Uncertainty Quantification in Fatigue Crack Growth Prognosis

This paper presents a methodology to quantify the uncertainty in fatigue crack growth prognosis, applied to structures with complicated geometry and subjected to variable amplitude multi-axial loading. Finite element analysis is used to address the complicated geometry and calculate the stress inten...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shankar Sankararaman, You Ling, Christopher Shantz, Sankaran Mahadevan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Prognostics and Health Management Society 2011-01-01
Series:International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.phmsociety.org/sites/all/modules/pubdlcnt/pubdlcnt.php?file=http://www.phmsociety.org/sites/phmsociety.org/files/phm_submission/2010/ijPHM_11_001.pdf&nid=287
id doaj-1531083ab13c4f9f9a60097bb68a631f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1531083ab13c4f9f9a60097bb68a631f2021-07-02T02:33:40ZengThe Prognostics and Health Management SocietyInternational Journal of Prognostics and Health Management2153-26482011-01-0121115Uncertainty Quantification in Fatigue Crack Growth PrognosisShankar SankararamanYou LingChristopher ShantzSankaran MahadevanThis paper presents a methodology to quantify the uncertainty in fatigue crack growth prognosis, applied to structures with complicated geometry and subjected to variable amplitude multi-axial loading. Finite element analysis is used to address the complicated geometry and calculate the stress intensity factors. Multi-modal stress intensity factors due to multi-axial loading are combined to calculate an equivalent stress intensity factor using a characteristic plane approach. Crack growth under variable amplitude loading is modeled using a modified Paris law that includes retardation effects. During cycle-by-cycle integration of the crack growth law, a Gaussian process surrogate model is used to replace the expensive finite element analysis. The effect of different types of uncertainty – physical variability, data uncertainty and modeling errors – on crack growth prediction is investigated. The various sources of uncertainty include, but not limited to, variability in loading conditions, material parameters, experimental data, model uncertainty, etc. Three different types of modeling errors – crack growth model error, discretization error and surrogate model error – are included in analysis. The different types of uncertainty are incorporated into the crack growth prediction methodology to predict the probability distribution of crack size as a function of number of load cycles. The proposed method is illustrated using an application problem, surface cracking in a cylindrical structure.http://www.phmsociety.org/sites/all/modules/pubdlcnt/pubdlcnt.php?file=http://www.phmsociety.org/sites/phmsociety.org/files/phm_submission/2010/ijPHM_11_001.pdf&nid=287model-based methodsFatigue PrognosisUncertainty QuantificationNatural VariabilityData UncertaintyModel ErrorFracture MechanicsCrack Growth
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shankar Sankararaman
You Ling
Christopher Shantz
Sankaran Mahadevan
spellingShingle Shankar Sankararaman
You Ling
Christopher Shantz
Sankaran Mahadevan
Uncertainty Quantification in Fatigue Crack Growth Prognosis
International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management
model-based methods
Fatigue Prognosis
Uncertainty Quantification
Natural Variability
Data Uncertainty
Model Error
Fracture Mechanics
Crack Growth
author_facet Shankar Sankararaman
You Ling
Christopher Shantz
Sankaran Mahadevan
author_sort Shankar Sankararaman
title Uncertainty Quantification in Fatigue Crack Growth Prognosis
title_short Uncertainty Quantification in Fatigue Crack Growth Prognosis
title_full Uncertainty Quantification in Fatigue Crack Growth Prognosis
title_fullStr Uncertainty Quantification in Fatigue Crack Growth Prognosis
title_full_unstemmed Uncertainty Quantification in Fatigue Crack Growth Prognosis
title_sort uncertainty quantification in fatigue crack growth prognosis
publisher The Prognostics and Health Management Society
series International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management
issn 2153-2648
publishDate 2011-01-01
description This paper presents a methodology to quantify the uncertainty in fatigue crack growth prognosis, applied to structures with complicated geometry and subjected to variable amplitude multi-axial loading. Finite element analysis is used to address the complicated geometry and calculate the stress intensity factors. Multi-modal stress intensity factors due to multi-axial loading are combined to calculate an equivalent stress intensity factor using a characteristic plane approach. Crack growth under variable amplitude loading is modeled using a modified Paris law that includes retardation effects. During cycle-by-cycle integration of the crack growth law, a Gaussian process surrogate model is used to replace the expensive finite element analysis. The effect of different types of uncertainty – physical variability, data uncertainty and modeling errors – on crack growth prediction is investigated. The various sources of uncertainty include, but not limited to, variability in loading conditions, material parameters, experimental data, model uncertainty, etc. Three different types of modeling errors – crack growth model error, discretization error and surrogate model error – are included in analysis. The different types of uncertainty are incorporated into the crack growth prediction methodology to predict the probability distribution of crack size as a function of number of load cycles. The proposed method is illustrated using an application problem, surface cracking in a cylindrical structure.
topic model-based methods
Fatigue Prognosis
Uncertainty Quantification
Natural Variability
Data Uncertainty
Model Error
Fracture Mechanics
Crack Growth
url http://www.phmsociety.org/sites/all/modules/pubdlcnt/pubdlcnt.php?file=http://www.phmsociety.org/sites/phmsociety.org/files/phm_submission/2010/ijPHM_11_001.pdf&nid=287
work_keys_str_mv AT shankarsankararaman uncertaintyquantificationinfatiguecrackgrowthprognosis
AT youling uncertaintyquantificationinfatiguecrackgrowthprognosis
AT christophershantz uncertaintyquantificationinfatiguecrackgrowthprognosis
AT sankaranmahadevan uncertaintyquantificationinfatiguecrackgrowthprognosis
_version_ 1721343098551795712