Diversity of Perceptions on REDD+ Implementation at the Agriculture Frontier in Panama

Colonist farmers have been largely ignored to date in national consultations on reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+). Yet, good practices suggest that understanding all relevant stakeholders’ perspectives, goals, and issues is a precondition for the development of suc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guillaume Peterson St-Laurent, Nancy Gélinas, Catherine Potvin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2013-01-01
Series:International Journal of Forestry Research
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/657846
id doaj-181bf5f7fb894a24b9f41ce00689a6d6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-181bf5f7fb894a24b9f41ce00689a6d62020-11-24T23:22:43ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Forestry Research1687-93681687-93762013-01-01201310.1155/2013/657846657846Diversity of Perceptions on REDD+ Implementation at the Agriculture Frontier in PanamaGuillaume Peterson St-Laurent0Nancy Gélinas1Catherine Potvin2Department of Biology, McGill University, 1205 Doctor Penfield Avenue, Montreal, QC, H3A 1B1, CanadaFaculté de Foresterie, de Géographie et de Géomatique, Université Laval, Québec, QC, G1K 7P4, CanadaDepartment of Biology, McGill University, 1205 Doctor Penfield Avenue, Montreal, QC, H3A 1B1, CanadaColonist farmers have been largely ignored to date in national consultations on reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+). Yet, good practices suggest that understanding all relevant stakeholders’ perspectives, goals, and issues is a precondition for the development of successful environmental policies. The present research documents perceptions of the civil society and the government on the possibility of successfully implementing REDD+ activities with colonist farmers. The focus is on Eastern Panama. The perceptions on REDD+ vary greatly depending on the stakeholders’ origins. The government perceives REDD+ as a possibility for improving laws, increasing control over the national territory, and investing more resources for conservation and public institutions, whereas respondents from colonist backgrounds mostly insist on the potential economic benefits and/or the negative implications that could encompass REDD+. Noncolonist participants from regional, national, and international organizations instead try to balance concerns of communities and conservation objectives. Because one of our results highlighted the difficulty of colonist farmers in speaking as a united voice, we carried out a case study of a successful colonists association in order to identify the characteristics and practices found to facilitate communal organization.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/657846
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Guillaume Peterson St-Laurent
Nancy Gélinas
Catherine Potvin
spellingShingle Guillaume Peterson St-Laurent
Nancy Gélinas
Catherine Potvin
Diversity of Perceptions on REDD+ Implementation at the Agriculture Frontier in Panama
International Journal of Forestry Research
author_facet Guillaume Peterson St-Laurent
Nancy Gélinas
Catherine Potvin
author_sort Guillaume Peterson St-Laurent
title Diversity of Perceptions on REDD+ Implementation at the Agriculture Frontier in Panama
title_short Diversity of Perceptions on REDD+ Implementation at the Agriculture Frontier in Panama
title_full Diversity of Perceptions on REDD+ Implementation at the Agriculture Frontier in Panama
title_fullStr Diversity of Perceptions on REDD+ Implementation at the Agriculture Frontier in Panama
title_full_unstemmed Diversity of Perceptions on REDD+ Implementation at the Agriculture Frontier in Panama
title_sort diversity of perceptions on redd+ implementation at the agriculture frontier in panama
publisher Hindawi Limited
series International Journal of Forestry Research
issn 1687-9368
1687-9376
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Colonist farmers have been largely ignored to date in national consultations on reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+). Yet, good practices suggest that understanding all relevant stakeholders’ perspectives, goals, and issues is a precondition for the development of successful environmental policies. The present research documents perceptions of the civil society and the government on the possibility of successfully implementing REDD+ activities with colonist farmers. The focus is on Eastern Panama. The perceptions on REDD+ vary greatly depending on the stakeholders’ origins. The government perceives REDD+ as a possibility for improving laws, increasing control over the national territory, and investing more resources for conservation and public institutions, whereas respondents from colonist backgrounds mostly insist on the potential economic benefits and/or the negative implications that could encompass REDD+. Noncolonist participants from regional, national, and international organizations instead try to balance concerns of communities and conservation objectives. Because one of our results highlighted the difficulty of colonist farmers in speaking as a united voice, we carried out a case study of a successful colonists association in order to identify the characteristics and practices found to facilitate communal organization.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/657846
work_keys_str_mv AT guillaumepetersonstlaurent diversityofperceptionsonreddimplementationattheagriculturefrontierinpanama
AT nancygelinas diversityofperceptionsonreddimplementationattheagriculturefrontierinpanama
AT catherinepotvin diversityofperceptionsonreddimplementationattheagriculturefrontierinpanama
_version_ 1725566754807087104