Poor reproducibility of allergic rhinitis SNP associations.

Replication of reported associations is crucial to the investigation of complex disease. More than 100 SNPs have previously been reported as associated with allergic rhinitis (AR), but few of these have been replicated successfully. To investigate the general reproducibility of reported AR-associati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel Nilsson, Anand Kumar Andiappan, Christer Halldén, Chew Fook Tim, Torbjörn Säll, De Yun Wang, Lars-Olaf Cardell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/23382861/pdf/?tool=EBI
id doaj-153e40d670774e2fb2e84fcc6876f0d9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-153e40d670774e2fb2e84fcc6876f0d92021-03-03T20:25:06ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0181e5397510.1371/journal.pone.0053975Poor reproducibility of allergic rhinitis SNP associations.Daniel NilssonAnand Kumar AndiappanChrister HalldénChew Fook TimTorbjörn SällDe Yun WangLars-Olaf CardellReplication of reported associations is crucial to the investigation of complex disease. More than 100 SNPs have previously been reported as associated with allergic rhinitis (AR), but few of these have been replicated successfully. To investigate the general reproducibility of reported AR-associations in candidate gene studies, one Swedish (352 AR-cases, 709 controls) and one Singapore Chinese population (948 AR-cases, 580 controls) were analyzed using 49 AR-associated SNPs. The overall pattern of P-values indicated that very few of the investigated SNPs were associated with AR. Given published odds ratios (ORs) most SNPs showed high power to detect an association, but no correlations were found between the ORs of the two study populations or with published ORs. None of the association signals were in common to the two genome-wide association studies published in AR, indicating that the associations represent false positives or have much lower effect-sizes than reported.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/23382861/pdf/?tool=EBI
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daniel Nilsson
Anand Kumar Andiappan
Christer Halldén
Chew Fook Tim
Torbjörn Säll
De Yun Wang
Lars-Olaf Cardell
spellingShingle Daniel Nilsson
Anand Kumar Andiappan
Christer Halldén
Chew Fook Tim
Torbjörn Säll
De Yun Wang
Lars-Olaf Cardell
Poor reproducibility of allergic rhinitis SNP associations.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Daniel Nilsson
Anand Kumar Andiappan
Christer Halldén
Chew Fook Tim
Torbjörn Säll
De Yun Wang
Lars-Olaf Cardell
author_sort Daniel Nilsson
title Poor reproducibility of allergic rhinitis SNP associations.
title_short Poor reproducibility of allergic rhinitis SNP associations.
title_full Poor reproducibility of allergic rhinitis SNP associations.
title_fullStr Poor reproducibility of allergic rhinitis SNP associations.
title_full_unstemmed Poor reproducibility of allergic rhinitis SNP associations.
title_sort poor reproducibility of allergic rhinitis snp associations.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Replication of reported associations is crucial to the investigation of complex disease. More than 100 SNPs have previously been reported as associated with allergic rhinitis (AR), but few of these have been replicated successfully. To investigate the general reproducibility of reported AR-associations in candidate gene studies, one Swedish (352 AR-cases, 709 controls) and one Singapore Chinese population (948 AR-cases, 580 controls) were analyzed using 49 AR-associated SNPs. The overall pattern of P-values indicated that very few of the investigated SNPs were associated with AR. Given published odds ratios (ORs) most SNPs showed high power to detect an association, but no correlations were found between the ORs of the two study populations or with published ORs. None of the association signals were in common to the two genome-wide association studies published in AR, indicating that the associations represent false positives or have much lower effect-sizes than reported.
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/23382861/pdf/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT danielnilsson poorreproducibilityofallergicrhinitissnpassociations
AT anandkumarandiappan poorreproducibilityofallergicrhinitissnpassociations
AT christerhallden poorreproducibilityofallergicrhinitissnpassociations
AT chewfooktim poorreproducibilityofallergicrhinitissnpassociations
AT torbjornsall poorreproducibilityofallergicrhinitissnpassociations
AT deyunwang poorreproducibilityofallergicrhinitissnpassociations
AT larsolafcardell poorreproducibilityofallergicrhinitissnpassociations
_version_ 1714822584170708992