A comparison of different practical indices for assessing carbohydrate quality among carbohydrate-rich processed products in the US.

Healthier carbohydrate (carb)-rich foods are essential for health, but practical, validated indices for their identification are not established. We compared four pragmatic metrics, based on, per 10g of carb:(a) ≥1g fiber (10:1 carb:fiber), (b) ≥1g fiber and <1g free sugars (10:1:1 carb:fiber:fre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Junxiu Liu, Colin D Rehm, Peilin Shi, Nicola M McKeown, Dariush Mozaffarian, Renata Micha
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231572
id doaj-16d9439e230748208f9805543234f467
record_format Article
spelling doaj-16d9439e230748208f9805543234f4672021-03-03T21:44:25ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01155e023157210.1371/journal.pone.0231572A comparison of different practical indices for assessing carbohydrate quality among carbohydrate-rich processed products in the US.Junxiu LiuColin D RehmPeilin ShiNicola M McKeownDariush MozaffarianRenata MichaHealthier carbohydrate (carb)-rich foods are essential for health, but practical, validated indices for their identification are not established. We compared four pragmatic metrics, based on, per 10g of carb:(a) ≥1g fiber (10:1 carb:fiber), (b) ≥1g fiber and <1g free sugars (10:1:1 carb:fiber:free sugars), (c) ≥1g fiber and <2g free sugars (10:1:2 carb:fiber:free sugars); and (d) ≥1g fiber and, per each 1 g of fiber, <2g free sugars (10:1 carb:fiber, 1:2 fiber:free sugars; or 10:1|1:2). Using 2013-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey /Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies, we assessed, overall and for 12 food categories, whether each metric discriminated carb-rich products higher or lower (per 100g) in calories, total fat, saturated fat, protein, sugar, fiber, sodium, potassium, magnesium, folate, and 8 vitamins/minerals. Among 2,208 carb-rich products, more met 10:1 (23.2%) and 10:1|1:2 (21.3%), followed by 10:1:2 (19.2%) and 10:1:1 (16.4%) ratios, with variation by product sub-categories. The 10:1 and 10:1|1:2 ratios similarly identified products with lower calories, fat, free sugars, and sodium; and higher protein, fiber, potassium, magnesium, iron, vitamin B6, vitamin E, zinc and iron. The 10:1:2 and 10:1:1 ratios identified products with even larger differences in calories and free sugars, but smaller differences in other nutrients above and lower folate, thiamine, riboflavin, and niacin; the latter findings were attenuated after excluding breakfast cereals (~9% of products). These novel findings inform dietary guidance for consumers, policy, and industry to identify and promote the development of the healthier carb-rich foods.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231572
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Junxiu Liu
Colin D Rehm
Peilin Shi
Nicola M McKeown
Dariush Mozaffarian
Renata Micha
spellingShingle Junxiu Liu
Colin D Rehm
Peilin Shi
Nicola M McKeown
Dariush Mozaffarian
Renata Micha
A comparison of different practical indices for assessing carbohydrate quality among carbohydrate-rich processed products in the US.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Junxiu Liu
Colin D Rehm
Peilin Shi
Nicola M McKeown
Dariush Mozaffarian
Renata Micha
author_sort Junxiu Liu
title A comparison of different practical indices for assessing carbohydrate quality among carbohydrate-rich processed products in the US.
title_short A comparison of different practical indices for assessing carbohydrate quality among carbohydrate-rich processed products in the US.
title_full A comparison of different practical indices for assessing carbohydrate quality among carbohydrate-rich processed products in the US.
title_fullStr A comparison of different practical indices for assessing carbohydrate quality among carbohydrate-rich processed products in the US.
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of different practical indices for assessing carbohydrate quality among carbohydrate-rich processed products in the US.
title_sort comparison of different practical indices for assessing carbohydrate quality among carbohydrate-rich processed products in the us.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Healthier carbohydrate (carb)-rich foods are essential for health, but practical, validated indices for their identification are not established. We compared four pragmatic metrics, based on, per 10g of carb:(a) ≥1g fiber (10:1 carb:fiber), (b) ≥1g fiber and <1g free sugars (10:1:1 carb:fiber:free sugars), (c) ≥1g fiber and <2g free sugars (10:1:2 carb:fiber:free sugars); and (d) ≥1g fiber and, per each 1 g of fiber, <2g free sugars (10:1 carb:fiber, 1:2 fiber:free sugars; or 10:1|1:2). Using 2013-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey /Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies, we assessed, overall and for 12 food categories, whether each metric discriminated carb-rich products higher or lower (per 100g) in calories, total fat, saturated fat, protein, sugar, fiber, sodium, potassium, magnesium, folate, and 8 vitamins/minerals. Among 2,208 carb-rich products, more met 10:1 (23.2%) and 10:1|1:2 (21.3%), followed by 10:1:2 (19.2%) and 10:1:1 (16.4%) ratios, with variation by product sub-categories. The 10:1 and 10:1|1:2 ratios similarly identified products with lower calories, fat, free sugars, and sodium; and higher protein, fiber, potassium, magnesium, iron, vitamin B6, vitamin E, zinc and iron. The 10:1:2 and 10:1:1 ratios identified products with even larger differences in calories and free sugars, but smaller differences in other nutrients above and lower folate, thiamine, riboflavin, and niacin; the latter findings were attenuated after excluding breakfast cereals (~9% of products). These novel findings inform dietary guidance for consumers, policy, and industry to identify and promote the development of the healthier carb-rich foods.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231572
work_keys_str_mv AT junxiuliu acomparisonofdifferentpracticalindicesforassessingcarbohydratequalityamongcarbohydraterichprocessedproductsintheus
AT colindrehm acomparisonofdifferentpracticalindicesforassessingcarbohydratequalityamongcarbohydraterichprocessedproductsintheus
AT peilinshi acomparisonofdifferentpracticalindicesforassessingcarbohydratequalityamongcarbohydraterichprocessedproductsintheus
AT nicolammckeown acomparisonofdifferentpracticalindicesforassessingcarbohydratequalityamongcarbohydraterichprocessedproductsintheus
AT dariushmozaffarian acomparisonofdifferentpracticalindicesforassessingcarbohydratequalityamongcarbohydraterichprocessedproductsintheus
AT renatamicha acomparisonofdifferentpracticalindicesforassessingcarbohydratequalityamongcarbohydraterichprocessedproductsintheus
AT junxiuliu comparisonofdifferentpracticalindicesforassessingcarbohydratequalityamongcarbohydraterichprocessedproductsintheus
AT colindrehm comparisonofdifferentpracticalindicesforassessingcarbohydratequalityamongcarbohydraterichprocessedproductsintheus
AT peilinshi comparisonofdifferentpracticalindicesforassessingcarbohydratequalityamongcarbohydraterichprocessedproductsintheus
AT nicolammckeown comparisonofdifferentpracticalindicesforassessingcarbohydratequalityamongcarbohydraterichprocessedproductsintheus
AT dariushmozaffarian comparisonofdifferentpracticalindicesforassessingcarbohydratequalityamongcarbohydraterichprocessedproductsintheus
AT renatamicha comparisonofdifferentpracticalindicesforassessingcarbohydratequalityamongcarbohydraterichprocessedproductsintheus
_version_ 1714815352880234496