Open-boundary conditions in the deconfined phase

Abstract In this work, we consider open-boundary conditions at high temperatures, as they can potentially be of help to measure the topological susceptibility. In particular, we measure the extent of the boundary effects at $$T=1.5T_c$$ T=1.5Tc and $$T=2.7T_c$$ T=2.7Tc . In the first case, it is lar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adrien Florio, Olaf Kaczmarek, Lukas Mazur
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2019-12-01
Series:European Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7564-z
id doaj-16ae774aa4404d6e972a45ae0abcdbbb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-16ae774aa4404d6e972a45ae0abcdbbb2021-01-03T12:18:17ZengSpringerOpenEuropean Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields1434-60441434-60522019-12-01791211110.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7564-zOpen-boundary conditions in the deconfined phaseAdrien Florio0Olaf Kaczmarek1Lukas Mazur2Laboratory of Particle Physics and Cosmology, Institute of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneKey Laboratory of Quark and Lepton Physics (MOE) and Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal UniversityFakultät für Physik, Universität BielefeldAbstract In this work, we consider open-boundary conditions at high temperatures, as they can potentially be of help to measure the topological susceptibility. In particular, we measure the extent of the boundary effects at $$T=1.5T_c$$ T=1.5Tc and $$T=2.7T_c$$ T=2.7Tc . In the first case, it is larger than at $$T=0$$ T=0 while we find it to be smaller in the second case. The length of this “boundary zone” is controlled by the screening masses. We use this fact to measure the scalar and pseudo-scalar screening masses at these two temperatures. We observe a mass gap at $$T=1.5T_c$$ T=1.5Tc but not at $$T=2.7T_c$$ T=2.7Tc . Finally, we use our pseudo-scalar channel analysis to estimate the topological susceptibility. The results at $$T=1.5T_c$$ T=1.5Tc are in good agreement with the literature. At $$T=2.7T_c$$ T=2.7Tc , they appear to suffer from topological freezing, which prevents us from providing a precise determination of the topological susceptibility.https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7564-z
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Adrien Florio
Olaf Kaczmarek
Lukas Mazur
spellingShingle Adrien Florio
Olaf Kaczmarek
Lukas Mazur
Open-boundary conditions in the deconfined phase
European Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields
author_facet Adrien Florio
Olaf Kaczmarek
Lukas Mazur
author_sort Adrien Florio
title Open-boundary conditions in the deconfined phase
title_short Open-boundary conditions in the deconfined phase
title_full Open-boundary conditions in the deconfined phase
title_fullStr Open-boundary conditions in the deconfined phase
title_full_unstemmed Open-boundary conditions in the deconfined phase
title_sort open-boundary conditions in the deconfined phase
publisher SpringerOpen
series European Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields
issn 1434-6044
1434-6052
publishDate 2019-12-01
description Abstract In this work, we consider open-boundary conditions at high temperatures, as they can potentially be of help to measure the topological susceptibility. In particular, we measure the extent of the boundary effects at $$T=1.5T_c$$ T=1.5Tc and $$T=2.7T_c$$ T=2.7Tc . In the first case, it is larger than at $$T=0$$ T=0 while we find it to be smaller in the second case. The length of this “boundary zone” is controlled by the screening masses. We use this fact to measure the scalar and pseudo-scalar screening masses at these two temperatures. We observe a mass gap at $$T=1.5T_c$$ T=1.5Tc but not at $$T=2.7T_c$$ T=2.7Tc . Finally, we use our pseudo-scalar channel analysis to estimate the topological susceptibility. The results at $$T=1.5T_c$$ T=1.5Tc are in good agreement with the literature. At $$T=2.7T_c$$ T=2.7Tc , they appear to suffer from topological freezing, which prevents us from providing a precise determination of the topological susceptibility.
url https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7564-z
work_keys_str_mv AT adrienflorio openboundaryconditionsinthedeconfinedphase
AT olafkaczmarek openboundaryconditionsinthedeconfinedphase
AT lukasmazur openboundaryconditionsinthedeconfinedphase
_version_ 1724350420846903296