A Comparison of the Learning Outcomes of Traditional Lecturing with that of Computer-Based Learning in two Optometry Courses
Background and purpose: The literature on distance education has provided different reports about the effectiveness of traditional lecture based settings versus computer based study settings. This study<br />is an attempt to compare the learning outcomes of the traditional lecture based teachi...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences and Health Services
2009-07-01
|
Series: | Journal of Medical Education |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/jme/article/view/1035 |
id |
doaj-161d0440b3c0485e94690c279ba85c87 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-161d0440b3c0485e94690c279ba85c872020-11-24T23:51:56ZengShaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences and Health ServicesJournal of Medical Education1735-39981735-40052009-07-01113&410.22037/jme.v11i3&4.1035868A Comparison of the Learning Outcomes of Traditional Lecturing with that of Computer-Based Learning in two Optometry CoursesH Kangari0A Alipour1SM Tabatabaee2Optometry Department, Faculty member, College of Rehabilitation, Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical SciencesAssociate Professor, Payam Noor University, Faculty of PsychologyStatistics, Faculty member, College of Rehabilitation, Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical SciencesBackground and purpose: The literature on distance education has provided different reports about the effectiveness of traditional lecture based settings versus computer based study settings. This study<br />is an attempt to compare the learning outcomes of the traditional lecture based teaching with that of the computer based learning in the optometry curriculum.<br />Methods: Two courses in the optometry curriculum, Optometry I, with 24 students and Optometry II, with 27 students were used in this study. In each course, the students were randomly divided into two groups. In each scheduled class session, one group randomly attended the lecture, while the other studied in the computer stations. The same content was presented to both groups and at end of each session the same quiz was given to both. In the next session, the groups switched place. This process<br />continued for four weeks. The quizzes were scored and a paired t-test was used to examine any difference. The data was analyzed by SPSS 15 software.<br />Results: The mean score for Optometry I, lecture settings was 3.36 +0.59, for Optometry I computer based study was 3.27+0.63 , for Optometry II, in lecture setting was 3.22+0.57 and for Optometry II, computer based setting was 2.85+0.69. The paired sample t-test was performed on the scores, revealing no statistical significant difference between the two settings. However, the mean score for lecture sessions was slightly higher in lecture settings.<br />Conclusion: Since this study reveals that the learning outcomes in traditional lecture based settings and computer based study are not significantly different, the lecture sessions can be safely replaced<br />by the computer based study session. Further practice in the computer based setting might reveal better outcomes in computer study settings.<br />Key words: LECTURING, COMPUTER BASED LEARNING, DISTANCE EDUCATIONhttp://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/jme/article/view/1035LECTURING, COMPUTER BASED LEARNING, DISTANCE EDUCATION |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
H Kangari A Alipour SM Tabatabaee |
spellingShingle |
H Kangari A Alipour SM Tabatabaee A Comparison of the Learning Outcomes of Traditional Lecturing with that of Computer-Based Learning in two Optometry Courses Journal of Medical Education LECTURING, COMPUTER BASED LEARNING, DISTANCE EDUCATION |
author_facet |
H Kangari A Alipour SM Tabatabaee |
author_sort |
H Kangari |
title |
A Comparison of the Learning Outcomes of Traditional Lecturing with that of Computer-Based Learning in two Optometry Courses |
title_short |
A Comparison of the Learning Outcomes of Traditional Lecturing with that of Computer-Based Learning in two Optometry Courses |
title_full |
A Comparison of the Learning Outcomes of Traditional Lecturing with that of Computer-Based Learning in two Optometry Courses |
title_fullStr |
A Comparison of the Learning Outcomes of Traditional Lecturing with that of Computer-Based Learning in two Optometry Courses |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Comparison of the Learning Outcomes of Traditional Lecturing with that of Computer-Based Learning in two Optometry Courses |
title_sort |
comparison of the learning outcomes of traditional lecturing with that of computer-based learning in two optometry courses |
publisher |
Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences and Health Services |
series |
Journal of Medical Education |
issn |
1735-3998 1735-4005 |
publishDate |
2009-07-01 |
description |
Background and purpose: The literature on distance education has provided different reports about the effectiveness of traditional lecture based settings versus computer based study settings. This study<br />is an attempt to compare the learning outcomes of the traditional lecture based teaching with that of the computer based learning in the optometry curriculum.<br />Methods: Two courses in the optometry curriculum, Optometry I, with 24 students and Optometry II, with 27 students were used in this study. In each course, the students were randomly divided into two groups. In each scheduled class session, one group randomly attended the lecture, while the other studied in the computer stations. The same content was presented to both groups and at end of each session the same quiz was given to both. In the next session, the groups switched place. This process<br />continued for four weeks. The quizzes were scored and a paired t-test was used to examine any difference. The data was analyzed by SPSS 15 software.<br />Results: The mean score for Optometry I, lecture settings was 3.36 +0.59, for Optometry I computer based study was 3.27+0.63 , for Optometry II, in lecture setting was 3.22+0.57 and for Optometry II, computer based setting was 2.85+0.69. The paired sample t-test was performed on the scores, revealing no statistical significant difference between the two settings. However, the mean score for lecture sessions was slightly higher in lecture settings.<br />Conclusion: Since this study reveals that the learning outcomes in traditional lecture based settings and computer based study are not significantly different, the lecture sessions can be safely replaced<br />by the computer based study session. Further practice in the computer based setting might reveal better outcomes in computer study settings.<br />Key words: LECTURING, COMPUTER BASED LEARNING, DISTANCE EDUCATION |
topic |
LECTURING, COMPUTER BASED LEARNING, DISTANCE EDUCATION |
url |
http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/jme/article/view/1035 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hkangari acomparisonofthelearningoutcomesoftraditionallecturingwiththatofcomputerbasedlearningintwooptometrycourses AT aalipour acomparisonofthelearningoutcomesoftraditionallecturingwiththatofcomputerbasedlearningintwooptometrycourses AT smtabatabaee acomparisonofthelearningoutcomesoftraditionallecturingwiththatofcomputerbasedlearningintwooptometrycourses AT hkangari comparisonofthelearningoutcomesoftraditionallecturingwiththatofcomputerbasedlearningintwooptometrycourses AT aalipour comparisonofthelearningoutcomesoftraditionallecturingwiththatofcomputerbasedlearningintwooptometrycourses AT smtabatabaee comparisonofthelearningoutcomesoftraditionallecturingwiththatofcomputerbasedlearningintwooptometrycourses |
_version_ |
1725475486845370368 |