Open versus minimally invasive percutaneous surgery for surgical treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures- a multicenter randomized controlled trial: study protocol

Abstract Background Thoracolumbar fractures are most frequent along the spine, and surgical treatment is indicated for unstable fractures. Percutaneous minimally invasive surgery was introduced to reduce the pain associated with the open posterior approach and reduce the morbidity of the procedure b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Helton L. A. Defino, Herton R. T. Costa, Altacílio A. Nunes, Marcello Nogueira Barbosa, Valéria Romero
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-08-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-019-2763-1
id doaj-1773ef86d88c48c9a3a1d17f8d319023
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1773ef86d88c48c9a3a1d17f8d3190232020-11-25T03:01:11ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742019-08-012011710.1186/s12891-019-2763-1Open versus minimally invasive percutaneous surgery for surgical treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures- a multicenter randomized controlled trial: study protocolHelton L. A. Defino0Herton R. T. Costa1Altacílio A. Nunes2Marcello Nogueira Barbosa3Valéria Romero4Faculty of Medicine, University of Sao PauloFaculty of Medicine, University of Sao PauloFaculty of Medicine, University of Sao PauloFaculty of Medicine, University of Sao PauloDepartment of Medical Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, University of CampinasAbstract Background Thoracolumbar fractures are most frequent along the spine, and surgical treatment is indicated for unstable fractures. Percutaneous minimally invasive surgery was introduced to reduce the pain associated with the open posterior approach and reduce the morbidity of the procedure by avoiding damage and dissection of the paravertebral muscles. The goal of this study is to compare the surgical treatment of fractures of the thoracolumbar spine treated by the conventional open approach and the percutaneous minimally invasive approach using similar types of pedicle spine fixation systems. Methods/designs This study is designed as a multi-center, randomized controlled trial of patients aged 18–65 years who are scheduled to undergo surgical posterior fixation. Treatment by the conventional open approach or percutaneous minimally invasive approach will be randomly assigned. The primary outcome measure is postoperative pain, which will be measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS). The secondary outcome parameters are intraoperative bleeding, postoperative drainage, surgery time, length of hospital stay, SF-36, EQ-5D-5 l, HADS, pain medication, deambulation after surgery, intraoperative fluoroscopy time, vertebral segment kyphosis, fracture vertebral body height, compression of the vertebral canal, accuracy of the pedicle screws, and breakage or release of the implants. Patient will be followed up for 1, 2, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively and evaluated according to the outcomes using clinical and radiological examinations, plain radiographs and computed tomografy (CT). Discussion Surgical treatment of thoracolumbar fractures by the open or percutaneous minimally invasive approach will be compared in a multicenter randomized study using similar types of fixation systems, and the results will be evaluated according to clinical and radiological parameters at 1, 2, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months of follow-up. Trial registration ClinicalTrial.gov approval number: 1.933.631, code: NCT03316703 in may 2017.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-019-2763-1SpineSpinal injuriesFracturesBoneMini-open surgeryPedicle screw
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Helton L. A. Defino
Herton R. T. Costa
Altacílio A. Nunes
Marcello Nogueira Barbosa
Valéria Romero
spellingShingle Helton L. A. Defino
Herton R. T. Costa
Altacílio A. Nunes
Marcello Nogueira Barbosa
Valéria Romero
Open versus minimally invasive percutaneous surgery for surgical treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures- a multicenter randomized controlled trial: study protocol
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Spine
Spinal injuries
Fractures
Bone
Mini-open surgery
Pedicle screw
author_facet Helton L. A. Defino
Herton R. T. Costa
Altacílio A. Nunes
Marcello Nogueira Barbosa
Valéria Romero
author_sort Helton L. A. Defino
title Open versus minimally invasive percutaneous surgery for surgical treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures- a multicenter randomized controlled trial: study protocol
title_short Open versus minimally invasive percutaneous surgery for surgical treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures- a multicenter randomized controlled trial: study protocol
title_full Open versus minimally invasive percutaneous surgery for surgical treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures- a multicenter randomized controlled trial: study protocol
title_fullStr Open versus minimally invasive percutaneous surgery for surgical treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures- a multicenter randomized controlled trial: study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Open versus minimally invasive percutaneous surgery for surgical treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures- a multicenter randomized controlled trial: study protocol
title_sort open versus minimally invasive percutaneous surgery for surgical treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures- a multicenter randomized controlled trial: study protocol
publisher BMC
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
issn 1471-2474
publishDate 2019-08-01
description Abstract Background Thoracolumbar fractures are most frequent along the spine, and surgical treatment is indicated for unstable fractures. Percutaneous minimally invasive surgery was introduced to reduce the pain associated with the open posterior approach and reduce the morbidity of the procedure by avoiding damage and dissection of the paravertebral muscles. The goal of this study is to compare the surgical treatment of fractures of the thoracolumbar spine treated by the conventional open approach and the percutaneous minimally invasive approach using similar types of pedicle spine fixation systems. Methods/designs This study is designed as a multi-center, randomized controlled trial of patients aged 18–65 years who are scheduled to undergo surgical posterior fixation. Treatment by the conventional open approach or percutaneous minimally invasive approach will be randomly assigned. The primary outcome measure is postoperative pain, which will be measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS). The secondary outcome parameters are intraoperative bleeding, postoperative drainage, surgery time, length of hospital stay, SF-36, EQ-5D-5 l, HADS, pain medication, deambulation after surgery, intraoperative fluoroscopy time, vertebral segment kyphosis, fracture vertebral body height, compression of the vertebral canal, accuracy of the pedicle screws, and breakage or release of the implants. Patient will be followed up for 1, 2, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively and evaluated according to the outcomes using clinical and radiological examinations, plain radiographs and computed tomografy (CT). Discussion Surgical treatment of thoracolumbar fractures by the open or percutaneous minimally invasive approach will be compared in a multicenter randomized study using similar types of fixation systems, and the results will be evaluated according to clinical and radiological parameters at 1, 2, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months of follow-up. Trial registration ClinicalTrial.gov approval number: 1.933.631, code: NCT03316703 in may 2017.
topic Spine
Spinal injuries
Fractures
Bone
Mini-open surgery
Pedicle screw
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-019-2763-1
work_keys_str_mv AT heltonladefino openversusminimallyinvasivepercutaneoussurgeryforsurgicaltreatmentofthoracolumbarspinefracturesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialstudyprotocol
AT hertonrtcosta openversusminimallyinvasivepercutaneoussurgeryforsurgicaltreatmentofthoracolumbarspinefracturesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialstudyprotocol
AT altacilioanunes openversusminimallyinvasivepercutaneoussurgeryforsurgicaltreatmentofthoracolumbarspinefracturesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialstudyprotocol
AT marcellonogueirabarbosa openversusminimallyinvasivepercutaneoussurgeryforsurgicaltreatmentofthoracolumbarspinefracturesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialstudyprotocol
AT valeriaromero openversusminimallyinvasivepercutaneoussurgeryforsurgicaltreatmentofthoracolumbarspinefracturesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialstudyprotocol
_version_ 1724694515427573760