Role of D‐dimer and Fibrinogen in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
The diagnostic potential of D‐dimer and fibrinogen to detect periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip and knee is not well‐understood. The aim of this study was to determine whether D‐Dimer and fibrinogen can be used as effective biomarkers to screen PJI. A systematic review of the literature...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2021-05-01
|
Series: | Orthopaedic Surgery |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12969 |
id |
doaj-175ee0ddc05d4559877e3bc2c5cf87dd |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-175ee0ddc05d4559877e3bc2c5cf87dd2021-05-17T07:20:39ZengWileyOrthopaedic Surgery1757-78531757-78612021-05-0113369270010.1111/os.12969Role of D‐dimer and Fibrinogen in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐AnalysisHong Xu0Jin‐wei Xie1Jing‐li Yang2Ze‐yu Huang3Fu‐xing Pei4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital Sichuan University Chengdu ChinaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital Sichuan University Chengdu ChinaCollege of Earth and Environmental Sciences, School of Public Health Lanzhou University Lanzhou ChinaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, West China Hospital Sichuan University Chengdu ChinaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, West China Hospital Sichuan University Chengdu ChinaThe diagnostic potential of D‐dimer and fibrinogen to detect periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip and knee is not well‐understood. The aim of this study was to determine whether D‐Dimer and fibrinogen can be used as effective biomarkers to screen PJI. A systematic review of the literature indexed in Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Google Scholar databases was performed. All studies using D‐dimer levels in serum or plasma, or fibrinogen levels in plasma, for the diagnosis of PJI were included. Meta‐analysis estimates, including sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratios (DOR), and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUSROC), were calculated using a random‐effects model, and used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of these biomarkers. A total of nine studies were analyzed, and their quality was considered to be acceptable. D‐dimer gave a limited diagnostic value if serum and plasma combined: sensitivity (0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.63 to 0.87]), specificity (0.67, 95% CI [0.54 to 0.78]), DOR (6.81, 95% CI [2.67 to 17.37]), and AUSROC (0.78, 95% CI [0.74 to 0.82]). Plasma D‐dimer levels were associated with less satisfactory sensitivity (0.65, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.71), specificity (0.58, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.66), DOR (2.52, 95% CI 1.64 to 3.90), and AUSROC (0.65, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.69). Serum D‐dimer levels showed higher corresponding values of 0.89 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.94), 0.76 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.89), 24.24 (95% CI 10.07 to 58.32), and 0.91 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.93). Plasma fibrinogen showed acceptable corresponding values of 0.79 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.85), 0.73 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.85), 10.14 (95% CI 6.16 to 16.70), and 0.83 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.86). Serum D‐dimer may be an effective marker for the diagnosis of PJI in hip and knee arthroplasty patients, and it may show higher diagnostic potential than plasma fibrinogen. Plasma D‐dimer may have limited diagnostic potential.https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12969D‐dimerFibrinogenMeta‐analysisPeriprosthetic joint infectionPlasmaSerum |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Hong Xu Jin‐wei Xie Jing‐li Yang Ze‐yu Huang Fu‐xing Pei |
spellingShingle |
Hong Xu Jin‐wei Xie Jing‐li Yang Ze‐yu Huang Fu‐xing Pei Role of D‐dimer and Fibrinogen in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis Orthopaedic Surgery D‐dimer Fibrinogen Meta‐analysis Periprosthetic joint infection Plasma Serum |
author_facet |
Hong Xu Jin‐wei Xie Jing‐li Yang Ze‐yu Huang Fu‐xing Pei |
author_sort |
Hong Xu |
title |
Role of D‐dimer and Fibrinogen in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis |
title_short |
Role of D‐dimer and Fibrinogen in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis |
title_full |
Role of D‐dimer and Fibrinogen in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis |
title_fullStr |
Role of D‐dimer and Fibrinogen in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Role of D‐dimer and Fibrinogen in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis |
title_sort |
role of d‐dimer and fibrinogen in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta‐analysis |
publisher |
Wiley |
series |
Orthopaedic Surgery |
issn |
1757-7853 1757-7861 |
publishDate |
2021-05-01 |
description |
The diagnostic potential of D‐dimer and fibrinogen to detect periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip and knee is not well‐understood. The aim of this study was to determine whether D‐Dimer and fibrinogen can be used as effective biomarkers to screen PJI. A systematic review of the literature indexed in Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Google Scholar databases was performed. All studies using D‐dimer levels in serum or plasma, or fibrinogen levels in plasma, for the diagnosis of PJI were included. Meta‐analysis estimates, including sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratios (DOR), and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUSROC), were calculated using a random‐effects model, and used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of these biomarkers. A total of nine studies were analyzed, and their quality was considered to be acceptable. D‐dimer gave a limited diagnostic value if serum and plasma combined: sensitivity (0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.63 to 0.87]), specificity (0.67, 95% CI [0.54 to 0.78]), DOR (6.81, 95% CI [2.67 to 17.37]), and AUSROC (0.78, 95% CI [0.74 to 0.82]). Plasma D‐dimer levels were associated with less satisfactory sensitivity (0.65, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.71), specificity (0.58, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.66), DOR (2.52, 95% CI 1.64 to 3.90), and AUSROC (0.65, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.69). Serum D‐dimer levels showed higher corresponding values of 0.89 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.94), 0.76 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.89), 24.24 (95% CI 10.07 to 58.32), and 0.91 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.93). Plasma fibrinogen showed acceptable corresponding values of 0.79 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.85), 0.73 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.85), 10.14 (95% CI 6.16 to 16.70), and 0.83 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.86). Serum D‐dimer may be an effective marker for the diagnosis of PJI in hip and knee arthroplasty patients, and it may show higher diagnostic potential than plasma fibrinogen. Plasma D‐dimer may have limited diagnostic potential. |
topic |
D‐dimer Fibrinogen Meta‐analysis Periprosthetic joint infection Plasma Serum |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12969 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hongxu roleofddimerandfibrinogeninthediagnosisofperiprostheticjointinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jinweixie roleofddimerandfibrinogeninthediagnosisofperiprostheticjointinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jingliyang roleofddimerandfibrinogeninthediagnosisofperiprostheticjointinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zeyuhuang roleofddimerandfibrinogeninthediagnosisofperiprostheticjointinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fuxingpei roleofddimerandfibrinogeninthediagnosisofperiprostheticjointinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |
_version_ |
1721438496757907456 |