Media Construction of Migrant Crisis

We are living today in the media-constructed reality, so media reporting is of utmost importance for public perceptions of different problems, issues, and phenomena. This particularly refers to the migrant crisis that European countries are increasingly facing in the last few years. The media repor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Želimir KEŠETOVIĆ
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Faculty of Philosophy, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje 2018-12-01
Series:Bezbednosni Dijalozi
Subjects:
Online Access:http://periodica.fzf.ukim.edu.mk/sd/SD%2009.2%20(2018)/SD%2009.2.04%20Ke%C5%A1etovic,%20%C5%BD.%20-%20Media%20Construction%20of%20Migrant%20Crisis.pdf
id doaj-162903943d7c452dbff6ab192dce2d7b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-162903943d7c452dbff6ab192dce2d7b2021-04-11T11:10:52ZengFaculty of Philosophy, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in SkopjeBezbednosni Dijalozi1857-71721857-80552018-12-0192193210.47054/SD1820019kMedia Construction of Migrant CrisisŽelimir KEŠETOVIĆ0Faculty of Security, University of BelgradeWe are living today in the media-constructed reality, so media reporting is of utmost importance for public perceptions of different problems, issues, and phenomena. This particularly refers to the migrant crisis that European countries are increasingly facing in the last few years. The media reporting on the migrant crisis that emphasizes threats to the national welfare system and culture might increase racism, xenophobia, and islamophobia. On the other hand, insisting on humanitarian themes might increase solidarity and tolerance. There are significant differences in media reporting on the migrant crisis between media in European countries that are influenced by state policy, the system of values, traditions, media systems, and other factors. There is even no terminological consensus so different terms are used to address the phenomenon. Germany and Sweden, for example, overwhelmingly used the terms ‘refugee’ or ‘asylum seeker’, whilst Italy and the United Kingdom press preferred the word ‘migrant’. In Spain, the dominant term was ‘immigrant’. These terms had an important impact on the tenor of each country’s debate. In this review paper a comparative overview on media reporting on the migrant crisis in five EU countries, Croatia and Serbia will be given, based on conducted researches, followed by the attempt to explain the differences and construct the models of media reporting on the migrant crisis. Media reports and texts often burdened by ignorance, stereotypes, and prejudices should be replaced by analytic texts based on ethical norms and standards of the journalist profession and basic human values. http://periodica.fzf.ukim.edu.mk/sd/SD%2009.2%20(2018)/SD%2009.2.04%20Ke%C5%A1etovic,%20%C5%BD.%20-%20Media%20Construction%20of%20Migrant%20Crisis.pdfmediamigrant crisisperceptionagenda settingserbia
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Želimir KEŠETOVIĆ
spellingShingle Želimir KEŠETOVIĆ
Media Construction of Migrant Crisis
Bezbednosni Dijalozi
media
migrant crisis
perception
agenda setting
serbia
author_facet Želimir KEŠETOVIĆ
author_sort Želimir KEŠETOVIĆ
title Media Construction of Migrant Crisis
title_short Media Construction of Migrant Crisis
title_full Media Construction of Migrant Crisis
title_fullStr Media Construction of Migrant Crisis
title_full_unstemmed Media Construction of Migrant Crisis
title_sort media construction of migrant crisis
publisher Faculty of Philosophy, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje
series Bezbednosni Dijalozi
issn 1857-7172
1857-8055
publishDate 2018-12-01
description We are living today in the media-constructed reality, so media reporting is of utmost importance for public perceptions of different problems, issues, and phenomena. This particularly refers to the migrant crisis that European countries are increasingly facing in the last few years. The media reporting on the migrant crisis that emphasizes threats to the national welfare system and culture might increase racism, xenophobia, and islamophobia. On the other hand, insisting on humanitarian themes might increase solidarity and tolerance. There are significant differences in media reporting on the migrant crisis between media in European countries that are influenced by state policy, the system of values, traditions, media systems, and other factors. There is even no terminological consensus so different terms are used to address the phenomenon. Germany and Sweden, for example, overwhelmingly used the terms ‘refugee’ or ‘asylum seeker’, whilst Italy and the United Kingdom press preferred the word ‘migrant’. In Spain, the dominant term was ‘immigrant’. These terms had an important impact on the tenor of each country’s debate. In this review paper a comparative overview on media reporting on the migrant crisis in five EU countries, Croatia and Serbia will be given, based on conducted researches, followed by the attempt to explain the differences and construct the models of media reporting on the migrant crisis. Media reports and texts often burdened by ignorance, stereotypes, and prejudices should be replaced by analytic texts based on ethical norms and standards of the journalist profession and basic human values.
topic media
migrant crisis
perception
agenda setting
serbia
url http://periodica.fzf.ukim.edu.mk/sd/SD%2009.2%20(2018)/SD%2009.2.04%20Ke%C5%A1etovic,%20%C5%BD.%20-%20Media%20Construction%20of%20Migrant%20Crisis.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT zelimirkesetovic mediaconstructionofmigrantcrisis
_version_ 1721531229269917696