External Validity and Model Validity: A Conceptual Approach for Systematic Review Methodology
Background. Evidence rankings do not consider equally internal (IV), external (EV), and model validity (MV) for clinical studies including complementary and alternative medicine/integrative health care (CAM/IHC) research. This paper describe this model and offers an EV assessment tool (EVAT©) for w...
Main Authors: | Raheleh Khorsan, Cindy Crawford |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2014-01-01
|
Series: | Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/694804 |
Similar Items
-
Challenges of Systematic Reviewing Integrative Health Care
by: Ian D. Coulter, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01) -
Systematic Review of Integrative Health Care Research: Randomized Control Trials, Clinical Controlled Trials, and Meta-Analysis
by: Raheleh Khorsan, et al.
Published: (2011-01-01) -
External validation of a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews (AMSTAR).
by: Beverley J Shea, et al.
Published: (2007-01-01) -
A Systematic Review of Biopsychosocial Training Programs for the Self-Management of Emotional Stress: Potential Applications for the Military
by: Cindy Crawford, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01) -
Reliability and External Validity of AMSTAR in Assessing Quality of TCM Systematic Reviews
by: Deying Kang, et al.
Published: (2012-01-01)