A Detailed Analysis of the Association between Urate Deposition and Erosions and Osteophytes in Gout

Objective To characterize in detail the structural bone changes associated with the deposition of monosodium urate crystals in the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP1) joint in patients with tophaceous gout. Methods Twenty patients with tophaceous gout and involvement of the MTP1 joint received both dua...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Caroline Pecherstorfer, David Simon, Sara Unbehend, Hanna Ellmann, Matthias Englbrecht, Fabian Hartmann, Camille Figueiredo, Axel Hueber, Judith Haschka, Roland Kocijan, Arnd Kleyer, Georg Schett, Jürgen Rech, Sara Bayat
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-10-01
Series:ACR Open Rheumatology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11172
id doaj-16e3b8bd45904aaf8569e88116b6948f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-16e3b8bd45904aaf8569e88116b6948f2020-11-25T04:00:57ZengWileyACR Open Rheumatology2578-57452020-10-0121056557210.1002/acr2.11172A Detailed Analysis of the Association between Urate Deposition and Erosions and Osteophytes in GoutCaroline Pecherstorfer0David Simon1Sara Unbehend2Hanna Ellmann3Matthias Englbrecht4Fabian Hartmann5Camille Figueiredo6Axel Hueber7Judith Haschka8Roland Kocijan9Arnd Kleyer10Georg Schett11Jürgen Rech12Sara Bayat13Friedrich‐Alexander‐University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen Erlangen GermanyFriedrich‐Alexander‐University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen Erlangen GermanyFriedrich‐Alexander‐University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen Erlangen GermanyFriedrich‐Alexander‐University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen Erlangen GermanyFriedrich‐Alexander‐University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen Erlangen GermanyFriedrich‐Alexander‐University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen Erlangen GermanyFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, and Friedrich‐Alexander‐University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen Erlangen GermanyFriedrich‐Alexander‐University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen Erlangen GermanySt. Vincent Hospital, Vienna, Austria and Academic Teaching Hospital of Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, and Friedrich‐Alexander‐University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen Erlangen GermanyLudwig Boltzmann Institute of Osteology at Hanusch Hospital of OEGK and AUVA Trauma Centre Meidling, 1st Medical Department Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria, and Friedrich‐Alexander‐University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen Erlangen GermanyFriedrich‐Alexander‐University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen Erlangen GermanyFriedrich‐Alexander‐University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen Erlangen GermanyFriedrich‐Alexander‐University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen Erlangen GermanyFriedrich‐Alexander‐University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen Erlangen GermanyObjective To characterize in detail the structural bone changes associated with the deposition of monosodium urate crystals in the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP1) joint in patients with tophaceous gout. Methods Twenty patients with tophaceous gout and involvement of the MTP1 joint received both dual‐energy computed tomography (DECT) of the feet for the detection of tophi and high‐resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR‐pQCT) of the feet for the detection of bone erosions and osteophytes. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Tophi in DECT and erosions and osteophytes in HR‐pQCT were overlayed to define their anatomical relation. In addition, the feet of 20 sex‐ and age‐matched healthy controls were scanned to define the normal architecture of the MTP1 joint. Results Patients with gout had an increased number and extent of bone erosions and osteophytes compared with their healthy counterparts (erosions: 5 [0‐17] vs 1 [1‐2], 45.32 mm3 [7.26‐550.32] vs 0.82 mm3 [0.15‐21.8]; osteophytes: 10.5 [0‐26] vs 1 [0‐10], 4.93 mm [0.77‐7.19 mm] vs 0.93 mm [0.05‐7.61 mm]; all P < 0.001). The median tophi volume detected by DECT (0.12 mm3 [0.01‐2.53]) was highly associated with the total volume of erosions (r = 0.597, P = 0.005). Conclusion Gout patients show increased changes in their bone microarchitecture. The extent of uric acid deposition is positively correlated with the extent of bone loss at the MTP1 joint, highlighting the strong cohesion of inflammation and erosive changes.https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11172
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Caroline Pecherstorfer
David Simon
Sara Unbehend
Hanna Ellmann
Matthias Englbrecht
Fabian Hartmann
Camille Figueiredo
Axel Hueber
Judith Haschka
Roland Kocijan
Arnd Kleyer
Georg Schett
Jürgen Rech
Sara Bayat
spellingShingle Caroline Pecherstorfer
David Simon
Sara Unbehend
Hanna Ellmann
Matthias Englbrecht
Fabian Hartmann
Camille Figueiredo
Axel Hueber
Judith Haschka
Roland Kocijan
Arnd Kleyer
Georg Schett
Jürgen Rech
Sara Bayat
A Detailed Analysis of the Association between Urate Deposition and Erosions and Osteophytes in Gout
ACR Open Rheumatology
author_facet Caroline Pecherstorfer
David Simon
Sara Unbehend
Hanna Ellmann
Matthias Englbrecht
Fabian Hartmann
Camille Figueiredo
Axel Hueber
Judith Haschka
Roland Kocijan
Arnd Kleyer
Georg Schett
Jürgen Rech
Sara Bayat
author_sort Caroline Pecherstorfer
title A Detailed Analysis of the Association between Urate Deposition and Erosions and Osteophytes in Gout
title_short A Detailed Analysis of the Association between Urate Deposition and Erosions and Osteophytes in Gout
title_full A Detailed Analysis of the Association between Urate Deposition and Erosions and Osteophytes in Gout
title_fullStr A Detailed Analysis of the Association between Urate Deposition and Erosions and Osteophytes in Gout
title_full_unstemmed A Detailed Analysis of the Association between Urate Deposition and Erosions and Osteophytes in Gout
title_sort detailed analysis of the association between urate deposition and erosions and osteophytes in gout
publisher Wiley
series ACR Open Rheumatology
issn 2578-5745
publishDate 2020-10-01
description Objective To characterize in detail the structural bone changes associated with the deposition of monosodium urate crystals in the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP1) joint in patients with tophaceous gout. Methods Twenty patients with tophaceous gout and involvement of the MTP1 joint received both dual‐energy computed tomography (DECT) of the feet for the detection of tophi and high‐resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR‐pQCT) of the feet for the detection of bone erosions and osteophytes. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Tophi in DECT and erosions and osteophytes in HR‐pQCT were overlayed to define their anatomical relation. In addition, the feet of 20 sex‐ and age‐matched healthy controls were scanned to define the normal architecture of the MTP1 joint. Results Patients with gout had an increased number and extent of bone erosions and osteophytes compared with their healthy counterparts (erosions: 5 [0‐17] vs 1 [1‐2], 45.32 mm3 [7.26‐550.32] vs 0.82 mm3 [0.15‐21.8]; osteophytes: 10.5 [0‐26] vs 1 [0‐10], 4.93 mm [0.77‐7.19 mm] vs 0.93 mm [0.05‐7.61 mm]; all P < 0.001). The median tophi volume detected by DECT (0.12 mm3 [0.01‐2.53]) was highly associated with the total volume of erosions (r = 0.597, P = 0.005). Conclusion Gout patients show increased changes in their bone microarchitecture. The extent of uric acid deposition is positively correlated with the extent of bone loss at the MTP1 joint, highlighting the strong cohesion of inflammation and erosive changes.
url https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11172
work_keys_str_mv AT carolinepecherstorfer adetailedanalysisoftheassociationbetweenuratedepositionanderosionsandosteophytesingout
AT davidsimon adetailedanalysisoftheassociationbetweenuratedepositionanderosionsandosteophytesingout
AT saraunbehend adetailedanalysisoftheassociationbetweenuratedepositionanderosionsandosteophytesingout
AT hannaellmann adetailedanalysisoftheassociationbetweenuratedepositionanderosionsandosteophytesingout
AT matthiasenglbrecht adetailedanalysisoftheassociationbetweenuratedepositionanderosionsandosteophytesingout
AT fabianhartmann adetailedanalysisoftheassociationbetweenuratedepositionanderosionsandosteophytesingout
AT camillefigueiredo adetailedanalysisoftheassociationbetweenuratedepositionanderosionsandosteophytesingout
AT axelhueber adetailedanalysisoftheassociationbetweenuratedepositionanderosionsandosteophytesingout
AT judithhaschka adetailedanalysisoftheassociationbetweenuratedepositionanderosionsandosteophytesingout
AT rolandkocijan adetailedanalysisoftheassociationbetweenuratedepositionanderosionsandosteophytesingout
AT arndkleyer adetailedanalysisoftheassociationbetweenuratedepositionanderosionsandosteophytesingout
AT georgschett adetailedanalysisoftheassociationbetweenuratedepositionanderosionsandosteophytesingout
AT jurgenrech adetailedanalysisoftheassociationbetweenuratedepositionanderosionsandosteophytesingout
AT sarabayat adetailedanalysisoftheassociationbetweenuratedepositionanderosionsandosteophytesingout
AT carolinepecherstorfer detailedanalysisoftheassociationbetweenuratedepositionanderosionsandosteophytesingout
AT davidsimon detailedanalysisoftheassociationbetweenuratedepositionanderosionsandosteophytesingout
AT saraunbehend detailedanalysisoftheassociationbetweenuratedepositionanderosionsandosteophytesingout
AT hannaellmann detailedanalysisoftheassociationbetweenuratedepositionanderosionsandosteophytesingout
AT matthiasenglbrecht detailedanalysisoftheassociationbetweenuratedepositionanderosionsandosteophytesingout
AT fabianhartmann detailedanalysisoftheassociationbetweenuratedepositionanderosionsandosteophytesingout
AT camillefigueiredo detailedanalysisoftheassociationbetweenuratedepositionanderosionsandosteophytesingout
AT axelhueber detailedanalysisoftheassociationbetweenuratedepositionanderosionsandosteophytesingout
AT judithhaschka detailedanalysisoftheassociationbetweenuratedepositionanderosionsandosteophytesingout
AT rolandkocijan detailedanalysisoftheassociationbetweenuratedepositionanderosionsandosteophytesingout
AT arndkleyer detailedanalysisoftheassociationbetweenuratedepositionanderosionsandosteophytesingout
AT georgschett detailedanalysisoftheassociationbetweenuratedepositionanderosionsandosteophytesingout
AT jurgenrech detailedanalysisoftheassociationbetweenuratedepositionanderosionsandosteophytesingout
AT sarabayat detailedanalysisoftheassociationbetweenuratedepositionanderosionsandosteophytesingout
_version_ 1724448321668382720