Effect of Fast and Slow Pranayama Practice on Cognitive Functions in Healthy Volunteers

Objectives: To compare the cumulative effect of commonly practised slow and fast pranayama on cognitive functions in healthy volunteers. Settings and Design: 84 participants who were in self-reported good health, who were in the age group of 18-25 years, who were randomized to fast pranayama, s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vivek Kumar Sharma, Rajajeyakumar M., Velkumary S., Senthil Kumar Subramanian, Ananda B. Bhavanani, Madanmohan, Ajit Sahai, Dinesh Thangavel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited 2014-01-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/3668/4-7256_E(C)_F(H)_PF1(PP)_PFA(H)_OLF_PFA(AK)_New_PF2(RKH).pdf
id doaj-174aaccdfe594ceda3d5b2721d218d4e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-174aaccdfe594ceda3d5b2721d218d4e2020-11-25T03:22:20ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2014-01-0181101310.7860/JCDR/2014/7256.3668Effect of Fast and Slow Pranayama Practice on Cognitive Functions in Healthy VolunteersVivek Kumar Sharma0Rajajeyakumar M.1Velkumary S.2Senthil Kumar Subramanian3Ananda B. Bhavanani4Madanmohan5Ajit Sahai6Dinesh Thangavel7Assistant Professor, Department of Physiology, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.Assistant Professor, Department of Physiology, Chennai Medical College Hospital & Research Centre, Irungalur, Trichy, Tamilnadu, India.Assistant Professor, Department of Physiology, JIPMER, Pondicherry, India.Senior Resident, Department of Physiology, JIPMER, Pondicherry, India.Deputy Director, CYTER, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, India.Professor and Head, Department of Physiology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, India.Professor & Head, Department of Biostatistics, JIPMER, India.Assistant Professor, Department of Physiology, Vinayaka Mission’s Medical College & Hospital, Keezhakasakudi, Karaikal, Puducherry, India.Objectives: To compare the cumulative effect of commonly practised slow and fast pranayama on cognitive functions in healthy volunteers. Settings and Design: 84 participants who were in self-reported good health, who were in the age group of 18-25 years, who were randomized to fast pranayama, slow pranayama and control group with 28 participants in each group. Material and Methods: Fast pranayama included kapalabhati, bhastrika and kukkuriya. Slow pranayama included nadishodhana, Pranav and Savitri. Respective pranayama training was given for 35 minutes, three times per week, for a duration of 12 weeks under the supervision of a certified yoga trainer. Parameters were recorded before and after 12 weeks of intervention: Perceived stress scale (PSS), BMI, waist to hip ratio and cognitive parameters-letter cancellation test, trail making tests A and B, forward and reverse digit spans and auditory and visual reaction times for red light and green light. Statistical Analysis: Inter–group comparison was done by one way ANOVA and intra-group comparison was done by paired t-test. Results and Conclusion: Executive functions, PSS and reaction time improved significantly in both fast and slow pranayama groups, except reverse digit span, which showed an improvement only in fast pranayama group. In addition, percentage reduction in reaction time was significantly more in the fast pranayama group as compared to that in slow pranayama group. Both types of pranayamas are beneficial for cognitive functions, but fast pranayama has additional effects on executive function of manipulation in auditory working memory, central neural processing and sensory-motor performance.https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/3668/4-7256_E(C)_F(H)_PF1(PP)_PFA(H)_OLF_PFA(AK)_New_PF2(RKH).pdfpranayamacognitive functionsreaction time
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vivek Kumar Sharma
Rajajeyakumar M.
Velkumary S.
Senthil Kumar Subramanian
Ananda B. Bhavanani
Madanmohan
Ajit Sahai
Dinesh Thangavel
spellingShingle Vivek Kumar Sharma
Rajajeyakumar M.
Velkumary S.
Senthil Kumar Subramanian
Ananda B. Bhavanani
Madanmohan
Ajit Sahai
Dinesh Thangavel
Effect of Fast and Slow Pranayama Practice on Cognitive Functions in Healthy Volunteers
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
pranayama
cognitive functions
reaction time
author_facet Vivek Kumar Sharma
Rajajeyakumar M.
Velkumary S.
Senthil Kumar Subramanian
Ananda B. Bhavanani
Madanmohan
Ajit Sahai
Dinesh Thangavel
author_sort Vivek Kumar Sharma
title Effect of Fast and Slow Pranayama Practice on Cognitive Functions in Healthy Volunteers
title_short Effect of Fast and Slow Pranayama Practice on Cognitive Functions in Healthy Volunteers
title_full Effect of Fast and Slow Pranayama Practice on Cognitive Functions in Healthy Volunteers
title_fullStr Effect of Fast and Slow Pranayama Practice on Cognitive Functions in Healthy Volunteers
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Fast and Slow Pranayama Practice on Cognitive Functions in Healthy Volunteers
title_sort effect of fast and slow pranayama practice on cognitive functions in healthy volunteers
publisher JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
series Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
issn 2249-782X
0973-709X
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Objectives: To compare the cumulative effect of commonly practised slow and fast pranayama on cognitive functions in healthy volunteers. Settings and Design: 84 participants who were in self-reported good health, who were in the age group of 18-25 years, who were randomized to fast pranayama, slow pranayama and control group with 28 participants in each group. Material and Methods: Fast pranayama included kapalabhati, bhastrika and kukkuriya. Slow pranayama included nadishodhana, Pranav and Savitri. Respective pranayama training was given for 35 minutes, three times per week, for a duration of 12 weeks under the supervision of a certified yoga trainer. Parameters were recorded before and after 12 weeks of intervention: Perceived stress scale (PSS), BMI, waist to hip ratio and cognitive parameters-letter cancellation test, trail making tests A and B, forward and reverse digit spans and auditory and visual reaction times for red light and green light. Statistical Analysis: Inter–group comparison was done by one way ANOVA and intra-group comparison was done by paired t-test. Results and Conclusion: Executive functions, PSS and reaction time improved significantly in both fast and slow pranayama groups, except reverse digit span, which showed an improvement only in fast pranayama group. In addition, percentage reduction in reaction time was significantly more in the fast pranayama group as compared to that in slow pranayama group. Both types of pranayamas are beneficial for cognitive functions, but fast pranayama has additional effects on executive function of manipulation in auditory working memory, central neural processing and sensory-motor performance.
topic pranayama
cognitive functions
reaction time
url https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/3668/4-7256_E(C)_F(H)_PF1(PP)_PFA(H)_OLF_PFA(AK)_New_PF2(RKH).pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT vivekkumarsharma effectoffastandslowpranayamapracticeoncognitivefunctionsinhealthyvolunteers
AT rajajeyakumarm effectoffastandslowpranayamapracticeoncognitivefunctionsinhealthyvolunteers
AT velkumarys effectoffastandslowpranayamapracticeoncognitivefunctionsinhealthyvolunteers
AT senthilkumarsubramanian effectoffastandslowpranayamapracticeoncognitivefunctionsinhealthyvolunteers
AT anandabbhavanani effectoffastandslowpranayamapracticeoncognitivefunctionsinhealthyvolunteers
AT madanmohan effectoffastandslowpranayamapracticeoncognitivefunctionsinhealthyvolunteers
AT ajitsahai effectoffastandslowpranayamapracticeoncognitivefunctionsinhealthyvolunteers
AT dineshthangavel effectoffastandslowpranayamapracticeoncognitivefunctionsinhealthyvolunteers
_version_ 1724609783500111872