Indicators for Measuring Intergenerational Fairness of Social Security Systems—The Case of the German Social Health Insurance

The issue of fiscal sustainability is often labelled as a synonym for intergenerational fairness; however, pay-as-you-go schemes such as the German Social Health Insurance (SHI) involve a “natural” amount of intergenerational redistribution from younger net payers to older net beneficiaries. We calc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stefan Fetzer, Stefan Moog
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-05-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5743
id doaj-174a3a3dc3934a6daa5abcae5eeb9623
record_format Article
spelling doaj-174a3a3dc3934a6daa5abcae5eeb96232021-06-01T00:36:33ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502021-05-01135743574310.3390/su13105743Indicators for Measuring Intergenerational Fairness of Social Security Systems—The Case of the German Social Health InsuranceStefan Fetzer0Stefan Moog1Faculty of Business, Aalen University of Applied Sciences, D-73430 Aalen, GermanyPrognos AG, D-79100 Freiburg im Breisgau, GermanyThe issue of fiscal sustainability is often labelled as a synonym for intergenerational fairness; however, pay-as-you-go schemes such as the German Social Health Insurance (SHI) involve a “natural” amount of intergenerational redistribution from younger net payers to older net beneficiaries. We calculate intertemporal balance sheets of SHI and compare two generational accounting approaches (GAC and GAIB) with an alternative measure of intergenerational fairness, SM, which we derive from Settergren and Mikula (2005). Our results indicate that the SM concept leads to similar implications concerning the amount of intergenerational redistribution as classical measures of fiscal sustainability. For the SM approach, the balance sheet of SHI shows a rate of unfunded benefits of 25 percent. Closing this gap requires an increase of the contribution rate by 30 to 40 percent. This total effect can be separated into an effect due to the current population structure (10 p.p.), the increase in life expectancy (10 p.p.), and medical technical progress (about 10 to 20 p.p.).https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5743social health insurancefiscal sustainabilityintergenerational fairnessgenerational accountingturnover durationdemographic transition
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stefan Fetzer
Stefan Moog
spellingShingle Stefan Fetzer
Stefan Moog
Indicators for Measuring Intergenerational Fairness of Social Security Systems—The Case of the German Social Health Insurance
Sustainability
social health insurance
fiscal sustainability
intergenerational fairness
generational accounting
turnover duration
demographic transition
author_facet Stefan Fetzer
Stefan Moog
author_sort Stefan Fetzer
title Indicators for Measuring Intergenerational Fairness of Social Security Systems—The Case of the German Social Health Insurance
title_short Indicators for Measuring Intergenerational Fairness of Social Security Systems—The Case of the German Social Health Insurance
title_full Indicators for Measuring Intergenerational Fairness of Social Security Systems—The Case of the German Social Health Insurance
title_fullStr Indicators for Measuring Intergenerational Fairness of Social Security Systems—The Case of the German Social Health Insurance
title_full_unstemmed Indicators for Measuring Intergenerational Fairness of Social Security Systems—The Case of the German Social Health Insurance
title_sort indicators for measuring intergenerational fairness of social security systems—the case of the german social health insurance
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2021-05-01
description The issue of fiscal sustainability is often labelled as a synonym for intergenerational fairness; however, pay-as-you-go schemes such as the German Social Health Insurance (SHI) involve a “natural” amount of intergenerational redistribution from younger net payers to older net beneficiaries. We calculate intertemporal balance sheets of SHI and compare two generational accounting approaches (GAC and GAIB) with an alternative measure of intergenerational fairness, SM, which we derive from Settergren and Mikula (2005). Our results indicate that the SM concept leads to similar implications concerning the amount of intergenerational redistribution as classical measures of fiscal sustainability. For the SM approach, the balance sheet of SHI shows a rate of unfunded benefits of 25 percent. Closing this gap requires an increase of the contribution rate by 30 to 40 percent. This total effect can be separated into an effect due to the current population structure (10 p.p.), the increase in life expectancy (10 p.p.), and medical technical progress (about 10 to 20 p.p.).
topic social health insurance
fiscal sustainability
intergenerational fairness
generational accounting
turnover duration
demographic transition
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5743
work_keys_str_mv AT stefanfetzer indicatorsformeasuringintergenerationalfairnessofsocialsecuritysystemsthecaseofthegermansocialhealthinsurance
AT stefanmoog indicatorsformeasuringintergenerationalfairnessofsocialsecuritysystemsthecaseofthegermansocialhealthinsurance
_version_ 1721414336027557888