Optimal control predicts human performance on objects with internal degrees of freedom.

On a daily basis, humans interact with a vast range of objects and tools. A class of tasks, which can pose a serious challenge to our motor skills, are those that involve manipulating objects with internal degrees of freedom, such as when folding laundry or using a lasso. Here, we use the framework...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arne J Nagengast, Daniel A Braun, Daniel M Wolpert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2009-06-01
Series:PLoS Computational Biology
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/19557193/pdf/?tool=EBI
id doaj-1539334b039744d9ae3f10b8a1055567
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1539334b039744d9ae3f10b8a10555672021-04-21T15:23:41ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Computational Biology1553-734X1553-73582009-06-0156e100041910.1371/journal.pcbi.1000419Optimal control predicts human performance on objects with internal degrees of freedom.Arne J NagengastDaniel A BraunDaniel M WolpertOn a daily basis, humans interact with a vast range of objects and tools. A class of tasks, which can pose a serious challenge to our motor skills, are those that involve manipulating objects with internal degrees of freedom, such as when folding laundry or using a lasso. Here, we use the framework of optimal feedback control to make predictions of how humans should interact with such objects. We confirm the predictions experimentally in a two-dimensional object manipulation task, in which subjects learned to control six different objects with complex dynamics. We show that the non-intuitive behavior observed when controlling objects with internal degrees of freedom can be accounted for by a simple cost function representing a trade-off between effort and accuracy. In addition to using a simple linear, point-mass optimal control model, we also used an optimal control model, which considers the non-linear dynamics of the human arm. We find that the more realistic optimal control model captures aspects of the data that cannot be accounted for by the linear model or other previous theories of motor control. The results suggest that our everyday interactions with objects can be understood by optimality principles and advocate the use of more realistic optimal control models for the study of human motor neuroscience.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/19557193/pdf/?tool=EBI
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Arne J Nagengast
Daniel A Braun
Daniel M Wolpert
spellingShingle Arne J Nagengast
Daniel A Braun
Daniel M Wolpert
Optimal control predicts human performance on objects with internal degrees of freedom.
PLoS Computational Biology
author_facet Arne J Nagengast
Daniel A Braun
Daniel M Wolpert
author_sort Arne J Nagengast
title Optimal control predicts human performance on objects with internal degrees of freedom.
title_short Optimal control predicts human performance on objects with internal degrees of freedom.
title_full Optimal control predicts human performance on objects with internal degrees of freedom.
title_fullStr Optimal control predicts human performance on objects with internal degrees of freedom.
title_full_unstemmed Optimal control predicts human performance on objects with internal degrees of freedom.
title_sort optimal control predicts human performance on objects with internal degrees of freedom.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Computational Biology
issn 1553-734X
1553-7358
publishDate 2009-06-01
description On a daily basis, humans interact with a vast range of objects and tools. A class of tasks, which can pose a serious challenge to our motor skills, are those that involve manipulating objects with internal degrees of freedom, such as when folding laundry or using a lasso. Here, we use the framework of optimal feedback control to make predictions of how humans should interact with such objects. We confirm the predictions experimentally in a two-dimensional object manipulation task, in which subjects learned to control six different objects with complex dynamics. We show that the non-intuitive behavior observed when controlling objects with internal degrees of freedom can be accounted for by a simple cost function representing a trade-off between effort and accuracy. In addition to using a simple linear, point-mass optimal control model, we also used an optimal control model, which considers the non-linear dynamics of the human arm. We find that the more realistic optimal control model captures aspects of the data that cannot be accounted for by the linear model or other previous theories of motor control. The results suggest that our everyday interactions with objects can be understood by optimality principles and advocate the use of more realistic optimal control models for the study of human motor neuroscience.
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/19557193/pdf/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT arnejnagengast optimalcontrolpredictshumanperformanceonobjectswithinternaldegreesoffreedom
AT danielabraun optimalcontrolpredictshumanperformanceonobjectswithinternaldegreesoffreedom
AT danielmwolpert optimalcontrolpredictshumanperformanceonobjectswithinternaldegreesoffreedom
_version_ 1714667356713648128