Effect Sizes, Power, and Biases in Intelligence Research: A Meta-Meta-Analysis
In this meta-study, we analyzed 2442 effect sizes from 131 meta-analyses in intelligence research, published from 1984 to 2014, to estimate the average effect size, median power, and evidence for bias. We found that the average effect size in intelligence research was a Pearson’s correlation of 0.26...
Main Authors: | Michèle B. Nuijten, Marcel A. L. M. van Assen, Hilde E. M. Augusteijn, Elise A. V. Crompvoets, Jelte M. Wicherts |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-10-01
|
Series: | Journal of Intelligence |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/8/4/36 |
Similar Items
-
Effect Declines Are Systematic, Strong, and Ubiquitous: A Meta-Meta-Analysis of the Decline Effect in Intelligence Research
by: Jakob Pietschnig, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01) -
Detecting and correcting publication bias in meta-analysis
by: Li, Xin
Published: (2010) -
Comparison of Methods for Computation and Cumulation of Effect Sizes in Meta-Analysis
by: Ronco, Sharron L. (Sharron Lee)
Published: (1987) -
Analysis of decisions made in meta-analyses of depression screening and the risk of confirmation bias: A case study
by: Goodyear-Smith Felicity A, et al.
Published: (2012-06-01) -
Lack of Publication Bias in Intelligence and Working Memory Research: Reanalysis of Ackerman, Beier, & Boyle, 2005
by: Maciej Taraday
Published: (2019-12-01)