Analyzing ecological restoration strategies for water and soil conservation.

The choice of areas for nature conservation involves the attempt to maximize the benefits, whether by carrying out an economic activity or by the provision of Ecosystem Services. Studies are needed to improve the understanding of the effect of the extent and position along the watershed of restored...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sandra Isay Saad, Jonathan Mota da Silva, Marx Leandro Naves Silva, João Luis Bittencourt Guimarães, Wilson Cabral Sousa Júnior, Ricardo de Oliveira Figueiredo, Humberto Ribeiro da Rocha
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5806870?pdf=render
id doaj-169f73fccf8c42879aa2ed97ecde46d4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-169f73fccf8c42879aa2ed97ecde46d42020-11-24T22:03:07ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01132e019232510.1371/journal.pone.0192325Analyzing ecological restoration strategies for water and soil conservation.Sandra Isay SaadJonathan Mota da SilvaMarx Leandro Naves SilvaJoão Luis Bittencourt GuimarãesWilson Cabral Sousa JúniorRicardo de Oliveira FigueiredoHumberto Ribeiro da RochaThe choice of areas for nature conservation involves the attempt to maximize the benefits, whether by carrying out an economic activity or by the provision of Ecosystem Services. Studies are needed to improve the understanding of the effect of the extent and position along the watershed of restored areas on soil and water conservation. This study aimed to understand how different restoration strategies might reflect in soil conservation and sediment retention. Using InVEST tool, sediment transport was simulated in a small 12 km2 watershed (Posses River, in Southeast Brazil), where one of first Brazilian Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) projects is being carried out, comparing different hypothetical restoration strategies. With 25% of restoration, sediment export decreased by 78% for riparian restoration, and 27% for the steepest slopes restoration. On the other hand, the decrease in soil loss was lower for riparian restoration, with a 16% decrease, while the steepest slopes restoration reduced it by 21%. This mismatch between the reduction of sediment export and soil loss was explained by the fact that forest not only reduces soil loss locally but also traps sediment arriving from the upper parts of the watershed. While the first mechanism is important to provide soil stability, decreasing the risk of landslip, and to maintain agricultural productivity, the second can improve water quality and decrease the risk of silting, with positive effects on the water reservoirs at the outlet of the watershed. This suggests that Riparian and the Steepest Slopes restoration strategies are complementary in the sense of preventing sediments from reaching the water bodies as well as protecting them at their origin (with the reduction of erosion), so it will be advisable to consider the two types of restoration.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5806870?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sandra Isay Saad
Jonathan Mota da Silva
Marx Leandro Naves Silva
João Luis Bittencourt Guimarães
Wilson Cabral Sousa Júnior
Ricardo de Oliveira Figueiredo
Humberto Ribeiro da Rocha
spellingShingle Sandra Isay Saad
Jonathan Mota da Silva
Marx Leandro Naves Silva
João Luis Bittencourt Guimarães
Wilson Cabral Sousa Júnior
Ricardo de Oliveira Figueiredo
Humberto Ribeiro da Rocha
Analyzing ecological restoration strategies for water and soil conservation.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Sandra Isay Saad
Jonathan Mota da Silva
Marx Leandro Naves Silva
João Luis Bittencourt Guimarães
Wilson Cabral Sousa Júnior
Ricardo de Oliveira Figueiredo
Humberto Ribeiro da Rocha
author_sort Sandra Isay Saad
title Analyzing ecological restoration strategies for water and soil conservation.
title_short Analyzing ecological restoration strategies for water and soil conservation.
title_full Analyzing ecological restoration strategies for water and soil conservation.
title_fullStr Analyzing ecological restoration strategies for water and soil conservation.
title_full_unstemmed Analyzing ecological restoration strategies for water and soil conservation.
title_sort analyzing ecological restoration strategies for water and soil conservation.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description The choice of areas for nature conservation involves the attempt to maximize the benefits, whether by carrying out an economic activity or by the provision of Ecosystem Services. Studies are needed to improve the understanding of the effect of the extent and position along the watershed of restored areas on soil and water conservation. This study aimed to understand how different restoration strategies might reflect in soil conservation and sediment retention. Using InVEST tool, sediment transport was simulated in a small 12 km2 watershed (Posses River, in Southeast Brazil), where one of first Brazilian Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) projects is being carried out, comparing different hypothetical restoration strategies. With 25% of restoration, sediment export decreased by 78% for riparian restoration, and 27% for the steepest slopes restoration. On the other hand, the decrease in soil loss was lower for riparian restoration, with a 16% decrease, while the steepest slopes restoration reduced it by 21%. This mismatch between the reduction of sediment export and soil loss was explained by the fact that forest not only reduces soil loss locally but also traps sediment arriving from the upper parts of the watershed. While the first mechanism is important to provide soil stability, decreasing the risk of landslip, and to maintain agricultural productivity, the second can improve water quality and decrease the risk of silting, with positive effects on the water reservoirs at the outlet of the watershed. This suggests that Riparian and the Steepest Slopes restoration strategies are complementary in the sense of preventing sediments from reaching the water bodies as well as protecting them at their origin (with the reduction of erosion), so it will be advisable to consider the two types of restoration.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5806870?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT sandraisaysaad analyzingecologicalrestorationstrategiesforwaterandsoilconservation
AT jonathanmotadasilva analyzingecologicalrestorationstrategiesforwaterandsoilconservation
AT marxleandronavessilva analyzingecologicalrestorationstrategiesforwaterandsoilconservation
AT joaoluisbittencourtguimaraes analyzingecologicalrestorationstrategiesforwaterandsoilconservation
AT wilsoncabralsousajunior analyzingecologicalrestorationstrategiesforwaterandsoilconservation
AT ricardodeoliveirafigueiredo analyzingecologicalrestorationstrategiesforwaterandsoilconservation
AT humbertoribeirodarocha analyzingecologicalrestorationstrategiesforwaterandsoilconservation
_version_ 1725833128017133568