Inhibition Shapes Response Selectivity in the Inferior Colliculus by Gain Modulation
Pharmacological block of inhibition is often used to determine if inhibition contributes to spike selectivity, in which a preferred stimulus evokes more spikes than a null stimulus. When inhibitory block reduces spike selectivity, a common interpretation is that differences between the preferred- an...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2012-09-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Neural Circuits |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fncir.2012.00067/full |
id |
doaj-171700e00e624b9992eadf367400746b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-171700e00e624b9992eadf367400746b2020-11-25T01:06:33ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neural Circuits1662-51102012-09-01610.3389/fncir.2012.0006729385Inhibition Shapes Response Selectivity in the Inferior Colliculus by Gain ModulationJoshua X Gittelman0Le eWang1Stephen S Colburn2George D. Pollak3The University of Texas at AustinBoston UniversityBoston UniversityThe University of Texas at AustinPharmacological block of inhibition is often used to determine if inhibition contributes to spike selectivity, in which a preferred stimulus evokes more spikes than a null stimulus. When inhibitory block reduces spike selectivity, a common interpretation is that differences between the preferred- and null-evoked inhibitions created the selectivity from less-selective excitatory inputs. In models based on empirical properties of cells from the inferior colliculus of awake bats, we show that inhibitory differences are not required. Instead, inhibition can enhance spike selectivity by changing the gain, the ratio of output spikes to input current. Within the model, we made preferred stimuli that evoked more spikes than null stimuli using five distinct synaptic mechanisms. In two cases, synaptic selectivity (the differences between the preferred and null inputs) was entirely excitatory, and in two it was entirely inhibitory. In each case, blocking inhibition eliminated spike selectivity. Thus, observing spike rates following inhibitory block did not distinguish among the cases where synaptic selectivity was entirely excitatory or inhibitory. We then did the same modeling experiment using empirical synaptic conductances derived from responses to preferred and null sounds. In most cases, inhibition in the model enhanced spike selectivity mainly by gain modulation and firing rate reduction. Sometimes, inhibition reduced the null gain to zero, eliminating null-evoked spikes. In some cases, inhibition increased the preferred gain more than the null gain, enhancing the difference between the preferred- and null-evoked spikes. Finally, inhibition kept firing rates low. When selectivity is quantified by the selectivity index (SI, the ratio of the difference to the sum of the spikes evoked by the preferred and null stimuli), inhibitory block reduced the SI by increasing overall firing rates. These results are consistent with inhibition shaping spike selectivity by gain control.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fncir.2012.00067/fullauditoryinhibitionmodelingdirectional selectivitygain controlResponse selectivity |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Joshua X Gittelman Le eWang Stephen S Colburn George D. Pollak |
spellingShingle |
Joshua X Gittelman Le eWang Stephen S Colburn George D. Pollak Inhibition Shapes Response Selectivity in the Inferior Colliculus by Gain Modulation Frontiers in Neural Circuits auditory inhibition modeling directional selectivity gain control Response selectivity |
author_facet |
Joshua X Gittelman Le eWang Stephen S Colburn George D. Pollak |
author_sort |
Joshua X Gittelman |
title |
Inhibition Shapes Response Selectivity in the Inferior Colliculus by Gain Modulation |
title_short |
Inhibition Shapes Response Selectivity in the Inferior Colliculus by Gain Modulation |
title_full |
Inhibition Shapes Response Selectivity in the Inferior Colliculus by Gain Modulation |
title_fullStr |
Inhibition Shapes Response Selectivity in the Inferior Colliculus by Gain Modulation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Inhibition Shapes Response Selectivity in the Inferior Colliculus by Gain Modulation |
title_sort |
inhibition shapes response selectivity in the inferior colliculus by gain modulation |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Neural Circuits |
issn |
1662-5110 |
publishDate |
2012-09-01 |
description |
Pharmacological block of inhibition is often used to determine if inhibition contributes to spike selectivity, in which a preferred stimulus evokes more spikes than a null stimulus. When inhibitory block reduces spike selectivity, a common interpretation is that differences between the preferred- and null-evoked inhibitions created the selectivity from less-selective excitatory inputs. In models based on empirical properties of cells from the inferior colliculus of awake bats, we show that inhibitory differences are not required. Instead, inhibition can enhance spike selectivity by changing the gain, the ratio of output spikes to input current. Within the model, we made preferred stimuli that evoked more spikes than null stimuli using five distinct synaptic mechanisms. In two cases, synaptic selectivity (the differences between the preferred and null inputs) was entirely excitatory, and in two it was entirely inhibitory. In each case, blocking inhibition eliminated spike selectivity. Thus, observing spike rates following inhibitory block did not distinguish among the cases where synaptic selectivity was entirely excitatory or inhibitory. We then did the same modeling experiment using empirical synaptic conductances derived from responses to preferred and null sounds. In most cases, inhibition in the model enhanced spike selectivity mainly by gain modulation and firing rate reduction. Sometimes, inhibition reduced the null gain to zero, eliminating null-evoked spikes. In some cases, inhibition increased the preferred gain more than the null gain, enhancing the difference between the preferred- and null-evoked spikes. Finally, inhibition kept firing rates low. When selectivity is quantified by the selectivity index (SI, the ratio of the difference to the sum of the spikes evoked by the preferred and null stimuli), inhibitory block reduced the SI by increasing overall firing rates. These results are consistent with inhibition shaping spike selectivity by gain control. |
topic |
auditory inhibition modeling directional selectivity gain control Response selectivity |
url |
http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fncir.2012.00067/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT joshuaxgittelman inhibitionshapesresponseselectivityintheinferiorcolliculusbygainmodulation AT leewang inhibitionshapesresponseselectivityintheinferiorcolliculusbygainmodulation AT stephenscolburn inhibitionshapesresponseselectivityintheinferiorcolliculusbygainmodulation AT georgedpollak inhibitionshapesresponseselectivityintheinferiorcolliculusbygainmodulation |
_version_ |
1725189561769787392 |