAs and 0.79-1.49% annually for AZEs). Thus, while appropriately located PAs may slow the rate at which species are driven towards extinction, recent PA network expansion has under-represented important sites. We conclude that better targeted expansion of PA networks would help to improve biodiversity trends.