Role of D‐dimer and Fibrinogen in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

The diagnostic potential of D‐dimer and fibrinogen to detect periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip and knee is not well‐understood. The aim of this study was to determine whether D‐Dimer and fibrinogen can be used as effective biomarkers to screen PJI. A systematic review of the literature...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hong Xu, Jin‐wei Xie, Jing‐li Yang, Ze‐yu Huang, Fu‐xing Pei
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-05-01
Series:Orthopaedic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12969
id doaj-175ee0ddc05d4559877e3bc2c5cf87dd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-175ee0ddc05d4559877e3bc2c5cf87dd2021-05-17T07:20:39ZengWileyOrthopaedic Surgery1757-78531757-78612021-05-0113369270010.1111/os.12969Role of D‐dimer and Fibrinogen in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐AnalysisHong Xu0Jin‐wei Xie1Jing‐li Yang2Ze‐yu Huang3Fu‐xing Pei4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital Sichuan University Chengdu ChinaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital Sichuan University Chengdu ChinaCollege of Earth and Environmental Sciences, School of Public Health Lanzhou University Lanzhou ChinaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, West China Hospital Sichuan University Chengdu ChinaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, West China Hospital Sichuan University Chengdu ChinaThe diagnostic potential of D‐dimer and fibrinogen to detect periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip and knee is not well‐understood. The aim of this study was to determine whether D‐Dimer and fibrinogen can be used as effective biomarkers to screen PJI. A systematic review of the literature indexed in Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Google Scholar databases was performed. All studies using D‐dimer levels in serum or plasma, or fibrinogen levels in plasma, for the diagnosis of PJI were included. Meta‐analysis estimates, including sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratios (DOR), and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUSROC), were calculated using a random‐effects model, and used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of these biomarkers. A total of nine studies were analyzed, and their quality was considered to be acceptable. D‐dimer gave a limited diagnostic value if serum and plasma combined: sensitivity (0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.63 to 0.87]), specificity (0.67, 95% CI [0.54 to 0.78]), DOR (6.81, 95% CI [2.67 to 17.37]), and AUSROC (0.78, 95% CI [0.74 to 0.82]). Plasma D‐dimer levels were associated with less satisfactory sensitivity (0.65, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.71), specificity (0.58, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.66), DOR (2.52, 95% CI 1.64 to 3.90), and AUSROC (0.65, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.69). Serum D‐dimer levels showed higher corresponding values of 0.89 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.94), 0.76 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.89), 24.24 (95% CI 10.07 to 58.32), and 0.91 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.93). Plasma fibrinogen showed acceptable corresponding values of 0.79 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.85), 0.73 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.85), 10.14 (95% CI 6.16 to 16.70), and 0.83 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.86). Serum D‐dimer may be an effective marker for the diagnosis of PJI in hip and knee arthroplasty patients, and it may show higher diagnostic potential than plasma fibrinogen. Plasma D‐dimer may have limited diagnostic potential.https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12969D‐dimerFibrinogenMeta‐analysisPeriprosthetic joint infectionPlasmaSerum
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hong Xu
Jin‐wei Xie
Jing‐li Yang
Ze‐yu Huang
Fu‐xing Pei
spellingShingle Hong Xu
Jin‐wei Xie
Jing‐li Yang
Ze‐yu Huang
Fu‐xing Pei
Role of D‐dimer and Fibrinogen in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
Orthopaedic Surgery
D‐dimer
Fibrinogen
Meta‐analysis
Periprosthetic joint infection
Plasma
Serum
author_facet Hong Xu
Jin‐wei Xie
Jing‐li Yang
Ze‐yu Huang
Fu‐xing Pei
author_sort Hong Xu
title Role of D‐dimer and Fibrinogen in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_short Role of D‐dimer and Fibrinogen in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_full Role of D‐dimer and Fibrinogen in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_fullStr Role of D‐dimer and Fibrinogen in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Role of D‐dimer and Fibrinogen in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_sort role of d‐dimer and fibrinogen in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
publisher Wiley
series Orthopaedic Surgery
issn 1757-7853
1757-7861
publishDate 2021-05-01
description The diagnostic potential of D‐dimer and fibrinogen to detect periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip and knee is not well‐understood. The aim of this study was to determine whether D‐Dimer and fibrinogen can be used as effective biomarkers to screen PJI. A systematic review of the literature indexed in Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Google Scholar databases was performed. All studies using D‐dimer levels in serum or plasma, or fibrinogen levels in plasma, for the diagnosis of PJI were included. Meta‐analysis estimates, including sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratios (DOR), and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUSROC), were calculated using a random‐effects model, and used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of these biomarkers. A total of nine studies were analyzed, and their quality was considered to be acceptable. D‐dimer gave a limited diagnostic value if serum and plasma combined: sensitivity (0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.63 to 0.87]), specificity (0.67, 95% CI [0.54 to 0.78]), DOR (6.81, 95% CI [2.67 to 17.37]), and AUSROC (0.78, 95% CI [0.74 to 0.82]). Plasma D‐dimer levels were associated with less satisfactory sensitivity (0.65, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.71), specificity (0.58, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.66), DOR (2.52, 95% CI 1.64 to 3.90), and AUSROC (0.65, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.69). Serum D‐dimer levels showed higher corresponding values of 0.89 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.94), 0.76 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.89), 24.24 (95% CI 10.07 to 58.32), and 0.91 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.93). Plasma fibrinogen showed acceptable corresponding values of 0.79 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.85), 0.73 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.85), 10.14 (95% CI 6.16 to 16.70), and 0.83 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.86). Serum D‐dimer may be an effective marker for the diagnosis of PJI in hip and knee arthroplasty patients, and it may show higher diagnostic potential than plasma fibrinogen. Plasma D‐dimer may have limited diagnostic potential.
topic D‐dimer
Fibrinogen
Meta‐analysis
Periprosthetic joint infection
Plasma
Serum
url https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12969
work_keys_str_mv AT hongxu roleofddimerandfibrinogeninthediagnosisofperiprostheticjointinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jinweixie roleofddimerandfibrinogeninthediagnosisofperiprostheticjointinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jingliyang roleofddimerandfibrinogeninthediagnosisofperiprostheticjointinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zeyuhuang roleofddimerandfibrinogeninthediagnosisofperiprostheticjointinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fuxingpei roleofddimerandfibrinogeninthediagnosisofperiprostheticjointinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1721438496757907456