Osteopathy in Germany: attitudes, beliefs and handling among general practitioners – results of a nationwide cross-sectional questionnaire survey

Abstract Background Osteopathy is a type of complementary medicine based on specific manual techniques. In many countries, including Germany, the profession is not officially regulated, and evidence for the effectiveness of osteopathy is insufficient for most diseases. Nevertheless, many health insu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gordian L. Schmid, Jeremias Kluge, Tobias Deutsch, Anne-Kathrin Geier, Markus Bleckwenn, Susanne Unverzagt, Thomas Frese
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-10-01
Series:BMC Family Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01545-2
id doaj-1653cbd62dcc4ab5b805b1a7ff37ac5c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1653cbd62dcc4ab5b805b1a7ff37ac5c2021-10-10T11:41:10ZengBMCBMC Family Practice1471-22962021-10-0122111110.1186/s12875-021-01545-2Osteopathy in Germany: attitudes, beliefs and handling among general practitioners – results of a nationwide cross-sectional questionnaire surveyGordian L. Schmid0Jeremias Kluge1Tobias Deutsch2Anne-Kathrin Geier3Markus Bleckwenn4Susanne Unverzagt5Thomas Frese6Department of General Practice, Medical Faculty, University of LeipzigDepartment of General Practice, Medical Faculty, University of LeipzigDepartment of General Practice, Medical Faculty, University of LeipzigDepartment of General Practice, Medical Faculty, University of LeipzigDepartment of General Practice, Medical Faculty, University of LeipzigInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Martin-Luther-University Halle-WittenbergInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Martin-Luther-University Halle-WittenbergAbstract Background Osteopathy is a type of complementary medicine based on specific manual techniques. In many countries, including Germany, the profession is not officially regulated, and evidence for the effectiveness of osteopathy is insufficient for most diseases. Nevertheless, many health insurances in Germany offer reimbursement for therapy costs, if osteopathy is recommended by a physician. This cross-sectional survey of German general practitioners (GPs) explored beliefs and attitudes towards osteopathic medicine and described their daily interactions with it. Methods A random sample of 1000 GPs from all federal states was surveyed by mail using a self-designed questionnaire. We collected data on sociodemographics, personal experiences with osteopathy, and attitudes and expectations towards osteopathy. In particular, participants were asked about indications for osteopathic treatment and their beliefs about its effectiveness for different patient groups and diagnoses. A self-designed score was used to estimate general attitudes towards osteopathy and identify factors correlated with greater openness. Additionally, we performed logistic regression to reveal factors associated with the frequency of recommending osteopathy to patients. Results Response rate was 34.4%. 46.5% of participants were women, and the median age was 56.0 years. 91.3% of GPs had referred patients to an osteopath, and 88.0% had recommended osteopathy to their patients. However, 57.5% acknowledged having little or no knowledge about osteopathy. Most frequent reasons for a recommendation were spinal column disorders (46.2%), other complaints of the musculoskeletal system (18.2%) and headaches (9.8%). GPs estimated the highest benefit for chronically ill and middle-aged adults. Female gender (OR 2.09; 95%CI 1.29–3.38) and personal treatment experiences (OR 5.14; 95%CI 2.72–9.72) were independently positively associated with more frequent treatment recommendation. Conclusion GPs in Germany have frequent contact with osteopathy, and the vast majority have recommended osteopathic treatment to some extent in their practice, with foci and opinions comparable to other Western countries. The discrepancy between GPs making frequent referrals for osteopathic treatment while self-assessing to have little knowledge about it demonstrates need for intensified research on the collaboration with osteopaths and how to best integrate osteopathic treatments. Our results may help to focus future effectiveness studies on most relevant clinical conditions in general practice.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01545-2Osteopathic medicineGeneral practiceOsteopathic manipulative treatmentComplementary alternative medicine
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gordian L. Schmid
Jeremias Kluge
Tobias Deutsch
Anne-Kathrin Geier
Markus Bleckwenn
Susanne Unverzagt
Thomas Frese
spellingShingle Gordian L. Schmid
Jeremias Kluge
Tobias Deutsch
Anne-Kathrin Geier
Markus Bleckwenn
Susanne Unverzagt
Thomas Frese
Osteopathy in Germany: attitudes, beliefs and handling among general practitioners – results of a nationwide cross-sectional questionnaire survey
BMC Family Practice
Osteopathic medicine
General practice
Osteopathic manipulative treatment
Complementary alternative medicine
author_facet Gordian L. Schmid
Jeremias Kluge
Tobias Deutsch
Anne-Kathrin Geier
Markus Bleckwenn
Susanne Unverzagt
Thomas Frese
author_sort Gordian L. Schmid
title Osteopathy in Germany: attitudes, beliefs and handling among general practitioners – results of a nationwide cross-sectional questionnaire survey
title_short Osteopathy in Germany: attitudes, beliefs and handling among general practitioners – results of a nationwide cross-sectional questionnaire survey
title_full Osteopathy in Germany: attitudes, beliefs and handling among general practitioners – results of a nationwide cross-sectional questionnaire survey
title_fullStr Osteopathy in Germany: attitudes, beliefs and handling among general practitioners – results of a nationwide cross-sectional questionnaire survey
title_full_unstemmed Osteopathy in Germany: attitudes, beliefs and handling among general practitioners – results of a nationwide cross-sectional questionnaire survey
title_sort osteopathy in germany: attitudes, beliefs and handling among general practitioners – results of a nationwide cross-sectional questionnaire survey
publisher BMC
series BMC Family Practice
issn 1471-2296
publishDate 2021-10-01
description Abstract Background Osteopathy is a type of complementary medicine based on specific manual techniques. In many countries, including Germany, the profession is not officially regulated, and evidence for the effectiveness of osteopathy is insufficient for most diseases. Nevertheless, many health insurances in Germany offer reimbursement for therapy costs, if osteopathy is recommended by a physician. This cross-sectional survey of German general practitioners (GPs) explored beliefs and attitudes towards osteopathic medicine and described their daily interactions with it. Methods A random sample of 1000 GPs from all federal states was surveyed by mail using a self-designed questionnaire. We collected data on sociodemographics, personal experiences with osteopathy, and attitudes and expectations towards osteopathy. In particular, participants were asked about indications for osteopathic treatment and their beliefs about its effectiveness for different patient groups and diagnoses. A self-designed score was used to estimate general attitudes towards osteopathy and identify factors correlated with greater openness. Additionally, we performed logistic regression to reveal factors associated with the frequency of recommending osteopathy to patients. Results Response rate was 34.4%. 46.5% of participants were women, and the median age was 56.0 years. 91.3% of GPs had referred patients to an osteopath, and 88.0% had recommended osteopathy to their patients. However, 57.5% acknowledged having little or no knowledge about osteopathy. Most frequent reasons for a recommendation were spinal column disorders (46.2%), other complaints of the musculoskeletal system (18.2%) and headaches (9.8%). GPs estimated the highest benefit for chronically ill and middle-aged adults. Female gender (OR 2.09; 95%CI 1.29–3.38) and personal treatment experiences (OR 5.14; 95%CI 2.72–9.72) were independently positively associated with more frequent treatment recommendation. Conclusion GPs in Germany have frequent contact with osteopathy, and the vast majority have recommended osteopathic treatment to some extent in their practice, with foci and opinions comparable to other Western countries. The discrepancy between GPs making frequent referrals for osteopathic treatment while self-assessing to have little knowledge about it demonstrates need for intensified research on the collaboration with osteopaths and how to best integrate osteopathic treatments. Our results may help to focus future effectiveness studies on most relevant clinical conditions in general practice.
topic Osteopathic medicine
General practice
Osteopathic manipulative treatment
Complementary alternative medicine
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01545-2
work_keys_str_mv AT gordianlschmid osteopathyingermanyattitudesbeliefsandhandlingamonggeneralpractitionersresultsofanationwidecrosssectionalquestionnairesurvey
AT jeremiaskluge osteopathyingermanyattitudesbeliefsandhandlingamonggeneralpractitionersresultsofanationwidecrosssectionalquestionnairesurvey
AT tobiasdeutsch osteopathyingermanyattitudesbeliefsandhandlingamonggeneralpractitionersresultsofanationwidecrosssectionalquestionnairesurvey
AT annekathringeier osteopathyingermanyattitudesbeliefsandhandlingamonggeneralpractitionersresultsofanationwidecrosssectionalquestionnairesurvey
AT markusbleckwenn osteopathyingermanyattitudesbeliefsandhandlingamonggeneralpractitionersresultsofanationwidecrosssectionalquestionnairesurvey
AT susanneunverzagt osteopathyingermanyattitudesbeliefsandhandlingamonggeneralpractitionersresultsofanationwidecrosssectionalquestionnairesurvey
AT thomasfrese osteopathyingermanyattitudesbeliefsandhandlingamonggeneralpractitionersresultsofanationwidecrosssectionalquestionnairesurvey
_version_ 1716829570106130432